Many teams have Indian types names, some they find offensive some they don't.But Redskins is one most do find offensive,as they feel it refers to a time that cash bountys were paid for the skin.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redskin_(slang)
yes indeed, "redskin" is the most racist of all sports team names - indian american author ward churchill wrote a great article on this whole issue "lets spread the 'fun' around" ; in it he asks the reader to imagine if there were teams called 'the sambos,' 'the spics,' or 'the gooks,' - but the reason why there aren't such teams, why redskin continues to be accepted, and why only Indians must suffer team-name mockery is simply because, "Indians are (falsely) percieved as being too few, and therefore too weak to defend themselves against racist and otherwise offensive behavior."
some people have noted that stanford's "cardinal" is a shitty name - but i don;t think anyone has mentioned that they changed it from 'stanford indians.'
and also, according to churchill, there are some newspapers out there in america, such as 'the portland post' - which refuse to print the word 'redskins,' and so refer to them by 'the washington team.'
i don;t mind a team being called "indians" - becuase in a way it is a reminder of americas past and the people who lived on the land where these major cities and teams are now located - and in some ways this is the ONLY way in which the american indian recieves any recognition...but "redskin" is just too close to the actual reality of skin color and the differences and problems that come with it...why not 'blackskins,' or 'yellowskins' ?
churchill's message in most of his writings is to show how american indians have been, and continue to be, the most victimized ethnic group in the united states.