squallumz
knows petras secret: she farted.
[B][URL="https://www.freeones.com/jane-burgess said:Jane Burgess[/URL][/B], post: 6515327, member: 201847"]We should. I bet there are a lot of hot sluts there.
im on the 17. see u soon!
[B][URL="https://www.freeones.com/jane-burgess said:Jane Burgess[/URL][/B], post: 6515327, member: 201847"]We should. I bet there are a lot of hot sluts there.
He didn't call her a slut. He said why should we pay for birth control for women to go slutting around. I have to agree with him. I think birth control is a personal responsibility and you should have to pay for it yourself. I also think that Georgetown student is an idot for saying birth control costs around $3,000 a year. I would love to know what she uses that would cost that much a year.
He didn't call her a slut. He said why should we pay for birth control for women to go slutting around. I have to agree with him. I think birth control is a personal responsibility and you should have to pay for it yourself. I also think that Georgetown student is an idot for saying birth control costs around $3,000 a year. I would love to know what she uses that would cost that much a year.
Yeah, she's a lying publicity hungry skank.
Seriously...$3K a year for that shit? And her tuition at one of the prestigious law universities in the country is, what...$25K a year? Fucking brilliant one, this one.
And did you notice in her "testimony" she said her tuition is largely covered by us, the taxpayer, already.
And yeah, my girl took pills and I can assure you, they were not even remotely close to what this lying libtard is claiming. Unless, like you said, maybe she is getting gangbanged by the entire campus on a weekly basis.
He didn't call her a slut. He said why should we pay for birth control for women to go slutting around.
That could only be true if the only thing birth control did was allow people to "slut around". For all those normal woman out there that don't slut around it's a valuable tool not only so they can appropriately plan when and even if they want to get pregnant in the most reasonable, efficient, and ethical way they can but even more importantly not add people to our society they might not be able to take care of. You know, the thing people like Rush would bitch incessantly about an even greater amount if a situation came up where somebody did that.
It's not just something that is used so people can screw each other with lessened consequences, it's an extremely valuable thing for our entire society, and saves us much MUCH more in cost than the alternative. That's the reason we should pay for it, not the slutting around part. The fact Rush and people can't seem to grasp something like that is bewildering, especially considering how much more complaining and moral outrage would happen with the alternative.
Great point. You forgot to mention that contraception is essential to public health. In the case of Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown student, she is advocating for contraception to be covered under Georgetown University’s private insurance plan. Fluke became active on the issue after her friend developed ovarian cysts and found that the oral contraception she needed to stop the cysts from growing was not covered under the school’s insurance.
The top seven health benefits of taking the Pill
http://www.webmd.com/sex/birth-control/features/other-reasons-to-take-the-pill
Some people who are talking about birth control are just so uniformed on the issue. The fact is that there are actual health benefits that come from taking birth control. It has nothing to do with religious freedom, it's simply about women's health. Contrary to popular belief it isn't just used for women to 'slut around'
That's fine and dandy. Don't expect taxpayers to furnish it for them.
Funny how people have a problem with birth control being covered but they don't have a problem with Viagra being covered. Birth control isn't like Viagra, you don't pop a pill right before you know you're going to have sex
Viagra can be justified because ED is a medical condition.
Did you read this?
http://www.webmd.com/sex/birth-control/features/other-reasons-to-take-the-pill
So the fact that contraception lowers cancer risk, relieves Endometriosis, relieves Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome, those aren't medical conditions?
A bit of an over the top comment, but his basic point is that subsidized birth control is akin to taxpayers paying for women to have protected sex. So, by Rush's logic, if we are paying for this woman to have sex, then she's a slut. I get it.
Plus, in an excerpt of the testimony, the woman states, unprovoked, "I am not a promiscuous woman," and in my experience, the biggest sluts are commonly the ones who feel compelled to let people know that they aren't sluts. :2 cents:
[B][URL="https://www.freeones.com/jane-burgess said:Jane Burgess[/URL][/B], post: 6515327, member: 201847"]We should. I bet there are a lot of hot sluts there.
That could only be true if the only thing birth control did was allow people to "slut around". For all those normal woman out there that don't slut around it's a valuable tool not only so they can appropriately plan when and even if they want to get pregnant in the most reasonable, efficient, and ethical way they can but even more importantly not add people to our society they might not be able to take care of. You know, the thing people like Rush would bitch incessantly about an even greater amount if a situation came up where somebody did that.
It's not just something that is used so people can screw each other with lessened consequences, it's an extremely valuable thing for our entire society, and saves us much MUCH more in cost than the alternative. That's the reason we should pay for it, not the slutting around part. The fact Rush and people can't seem to grasp something like that is bewildering, especially considering how much more complaining and moral outrage would happen with the alternative.