I don't think there will be any DLC at all. They focus on the online thing and that's it.
Red Dead Redemption 2
- Thread starter sean miguel
- Start date
Maybe... but I think it would be awesome if they made dlc like undead nightmare again.
It's not legit. Neither is the rumor of a remake of the first game. Both rumors originated from a reddit user who admitted that he spread the rumors as an "experiment", because he always wanted to spread rumors in video game culture.
https://comicbook.com/gaming/2019/07/24/red-dead-redemption-2-dlc-remake-rumor-debunked/
I started a new game. A moose came across with a perfect pelt and: I couldn't get a clear shot
DAMN YEAH I got my perfect moose pelt today!!!!!
I need 3-4 more for some parts for outfits
I solved the cave paintings side mission today
Wait. So you're trying to dress up like a moose?
I now spend most of my time looking for "the" horse, that is perfect for my gameplay. I am riding a Dutch and an Hungarian currently.
When I first saw Micah I just thought he was bad but in a cool kinda way. Who could have thought that this asshole turned into an asshole?
For being such a well put together game I gotta say.... The ending sucked balls. I thought it was just another mission and all of a sudden.... The End
I wanted to kill Dutch so bad I could taste it
You couldn't kill Dutch. He doesn't die until Red Dead Redemption. RDR 2 is a prequel.
That's exactly what I mean, I wanted to kill Dutch but game wouldn't allow. I was hoping that would have been included in the ending.
Spoiler Alert:
It did piss me off that Arthur didn't get to be the one to kill Micah near the ending of the game. I understand that Dutch had to live because of the events of the first game, and somebody had to be the object of John's revenge at the end, but it didn't seem as satisfying as if it could have been Arthur offing him with his last bit of life he had left on top of the mountain. I can also see them doing it for the parallels that could be drawn from the first game, but even there it didn't seem quite as satisfying as John's son coming back to avenge his father's death in that one.
I did find the little bit of happy time John got with Jack, Abigail, Uncle, Sadie, and Charles at the end to be nice though, especially as Sadie and Charles where some of my favorite characters in the game.
It did piss me off that Arthur didn't get to be the one to kill Micah near the ending of the game. I understand that Dutch had to live because of the events of the first game, and somebody had to be the object of John's revenge at the end, but it didn't seem as satisfying as if it could have been Arthur offing him with his last bit of life he had left on top of the mountain. I can also see them doing it for the parallels that could be drawn from the first game, but even there it didn't seem quite as satisfying as John's son coming back to avenge his father's death in that one.
I did find the little bit of happy time John got with Jack, Abigail, Uncle, Sadie, and Charles at the end to be nice though, especially as Sadie and Charles where some of my favorite characters in the game.
The new Frontier Pursuits update for Red Dead Online dropped today. You can choose to be a Bounty Hunter, a Collector, a Trader or all 3 if you have the gold. I chose the path of the Bounty Hunter. This is my character with my new horse, Madison Ivy.:clap:
Apparently, PS+ subscribers get the Trader role for free rather than the 15 gold that it costs. I think I'm going to try the Trader role in addition to the bounty hunting to add to my bank account. Make no mistake though,
Similar threads
