SLIM Naturally BUSTY Young Women / Thin Chicks, Big NATURAL Tits!

Re: Thin Chicks, Big NATURAL Tits!

Check this one out!

[Please Note: the attachment in this post has been deleted by moderator AFA]
[Read more about the board rules: here]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thin? Or can they be slender while still wide?

Do you mean more "tits on a stick"?
Or do you also want wide women who are slender (who would have difficulty getting below size 10 or 8 when on an extreme diet)?

The reason I ask is because a few mentioned Merilyn Sekova, who -- in my view -- is a wider, but extremely slender, near-apple, super-busty Goddess (yes, big "G" as she represents much of God Herself). She's not what I call "thin" but "wider and extremely slender" (to the point her ribcage shows under those massive mammaries).

The initial post with Shay Laren is about as ideal of a "thin, busty" woman as you can get in my eyes as she has an extreme hourglass. That extreme hourglass of hers is just enough to get me to notice her over wide, full, but very slender hourglass women.

Someone else mentioned Petra Verkaik who is not-so-coincidentally the woman who got me to recognize busty brunettes again back in high school. That then led me to experiment with busty women, and lead me to my preference of wide, but slender full figured women.

Another good example, probably just a tad fuller than Shay, is Milly Morris (aka Jessika / Monika). If you're not seeing a theme here, I want a woman with full fanging, cock engulfing, cum siphoning hips when I become one with her. Milly is still thin, still busty, but has a figure that just widens out where my manhood would join her internally. Same goes for Shay and Petra.

But women like Chloe Vevrier are my ideal hourglass, but full figured lovers. Women that have wide hips like their wide chests, which typically sport as "wide bust" which typically means a larger, hanging set of mammary flesh as a "bonus." Even when some of these women are thinner, they aren't as hot as when they are wider, but still as slender, in my view. Perfect examples are Autumn-Jade and Kerry Marie (although Kerry has gone too far the other way, into BBW land, and is no longer remotely slender).

Couple of threads I started that emphasize the differences of both my loves ...

Full figured women (FFW), but slender, voluptuous NOT chubby:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=112412

Thin (not full) fucking hips:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=164618

I prefer wider, fuller women by default and overwhelmingly. But some thin, hourglass women are extremely beautiful and I'd have trouble not looking at them as well.
 
Re: Thin? Or can they be slender while still wide?

Do you mean more "tits on a stick"?
Or do you also want wide women who are slender (who would have difficulty getting below size 10 or 8 when on an extreme diet)?

The reason I ask is because a few mentioned Merilyn Sekova, who -- in my view -- is a wider, but extremely slender, near-apple, super-busty Goddess (yes, big "G" as she represents much of God Herself). She's not what I call "thin" but "wider and extremely slender" (to the point her ribcage shows under those massive mammaries).

The initial post with Shay Laren is about as ideal of a "thin, busty" woman as you can get in my eyes as she has an extreme hourglass. That extreme hourglass of hers is just enough to get me to notice her over wide, full, but very slender hourglass women.

Someone else mentioned Petra Verkaik who is not-so-coincidentally the woman who got me to recognize busty brunettes again back in high school. That then led me to experiment with busty women, and lead me to my preference of wide, but slender full figured women.

Another good example, probably just a tad fuller than Shay, is Milly Morris (aka Jessika / Monika). If you're not seeing a theme here, I want a woman with full fanging, cock engulfing, cum siphoning hips when I become one with her. Milly is still thin, still busty, but has a figure that just widens out where my manhood would join her internally. Same goes for Shay and Petra.

But women like Chloe Vevrier are my ideal hourglass, but full figured lovers. Women that have wide hips like their wide chests, which typically sport as "wide bust" which typically means a larger, hanging set of mammary flesh as a "bonus." Even when some of these women are thinner, they aren't as hot as when they are wider, but still as slender, in my view. Perfect examples are Autumn-Jade and Kerry Marie (although Kerry has gone too far the other way, into BBW land, and is no longer remotely slender).

Couple of threads I started that emphasize the differences of both my loves ...

Full figured women (FFW), but slender, voluptuous NOT chubby:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=112412

Thin (not full) fucking hips:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=164618

I prefer wider, fuller women by default and overwhelmingly. But some thin, hourglass women are extremely beautiful and I'd have trouble not looking at them as well.


Hows it going buddy!

you've obviously spent alot of time classifying chicks into all these slightly different groups, im a bit confused myself, but to answer your initial question, are we looking for "tits on a stick"... I guess we are.

There are quite a few posts of VERY sexy, VERY busty chicks with VERY real tits, so what I thought would be kind of cool, is to have a thread dedicated soley to chick that would be a size 6-8 at the most, but also happen to have HUGE natural tits!

Its easy for any skinny chick to have big tits after some implants, but for a skinny chick to have REAL BIG TITS natually is pretty rare, and should be celebrated! lol

so come on guys, keep the pics coiming for us all to enjoy ;)
 
Re: Thin Chicks, Big NATURAL Tits!

Anna
 
"Classification" is really not the point ...

you've obviously spent alot of time classifying chicks into all these slightly different groups,
It's not really about "classification," but merely an attempt to describe the "variety" of women that exist. It's not merely "fat" or "thin" any more than "Democrat" or "Republican" describes political parties in the US. It's actually not only multiple answers to just one value, but actually multiple answers to multiple values.

You can have a "fat" size 6-8 and a "slender" size 10, depending on the woman's size, shape, proportion, etc... I attempted to address much of this when I re-wrote the Wikipedia entry for Female Body Shape:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_body_shape

The first two (2) sections of that entry remain largely unchanged from when I wrote them (I only added a couple of fixes and clarifications after others commented).
im a bit confused myself,
The confusion occurs when you try to categorize only one type of two different values. The same thing happens in politics with most people on this board thinking I'm a Republican and most people on more conservative boards thinking I'm a Democrat. I'm actually very exacting and very picky, far more than most.

but to answer your initial question, are we looking for "tits on a stick"... I guess we are.
So you want very thin women, no width or size/proportion to them, with big breasts.

There are quite a few posts of VERY sexy, VERY busty chicks with VERY real tits, so what I thought would be kind of cool, is to have a thread dedicated soley to chick that would be a size 6-8 at the most, but also happen to have HUGE natural tits!
Understood.

Its easy for any skinny chick to have big tits after some implants, but for a skinny chick to have REAL BIG TITS natually is pretty rare, and should be celebrated! lol
so come on guys, keep the pics coiming for us all to enjoy ;)
There are so few hot, hourglass thin women that satisfy, but I will re-point out that Shay Laren is my type of example of this.

I'd have to argue that Merilyn might be just a tad too wide to quality, but maybe she still does. Don't know for sure.
 
Top