Santorum: McCain doesn't understand interrogation

I just spitballing here but I'm guessing because he's basically turned 180 on nearly everything he said while campaigning...

:dunno:

I'm not a politician.
If I say I'm going to do something it usually happens?

What, no bother reading the context of the question?

If Obama had been calling for a 16 month withdrawal timeline upon entering office but GWB finally agrees to an 17 or 18 month timeline...what would Obama have to change to the policy?? Rewrite the entire SOFA just to shave 1 or 2 months off of it and call it his??:rolleyes:

With respect to this thread, Santorum is an idiot who claimed for some dumb reason that WMDs were actually found by us in Iraq and lately is consistently claiming something equally curious..that McCain doesn't understand interrogation.:facepalm:

But I get the new spin...Obama has done a 180 because some of you just didn't listen to what he campaigned on.
 
What, no bother reading the context of the question?

If Obama had been calling for a 16 month withdrawal timeline upon entering office but GWB finally agrees to an 17 or 18 month timeline...what would Obama have to change to the policy?? Rewrite the entire SOFA just to shave 1 or 2 months off of it and call it his??:rolleyes:

With respect to this thread, Santorum is an idiot who claimed for some dumb reason that WMDs were actually found by us in Iraq and lately is consistently claiming something equally curious..that McCain doesn't understand interrogation.:facepalm:

But I get the new spin...Obama has done a 180 because some of you just didn't listen to what he campaigned on.

Not necessarily overlooking the thread's context.
Just going with the flow of the discussion.

And regarding the dreaded "WMD", where do you think they went?
 
Not necessarily overlooking the thread's context.
Just going with the flow of the discussion.
I was talking about you overlooking the context of the specific question on Obama adopting Bush policy on Iraq. That is the mother of all spins as it's true on the most bare essential technicalities of Bush signing the policy a month before Obama took over which spells out terms Obama had been articulating for years prior.
And regarding the dreaded "WMD", where do you think they went?

I'll go with what the experts have said, they were destroyed systematically through inspections and the majority of evidence that he possessed them was the product of US and British false intel plants during Operation Rockingham and Ahmed Chalabi.:2 cents:
 
Cool, gotta get out now before I get banned again!

Of course, to be honest the last time was a load of crap but I had no say in it so, I'll leave ya' with this...
Happens to the best of us....
I seem to remember him saying that Bush was a tool and everything he said or did was "gay"

Although I could be mistaken...
You are. But even as such, Obama was explicitly clear (for all who would actually listen) on a phased withdrawal from Iraq and a troop increase in Afghanistan. If Bush finally implements the policy Obama has been articulating for years, all that's left for Obama to do is increase troops in Afghanistan and get OBL...check and check.:hatsoff:


Regardless of what you mistakenly think Obama said, NOOOOOOBODY'S saying what 'Sick Rantorum' has said about WMDs being found in Iraq.:facepalm:

Now he's claiming off of his ass that McCain doesn't understand how interrogation works...:1orglaugh
 
Even though you know O'Bama's a tool!
:D

Rick Santorum said McCain doesn't understand how interrogation works.

Obama said he would increase troops in Afghanistan- check (now we have a chance to win).

He said he would withdraw our combat troops from Iraq- check.

He said he would get OBL- check.

Keep being a 'tool' Obama.:hatsoff:
 
Top