Their job is nothing more than that; a job. Why should a police officer be punished with more severity if his/her crime completely contradicts what they do for a living? Other than the fact that they hold the title of a police officer, I see no justified reason as to why such action should be taken. What I mean is...
A firefighter's job is to put out fires. As a society, we put our trust into firefighters to extinguish fires when we need them. Now, if a firefighter violates our trust and commits arson, should they serve a more severe punishment than anyone else who commits arson? No.
An anger management therapist's job is to help people control their anger issues. As a society, we put our trust into anger management therapists to assist people in controlling their rage and outbursts. Now, if an anger management therapist violates our trust and snaps one day, beating up a man who gave them a dirty look, should they serve a more severe punishment than anyone else who gets arrested for battery? No.
A drug rehab counselor's job is to help people recover from drug addiction. As a society, we put our trust into drug rehab counselors to encourage people to stay off of drugs. Now, if a drug rehab counselor violates our trust and snorts cocaine on the weekends, should they serve a more severe punishment than anyone else who gets busted using drugs? No.
A police officer's job is to enforce and uphold the law. As a society, we put our trust into police officers to eliminate law breakers from our streets, making our cities a safer place to live. Now, if that police officer gets caught going 98MPH in a 65MPH, should they serve a more severe punishment than anyone else who gets caught speeding? ...yes?
I know that we all have our own points of view on police officers and whether or not they should be held to a higher standard than everyday citizens, but do you see my point?
Personally, I think it's unfair to condemn someone with such ferocity just because their job is that of a police officer.
Now, in the case of this guy, he was on duty, so he should be punished for his actions that violated the code of conduct for a police officer. But, that's only because he was on duty. If he was off duty, it would be a completely different story.
I agree that he took advantage of his badge, but I still don't think that police officers should be held to some unreasonable standard of perfection. Everybody makes mistakes and nobody is perfect; even if you wear a badge and carry a gun.
Obviously his actions were way out of line and I'm not saying that they weren't. But, you are forgetting that his son was involved in this so you can't deny that personal, family-related emotions had something to do with this. This officer could have a perfectly clean record of service and, before this incident, could've been the cleanest, most respectful officer on the force. Why should all of that be erased just because of one mistake? Nobody is perfect. And, like I said before, if his son wasn't involved with this, I am willing to bet that his actions would've been nothing like they were.
But, to answer your question...no, I wouldn't want someone who freaks out over a fender bender to patrol the streets. But, once again, you can't forget that his son was involved in this, which could've easily made him snap. I'm not a parent myself, but I can understand why people freak out over a situation when their own child is involved.