On the flip side, MSNBC is liberal as fuck. There really isn't a true balancd news network. CNN is the closest thing, and even they are leaning more toward the liberal side.
Sarah Palin signs on as a commentator with Fox News
- Thread starter Namreg
- Start date
On the flip side, MSNBC is liberal as fuck. There really isn't a true balancd news network. CNN is the closest thing, and even they are leaning more toward the liberal side.
Rey C.
Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
True.
If Dennis Leary can admit to masturbating to NBC's "Caroline in the City" in 1997, then I can admit in 2010 that I have occasionally manually jacked off to Mary katharine Ham, and Kirsten Powers on Fox News. :o
That would make my day so it would :thumbsup:
There would be plenty of :rubbel: from me at Sarah's pictures if that happened.
StanScratch
My Penis Is Dancing!
Really, I'm pretty disappointed. I'm hoping this is not a long-term plan - I've been stroking off to the thought of a Palin-Beck ticket for months now. He's got him some really pretty lips and eyes.
She was with Bill O tonight and I flipped the channel as soon as I got a glimpse of her. That board not all there and Bill O is not far behind
You know he's plowing her, married or not.
Lotion. Check!
Tissues. Check!
DVR Set to Record. Check!
Watching the limo scene with Jamie Lee Curtis in True Lies! Hell yeah check!
Oh... I'm sorry. What's going on in here???
Tissues. Check!
DVR Set to Record. Check!
Watching the limo scene with Jamie Lee Curtis in True Lies! Hell yeah check!
Oh... I'm sorry. What's going on in here???
Jane Burgess
Official Checked Star Member
Fox is as balanced as every other network. You just like to blast Fox because it is a Republican channel. You seem to have no problem that all the other channels are biased. I guess since they lean the way you want that is ok.
Be a Democrat but don't be one that is always crying about Fox and how it is unfair. Damn I don't cry about all the other news channels, I just don't watch them. If you don't like Fox, don't watch it. Simple as that. :2 cents:
:1orglaugh
Should I rest my case now? :spump:Well because the other channels aren't biased. The merely have hosts that generally are. The other networks you seem to try and equate with Fox's bias employ as hosts people who represent the other side. That's HOSTS JaneB...not guests. The difference is "hosts" and their producers control the agenda, the guest, et al of a show..guests don't.
It's clear to anyone with eyes and ears that Fox exists not only to give the other side but as you pointed out, promote the republican cause.
Whether I'm a Demo or not, (which I'm not) doesn't mean I should just ignore blatant and obvious misrepresentation of the truth especially when that idiocy makes it's way to places where it's repeated by numb skulls who either don't think, won't think or enjoy misrepresenting facts themselves....
Philbert
Banned
:1orglaugh
Well because the other channels aren't biased. The merely have hosts that generally are. The other networks you seem to try and equate with Fox's bias employ as hosts people who represent the other side. That's HOSTS JaneB...not guests. The difference is "hosts" and their producers control the agenda, the guest, et al of a show..guests don't.
It's clear to anyone with eyes and ears that Fox exists not only to give the other side but as you pointed out, promote the republican cause.
Whether I'm a Demo or not, (which I'm not) doesn't mean I should just ignore blatant and obvious misrepresentation of the truth especially when that idiocy makes it's way to places where it's repeated by numb skulls who either don't think, won't think or enjoy misrepresenting facts themselves....
Wow...that is a most perfect description of the Democratic Congress and most of the Demotard Talking heads here on FOs...if it quacks like a Demotard, etc...no matter what you call yourself this month, you absolutely quack like a Demotard.
Jane is impervious to your attempts to catch her out...she has made it clear where she stands. She's a nice girl, who sees no Evil.
Namreg
Banned
exactly. fox is not news. they simply tell lies to people to further rupert murdoch's agenda.
i have nothing against an opposing point of view, or an intelligent discussion, but fox is not an opposing view, it's simply a distorted view. one can argue about he color of the sky for example, is it blue, is it grey; but fox will just say "there is no sky." that doesn't make it true.
and as far as intelligent discussions go... personal attacks are not valid arguments. they prove no point, other than that the person making them has no valid arguments. fox specialises in personal attacks, they have to since they cannot possibly hit back with facts since they simply lie to people.
Jane Burgess
Official Checked Star Member
:1orglaugh
Well because the other channels aren't biased. The merely have hosts that generally are. The other networks you seem to try and equate with Fox's bias employ as hosts people who represent the other side. That's HOSTS JaneB...not guests. The difference is "hosts" and their producers control the agenda, the guest, et al of a show..guests don't.
It's clear to anyone with eyes and ears that Fox exists not only to give the other side but as you pointed out, promote the republican cause.
Whether I'm a Demo or not, (which I'm not) doesn't mean I should just ignore blatant and obvious misrepresentation of the truth especially when that idiocy makes it's way to places where it's repeated by numb skulls who either don't think, won't think or enjoy misrepresenting facts themselves....
Why do you care what they say? If you don't agree you move on. What other people choose to watch is their business. Who are you to judge what is right or wrong?
Jane Burgess
Official Checked Star Member
Wow...that is a most perfect description of the Democratic Congress and most of the Demotard Talking heads here on FOs...if it quacks like a Demotard, etc...no matter what you call yourself this month, you absolutely quack like a Demotard.
Jane is impervious to your attempts to catch her out...she has made it clear where she stands. She's a nice girl, who sees no Evil.
I am a proud Republican. I don't care if people like Fox news or not. I can proudly say I am not kissing Obama's ass and I feel sorry for the people that actually thought he was going to make a positive change. He is making a change alright, a change for the worst. :2 cents:
with stunts like this she keeps getting into more and more trouble.
Facetious
Moderated
^ I assume that you were referring to Palin ? Or course you were.
Can't you simply admit that there are other schools of thought instead of dumping all of the same 'ol vitriol ? See, YOU LIE ! C'mon man ! Obarry is president .. why so a-n-g-r-y and offensive ? I think that you need to get away from the desktop, ya know ?, a little change of scenery, you're gettin manic on us.
Or course you were.:spin:
Green Party ?
for example :dunno:
It's all rhetoric mega
Can't you simply admit that there are other schools of thought instead of dumping all of the same 'ol vitriol ? See, YOU LIE ! C'mon man ! Obarry is president .. why so a-n-g-r-y and offensive ? I think that you need to get away from the desktop, ya know ?, a little change of scenery, you're gettin manic on us.METAL HEAD
Closed Account
just keep her away from world news tonight
Who am I to judge what is right or wrong??
Uhh, when it comes to fact or fiction we all should have the ability to judge what is right and what is wrong. You never learned that is the most basic thing we as humans do?:crying::1orglaughGreen Party ? for example :dunno:
How about good ol' fashioned Independent? I know, I know its very difficult for some of you, your cohorts and cohortesses <chuckle> to fathom a circumstance whereby there are those who don't like republicans but are not just by default democrats.:wave2:
Other schools of thought is one thing. But when Hannity for example, says Obama was legally required to authorize action in the pirate/hostage situation...then states that to mean the misrepresentation of Obama having no decision but to authorize the action is one of three things; A clear and deliberate misrepresentation of the facts, flat ignorance of the facts or willful ignorance of the facts. The fact is, the requirement level in that case is "executive decision" meaning the action cannot be taken without the president's authorization.
To say Fox lies is probably not completely accurate. But they clearly and repeatedly engage in willful deceptions, omissions and errors of convenience and obvious misrepresentations to further an agenda of promoting the republican party. No other major network does that (as a network).
Leading to my last point...Anchors, reporters host, guests...We all know networks employ these people...We (should) expect relative objectivity from anchors and reporters. But setting aside whether Fox's reporters and anchors are relatively objective, the biggest contention seems to be with the hosts on these networks. I don't have a problem with biased hosts....it's their job to argue a perspective. But the other networks who are inclined to have shows hosted by political spinners...have hosts from both sides with their own shows. I suppose you could argue a network is biased because they employ a Keith Olbermann but that same network employs a former republican congressman who has his own show to perpetuate his own agenda. Fox has no such circumstance with the opposing side having a platform to promote their perspective. :dunno: Who cares, that's Fox's business but then don't try and contend with a straight face they're not different. Because they are...quite different.
Similar threads
