REPORT: Reality Kings Network in trouble for ***

I understand that angle, I do. I don't want to be looking at **** performing sexual acts either. I just personally don't care about this girl being ******** or not because:

A) I don't belong to Reality Kings (or any other pay site for that matter).
B) Assuming she really was a ***** at the time, nobody ****** her to do anything against her will.
C) ******** **** willingly and consensually do things they're not legally old enough to do aaaaall the time and, in my opinion, this is no different.

So, I just don't care. Like I said before though, if she was ****** into making porn, then I'd care. Because, then it wouldn't be a case of some ********* girl trying to have a good time and make it as a star - it would then be a case of **** and that is something I strongly ****.

:2 cents:

How do you know that she wasn't ****** in some way? (and I assume that we could agree that *****/coercion extends beyond a *** to the head, and includes mental/emotional ***** and ********* of various sorts, but not merely "Hey baby, you should think about having sex for a porn site.")

:dunno:
 
I had started a thread reporting this last night.

Must have been one of the threads you shut down, Greg.

Honestly, I didn't even know how I should have posted that information. Ideally, you want to be sensitive about the situation, but you also want to inform your fellow FreeOnes posters about the situation as well.

**** is crazy.
 
Girls Gone Wild had a few hit and miss when they filmed a couple 16 and 17 year old girls because they were tricked. I'm sure it happens more oft than not in a behind the scenes kind of thing, especially when it comes to amateur work and newcomers.

In a age of porn where we have girls like Amai Liu all the way up to the girls of Nubile and the lot over at the company that hosts the sites myfirstanal, teensandblacks, and doubleteamedteen etc. etc. it is hard to discern just by looking at them anymore.

If RealityKings covered their tracks with the proper documenting and showing proof they went through the identification and age verification with what they were presented with they shouldn't have too many problems. Mainly need to keep the story straight so the rumor mill won't make this into a **** storm of theories and ruin them completely.
 
Girls Gone Wild had a few hit and miss when they filmed a couple 16 and 17 year old girls because they were tricked. I'm sure it happens more oft than not in a behind the scenes kind of thing, especially when it comes to amateur work and newcomers.

In a age of porn where we have girls like Amai Liu all the way up to the girls of Nubile and the lot over at the company that hosts the sites myfirstanal, teensandblacks, and doubleteamedteen, KimmyTeen etc. etc. it is hard to discern just by looking at them anymore.

If RealityKings covered their tracks with the proper documenting and showing proof they went through the identification and age verification with what they were presented with they shouldn't have too many problems. Mainly need to keep the story straight so the rumor mill won't make this into a **** storm of theories and ruin them completely.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh You sure know allot of these type sites ~whim... Uh, never mind.....
 

Darmund

Banned
How do you know that she wasn't ****** in some way? (and I assume that we could agree that *****/coercion extends beyond a *** to the head, and includes mental/emotional ***** and ********* of various sorts, but not merely "Hey baby, you should think about having sex for a porn site.")

:dunno:

In what demented universe does saying to a 15 or 16 year old, Hey baby, you should think about having sex for a porn site. constitute coercion? Do you even know what the word means?:facepalm:
 
WOW!! now this is the kinda **** crazy bible thumpers look for to shut down porn company.
 
If true, there would still technically be a case for statutory **** I imagine.

Mind you, googling for a proper source on this story, I happened upon another similar interesting story, that claimed back in 2007 that ''Risi Sims'' was also an ******** runaway doing pr0n.
 
18 is the worldwide cut-off age for a reason. Israel conformed to the consensus by raising its level from 16 to 18, UK LibDems saw themselves humiliated for their minority proposal to lower legal porn age to 16, Pierre Woodman (who usually laughs off any allegation of exploitation and coercion) became highly serious when a Latvian model claimed to having been shot by him when she was a *****.

Regardless of whose fault it is (and my money is on the girl here), porn with ******** girls is a very serious offense. Even Ukraine, a country of very dubious reputation on sexual matters, took the hard stance on its ******** scandal a few years ago.
 
Last edited:
18 is the worldwide cut-off age for a reason. Israel conformed to the consensus by raising its level from 16 to 18, UK LibDems saw themselves humiliated for their minority proposal to lower legal porn age to 16, Pierre Woodman (who usually laughs off any allegation of exploitation and coercion) became highly serious when a Latvian model claimed to having been shot by him when she was a *****.

Regardless of whose fault it is (and my money is on the girl here), porn with ******** girls is a very serious offense. Even Ukraine, a country of very dubious reputation on sexual matters, took the hard stance on its ******** scandal a few years ago.

So are they liable only in the country of residence, or do they have liability in all countries of distribution?
 
I appreciate the levity of the situation and the debate it should normally provoke.....but!

Given the subject matter and the possiblity for a massive body count left in its **** when it finally does get closed, is it really wise to continue it?

Freeones is nothing if not strict.
 
Given the subject matter and the possiblity for a massive body count left in its **** when it finally does get closed, is it really wise to continue it?

As long as the discussion doesn't derail, there is no reason to close the thread.
I've said it before: Being the one who deemed the girl Babe-thread worthy when she was legit, I feel a special responsibility for this issue. No links, no pictures, no names ... continue to tread along that line!
 
They've removed her scene from C*fiesta now anywho. The lawyers are probably getting all there ducks in a row as we speak. :D
 

ChefChiTown

The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
How do you know that she wasn't ****** in some way? (and I assume that we could agree that *****/coercion extends beyond a *** to the head, and includes mental/emotional ***** and ********* of various sorts, but not merely "Hey baby, you should think about having sex for a porn site.")

:dunno:

I don't know the rules of what we are/aren't allowed to post in regards to subject matter like this, so I won't include links to anything, but, I Googled this story because I was curious as to what the details of this case were. And, from what I found, this girl ran away from home earlier this year. her parents filed a missing persons report (obviously under her real name) and gave the police some aliases she used. One of which happened to be part of a porn actresses name, whom they now believe to be the girl in question.

Anyway, she ran away from home. To me, that means that she didn't take too kindly to authority and ran away to do what she wanted. Do I know that for a fact? No, I don't. But, I find it extremely hard to believe that somebody within a well known adult production company would ***** an ********* girl to make pornography for them.

And, getting talked into doing something isn't being ******. I was talked into smoking pot when I was younger and I was naive and stupid enough to go along with it. But, if I was caught smoking weed, explaining to an officer of the law that I had been talked into it isn't going to free me from any responsibility for my actions.
 
If true, there would still technically be a case for statutory **** I imagine.

Mind you, googling for a proper source on this story, I happened upon another similar interesting story, that claimed back in 2007 that ''Risi Sims'' was also an ******** runaway doing pr0n.

 

Supafly

Logged Off 4 Freedom of Speech Restrictions
Bronze Member
Picture or it didn't happen :)
 
Top