She has the best ass in the biz, that's it. I wouldn't put too much attention to that kind of poll. People vote for their favorite girl and sometimes It's just based on what a girl does or doesn't do, and Rachel doesn't do a few things. But she has the best ass.

Spoken like a true Rachel Starr fanatic. Kudos! :goodpost:

Here's a pic for speaking the unequivocal truth:


rachel-starr-hugeass-bigtits-2.jpg
 
I would like to know also why she uses comdoms with BB, about the anal why you say she obviously loves it? If she loved it she would do anal more often, and I'm not holding my breath, even if she does another one, the 2 she has done aren't that good, so i don't care if she does another one.

Maybe it's not about the money for her when it comes to those scenes. Just a thought.

She's previously stated on this board (I think sometime last year) and on twitter that she absolutely loves anal in her personal life and does it all the time. And that her not doing her another one was simply because companies weren't paying her the rate that she demanded, but otherwise she would love to do it. Now that's all perfectly reasonable in theory, but that's why I always compare her career to Asa Akira's and which of their porn business models actually makes them more money in the end. Asa accepts less money than Rachel to do a lot more anal scenes (tho obviously she's paid much more than a normal non-anal b/g scene), but also loves it in her personal life anyway, so its a win-win for her. Meanwhile, Rachel will ONLY do anal for a HUGE amount of money and therefore she's so far only found 2 companies in the last 2.5 years willing to pay that amount of $ and therefore makes far less money holding out for the giant paydays even though she also loves it in real life as well. So of these 2 pornstars' business models, 1 of them makes business sense and the other doesn't - especially considering they both say they love anal and they both obviously enjoy making more money.

IMO its must just be ego that's keeping Rachel from doing more anal and therefore making more money. She'd prefer the prestige of occasionally making a porn company "break the bank" to higher her services over the actual reality of making more money over time. Lets say there's a $1,000 pay bump in doing an anal scene. If Asa has done (lets say) 25 anal scenes in 2.5 years, that's an extra $25,000 that she's made doing the same number of scenes she was already going to do anyway and for doing something extra in a scene that she already loves doing anyway at home. Now unless Rachel (who's probably made 40-50 scenes in that same time frame) made $25,000 for that single 2nd anal scene alone (which there's no way she did) then I don't think her plan works in the end (even if it is a noble effort to try and get companies to pay their stars more). At some point the free market has spoken.
 
She's previously stated on this board (I think sometime last year) and on twitter that she absolutely loves anal in her personal life and does it all the time. And that her not doing her another one was simply because companies weren't paying her the rate that she demanded, but otherwise she would love to do it. Now that's all perfectly reasonable in theory, but that's why I always compare her career to Asa Akira's and which of their porn business models actually makes them more money in the end. Asa accepts less money than Rachel to do a lot more anal scenes (tho obviously she's paid much more than a normal non-anal b/g scene), but also loves it in her personal life anyway, so its a win-win for her. Meanwhile, Rachel will ONLY do anal for a HUGE amount of money and therefore she's so far only found 2 companies in the last 2.5 years willing to pay that amount of $ and therefore makes far less money holding out for the giant paydays even though she also loves it in real life as well. So of these 2 pornstars' business models, 1 of them makes business sense and the other doesn't - especially considering they both say they love anal and they both obviously enjoy making more money.

IMO its must just be ego that's keeping Rachel from doing more anal and therefore making more money. She'd prefer the prestige of occasionally making a porn company "break the bank" to higher her services over the actual reality of making more money over time. Lets say there's a $1,000 pay bump in doing an anal scene. If Asa has done (lets say) 25 anal scenes in 2.5 years, that's an extra $25,000 that she's made doing the same number of scenes she was already going to do anyway and for doing something extra in a scene that she already loves doing anyway at home. Now unless Rachel (who's probably made 40-50 scenes in that same time frame) made $25,000 for that single 2nd anal scene alone (which there's no way she did) then I don't think her plan works in the end (even if it is a noble effort to try and get companies to pay their stars more). At some point the free market has spoken.

Shut up about her doing anal already. If she doesn't want to do it then she doesn't want to. Quit your bitching, plenty of other girls in the biz do anal for you to enjoy. I personally enjoy Rachel's non-anal scenes and I think she does too.
 
Shut up about her doing anal already. If she doesn't want to do it then she doesn't want to. Quit your bitching, plenty of other girls in the biz do anal for you to enjoy. I personally enjoy Rachel's non-anal scenes and I think she does too.

If you just wanna use this thread to simply post links and reply with comments that say "Rachel is fucking hot!!!", then go for it kiddo. But when the we feel like having an actual conversion about something... and if you don't wanna join in, then simply don't. And then just go back to posting your next link. Its as simple as that. There's no need to get testy. Example: Lets say I'm not interested in Rachel doing IR. But when someone posts begging for her to do take some BBC, I'm not gonna freak out and try to shut down the conversation. I'd simply ignore it OR at most I might post a well written rebuttal of some sort.

So you don't need to come to a someone's defense when they're not being attacked in the 1st place. And for the record: I'm a huge fan of Rachel's. Kind of like how I'm a big fan of Chris Nolan, but I still had a lot of problems with Dark Knight Rises. But I'm still a fan. Simple, right?
 

DuanCulo

Moderator
Staff member
If you just wanna use this thread to simply post links and reply with comments that say "Rachel is fucking hot!!!", then go for it kiddo. But when the we feel like having an actual conversion about something... and if you don't wanna join in, then simply don't. And then just go back to posting your next link. Its as simple as that. There's no need to get testy. Example: Lets say I'm not interested in Rachel doing IR. But when someone posts begging for her to do take some BBC, I'm not gonna freak out and try to shut down the conversation. I'd simply ignore it OR at most I might post a well written rebuttal of some sort.

So you don't need to come to a someone's defense when they're not being attacked in the 1st place. And for the record: I'm a huge fan of Rachel's. Kind of like how I'm a big fan of Chris Nolan, but I still had a lot of problems with Dark Knight Rises. But I'm still a fan. Simple, right?

i agree for the most part. lot of dudes here have a serious 'save-a-ho' complex. yes we all love rachel, or whichever pornstar, but it doesn't mean someone cannot post something they would really like to see her do as long as they are not bashing her or calling her out her name because she doesn't. no need to jump down someone's throat for having a different opinion or wanting more from her
 
Top