This is something I've thought quite a bit about, so I apologize for a lengthy (and possibly redundant at times) reply. And yes, I'm definitely in favor of raising the driving age. I'm in favor of not driving altogether!
On the other hand, parents just don't have the time to drive their kids everywhere they want and sometimes need to go, so teenagers being able to drive is almost a necessity.
Yes ! Why the hell not ? A kid with a car is more likely to get a part time job, after school hours. Work is good ! It teaches kids a plethora of lessons, skills and responsibilities.
where do teenagers need to go? to school, that's it. they don't need to go to the fucking mall. If they want to they can take the bus or ride a bike, that's what I did.
I also disagree that they need jobs. Unless you are going to make them pay rent, just having money so that they can shop frivolously is not going to teach them responsibility, it will just get them in the habit of irresponsible spending when they become an adult.
I think kids should enjoy the small time they have being kids. why the rush to responsibility? that's the whole point of being a kid, no responsibility. they have the rest of their lives to be indentured servants and always having to account for everything.
I have to agree with calpoon, here. I have plenty of friends who feel like their first car was the start of freedom, and I always feel a little sad for them, because my freedom came on two wheels five years earlier. Maybe one in a dozen times did I ever ask my folks to take me anywhere from then on - whether that be friends' houses, sports practices, or what-have-you. For the rest of my life on.
I think the driving age without an adult in the car should be raised to 18... but I also think the legal drinking age should be lowered to 18.
I've always thought the drinking age being set to 21 was discrimination, to be honest. A blatant 'one-time' dip into our rights for 'safety' - well, No_Man said it quite well (emphasis added):
Make it one standard age of majority. There were 29,569 deaths by firearms in the U.S. in 2004. In the same year, there 42,836 automobile deaths. If a person is too young to own a gun at 16, why in the world would we want to put them in control of a device that kills over 10,000 more people every year? And in the same token, if you're old enough to be responsible with a gun at 18 (along with serving in the military, serving as a juror, and voting), why aren't you responsible enough to handle alcohol? Rule #1 (or, at least, way up there) of teaching any child is, "Be consistent." It'd be helpful if the government would help us out with that.
You get your learner's licence when you're 15 up here in Canada.
That's the way it is down here. Learner's Permit at 15.
Anyone up til the age of 21 needs to bike their ass to work, honestly. Bunch of friggin' idiots who never have the right mindset to succeed in ANY circumcstances.. let alone driving tests.
Teens are idiots. Make smoking 16, drinking 18, driving 21.
While I don't agree with the smoking bit, I do agree with the idea that the 21-age limit hit the wrong 'solution'. Somebody (most influentially, Mothers Against Drunk Driving) saw a problem: alcohol and driving, when mixed, often turns fatal. Fair enough, that warrants looking into a solution. Well, banning the two together just didn't get enough results. So, what they ought to have done at that point was look at how many people alcohol kills every year (including drunk driving) and how many people automobiles kill every year (including drunk driving) and take away the greater killer.
Obviously, they did not. And we haven't even mentioned environmental and road congestion benefits had they picked the better option.
But in Finland you become sexually legal when you are 16, having sex is more fun than driving anyways.
Yeah it is!