Ack, no way, couldn't take the rubber burn.stevenits1 said:
I want floppy breasts to flow around around my cock, not to simply feel like muscle on her body.
But to each his own.
Question for all the Tit-lovers
- Thread starter RogueWolf
- Start date
I want floppy breasts to flow around around my cock, not to simply feel like muscle on her body.
But to each his own.
Superfly
Closed Account
Id def go for the naturals, Briana Banks is one of the few with implants i really like in porn
I like wider, hourglass women. In that case, they typically have wider, rounder breasts. That means they are less "torpedo" and when they age, they don't sag as much, let alone the woman has less back trouble because she is more "well built." At the same time, they are still very soft.
But to me, a woman's breasts are NOTHING without the hourglass figure. I want a wide set of hips with a wide bust. The stomache should curve in, away from the bust and hips, but it doesn't have to be slender or flat. My big thing is a woman, turned to her side, with a very full bust in one direction, and then a very full rear in the other. Now THAT is a "pin-up" to me!
The wider her bust and hips are, the more I don't mind a stomach -- in fact, I like a little "tight, but defined" stomach, as many [former] female athletes or slender FFWs have. When she's turned to her side, it should barely show and then "dip in" as we move down towards her hips.
But if she has a bit of weight, her figure can handle it. In fact, for many FFW lovelies, when they gain weight, it distributes well -- especially into their bust and rear. Autumn-Jade at her heaviest is an ideal example. But I have nothing against wide hardbodies, and Donna Edmundson (several years after her original Playboy centerfold when she widened), is my favorite hardbody FFW.
As far as silicone, I really prefer it on an already FFW woman so it doesn't show as much. My favorite pin-up of all-time like that is Dakota Kelly -- she already had breasts a full set of hips, thighs and matching rear, although she probably didn't need the added bust. Amanda White is another FFW lovely that the job didn't look bad on, although I agree she probably didn't need it either.
I definitely cannot stand an A-cup woman who gets C-D dups. I'd rather have a FFW or even a curvy BBW with B cups than see a thin woman with completely fake C-D cups -- at least not nude (breasts covered would be tolerable in many cases). Although typically hourglass FFW/BBW have C+ cups anyway, and the B cups on BBW are due to the fact that the woman is more of a "bell" shape than a curvy, hourglass BBW.
People might classify me as a guy who likes "big" women. I am not, I HATE the "bell" shape. And I DO go for more slender FFW or even thinner women, as long as they have hourglass shape. ERC and Jelena, two of the women in the recent Playboy vote, are perfect examples of curvy hourglasses on very, very tight frames. If they are brunette and hourglass, I love'em.
In fact, probably the woman that comes closest to perfection (and God Herself) is Yulia Nova (attached).
But to me, a woman's breasts are NOTHING without the hourglass figure. I want a wide set of hips with a wide bust. The stomache should curve in, away from the bust and hips, but it doesn't have to be slender or flat. My big thing is a woman, turned to her side, with a very full bust in one direction, and then a very full rear in the other. Now THAT is a "pin-up" to me!
The wider her bust and hips are, the more I don't mind a stomach -- in fact, I like a little "tight, but defined" stomach, as many [former] female athletes or slender FFWs have. When she's turned to her side, it should barely show and then "dip in" as we move down towards her hips.
But if she has a bit of weight, her figure can handle it. In fact, for many FFW lovelies, when they gain weight, it distributes well -- especially into their bust and rear. Autumn-Jade at her heaviest is an ideal example. But I have nothing against wide hardbodies, and Donna Edmundson (several years after her original Playboy centerfold when she widened), is my favorite hardbody FFW.
As far as silicone, I really prefer it on an already FFW woman so it doesn't show as much. My favorite pin-up of all-time like that is Dakota Kelly -- she already had breasts a full set of hips, thighs and matching rear, although she probably didn't need the added bust. Amanda White is another FFW lovely that the job didn't look bad on, although I agree she probably didn't need it either.
I definitely cannot stand an A-cup woman who gets C-D dups. I'd rather have a FFW or even a curvy BBW with B cups than see a thin woman with completely fake C-D cups -- at least not nude (breasts covered would be tolerable in many cases). Although typically hourglass FFW/BBW have C+ cups anyway, and the B cups on BBW are due to the fact that the woman is more of a "bell" shape than a curvy, hourglass BBW.
People might classify me as a guy who likes "big" women. I am not, I HATE the "bell" shape. And I DO go for more slender FFW or even thinner women, as long as they have hourglass shape. ERC and Jelena, two of the women in the recent Playboy vote, are perfect examples of curvy hourglasses on very, very tight frames. If they are brunette and hourglass, I love'em.
In fact, probably the woman that comes closest to perfection (and God Herself) is Yulia Nova (attached).
Last edited by a moderator:
Kelly Bell and Fembomb are perfect examples of how a woman should look like!!!
hi! i like natural and firm breasts. when i learn that a supermodel
i like has had implants, i feel turned off.
can anyone confirm whether krystal steal has implants?
i want to know whether she has natural breasts or no.
what i have seen from her videos is that she never allows any of
her partners to play with her breasts. most models just want to show
their breasts but do not involve them in love making. this is really not sexy.
i like has had implants, i feel turned off.
can anyone confirm whether krystal steal has implants?
i want to know whether she has natural breasts or no.
what i have seen from her videos is that she never allows any of
her partners to play with her breasts. most models just want to show
their breasts but do not involve them in love making. this is really not sexy.
I am a fan natural tits. I think that they usually fit a woman's frame and look better than most implants.
I prefer natural large ones. Also, like enhanced ones such as Veronica Zemanova and Ava Ramon. However the silicone shouldn't over weigh the natural body like Ava Devine.
If you like big naturals I would definitely look at Rucca Page she has an amazing body but there is something about her that is just beautiful... maybe its the tits.
The bigger the better, so I have to go with silicone. Natural is good, but almost never approaches the size of someone like Minka, or Lisa Lipps, “with very few exceptions” without a lot of sagging.
Been three years ...
Been three years since I posted in this thread. Since then, I've produced a number of threads and polls trying to find the answer.
I started on breasts ...
- Multi-Answer Superpoll: Fake and Real Breasts
And then started to focus on hips and overall shape ...
- Full fucking hips (and tummy) ...
- Female body shapes, width and sizes ...
Didn't totally explain my love of select, silicone princess to many, and I generally avoided such. Then I think shortly after I discovered Devyn Devine, who reminds me so much of my wife, I started to focus again on overall body, only shorter women, as well as another poll on flopping breasts:
- Shorter, Stockier Apple-Hourglass Women ...
- Very big, hanging, soft and -- most importantly -- very floppy breasts ...
And then a further refinement on the "hips" to appreciate thinner women, like Shay Laren and others I completely adore, even if far more rarely than fuller women:
- Thin (not full) fucking hips ...
But I still came back to all those '90s silicone princesses that drove me nuts -- from Dakota Kelly to Traci Topps. Then I realized it's been all about matching those wide hips to wide bust, and I adored many silicone lovelies because of that size and width both at the hips and the chest.
- Silicone with full, fucking hips (and no boney pelvis-tummy) ...
As well as the reason why I started to lust for full figured women in the first place, the first time I saw my first FFW girlfriend in a teddy, and that high-cut teddy just cutting up her stomach and showing off that wide, fanging hip right up to her mid-section ...
- High-cut, one-piece outfits on wide, hourglass women ...
I still can't set any "standard" for myself, but I do know that some people seem to set too many for themselves. Most people would assume I'd never go for ... say ... a "Vivid girl" but Kira Kener had a perfect, hourglass body, even if enhanced. I feel like an oblivious fool but I also, and only recently discovered Memphis Monroe is of the same type -- 5'6" with 36-25-36 and, like Kira, not your stock model beauty atop either (but far hotter -- and I'm not a blonde lover in the least bit, much less one with roots, but damn she's hard to ignore).
I guess I love curves combined with not-so-plain looks. And when I say not-so-plain, I'm talking about Julia Roberts, Brittany Spears and Jessica Simpson being "plain." I like a little flavor. What people consider "perfection" I consider "plain." I actually love a lot of women that people say are "butterface," especially fuller women with that little bit of pudge. But I'd say I'm hardly alone, because a lot of men go for even thinner actresses with a more round and puffy face (Gillian Anderson comes to mind, just looking at her from the neck-up). Brunettes catch my fancy, but some really unique -- again, nothing like what people think is "perfect" -- blondes knock the shit out of me. I think Katerina Hartlova is what I'd call "Barbie" but without the "perfect blonde" look ("oh, she's too fat" or "her face isn't right" and what not) in the media's eyes (while still being unreal and ultra-beautiful to the majority of men).
In the '90s, you had a major floodgate broken with lots of wider, fuller, even if silicone, women that had unique looks. Yeah, some of were nothing of interest to me, and too plastic. But I even went for Letha Weapon's look, along with Traci Topps, Nikki Knockers and -- my favorite pin-up -- Dakota Kelly. Hell, I was still so into Dakota when she gained weight and lost that unreal, bubble butt-breast S-curve hourglass. Just women of unique looks and unique curves. Hell, I still jack to Tabatha Towers and Honey Moons, because they were just unique as fuck, and it's harder to find that in mainstream porn this decade.
Been three years since I posted in this thread. Since then, I've produced a number of threads and polls trying to find the answer.
I started on breasts ...
- Multi-Answer Superpoll: Fake and Real Breasts
And then started to focus on hips and overall shape ...
- Full fucking hips (and tummy) ...
- Female body shapes, width and sizes ...
Didn't totally explain my love of select, silicone princess to many, and I generally avoided such. Then I think shortly after I discovered Devyn Devine, who reminds me so much of my wife, I started to focus again on overall body, only shorter women, as well as another poll on flopping breasts:
- Shorter, Stockier Apple-Hourglass Women ...
- Very big, hanging, soft and -- most importantly -- very floppy breasts ...
And then a further refinement on the "hips" to appreciate thinner women, like Shay Laren and others I completely adore, even if far more rarely than fuller women:
- Thin (not full) fucking hips ...
But I still came back to all those '90s silicone princesses that drove me nuts -- from Dakota Kelly to Traci Topps. Then I realized it's been all about matching those wide hips to wide bust, and I adored many silicone lovelies because of that size and width both at the hips and the chest.
- Silicone with full, fucking hips (and no boney pelvis-tummy) ...
As well as the reason why I started to lust for full figured women in the first place, the first time I saw my first FFW girlfriend in a teddy, and that high-cut teddy just cutting up her stomach and showing off that wide, fanging hip right up to her mid-section ...
- High-cut, one-piece outfits on wide, hourglass women ...
I still can't set any "standard" for myself, but I do know that some people seem to set too many for themselves. Most people would assume I'd never go for ... say ... a "Vivid girl" but Kira Kener had a perfect, hourglass body, even if enhanced. I feel like an oblivious fool but I also, and only recently discovered Memphis Monroe is of the same type -- 5'6" with 36-25-36 and, like Kira, not your stock model beauty atop either (but far hotter -- and I'm not a blonde lover in the least bit, much less one with roots, but damn she's hard to ignore).
I guess I love curves combined with not-so-plain looks. And when I say not-so-plain, I'm talking about Julia Roberts, Brittany Spears and Jessica Simpson being "plain." I like a little flavor. What people consider "perfection" I consider "plain." I actually love a lot of women that people say are "butterface," especially fuller women with that little bit of pudge. But I'd say I'm hardly alone, because a lot of men go for even thinner actresses with a more round and puffy face (Gillian Anderson comes to mind, just looking at her from the neck-up). Brunettes catch my fancy, but some really unique -- again, nothing like what people think is "perfect" -- blondes knock the shit out of me. I think Katerina Hartlova is what I'd call "Barbie" but without the "perfect blonde" look ("oh, she's too fat" or "her face isn't right" and what not) in the media's eyes (while still being unreal and ultra-beautiful to the majority of men).
In the '90s, you had a major floodgate broken with lots of wider, fuller, even if silicone, women that had unique looks. Yeah, some of were nothing of interest to me, and too plastic. But I even went for Letha Weapon's look, along with Traci Topps, Nikki Knockers and -- my favorite pin-up -- Dakota Kelly. Hell, I was still so into Dakota when she gained weight and lost that unreal, bubble butt-breast S-curve hourglass. Just women of unique looks and unique curves. Hell, I still jack to Tabatha Towers and Honey Moons, because they were just unique as fuck, and it's harder to find that in mainstream porn this decade.
Well, Prof Voluptuary, thx for ur in-depth discussion, it may indeed be a scientific question, but ...
Yeah, I must say, me too... :ban:
Yeah, I must say, me too... :ban:
Medium, even small, breasts are attractive as hell to me, more so than fake tities. I'm an ass man, all the way. My ex had 34B's, and that was fine with me. I need meat on the ass, more than the tits. 34C's would probably be my essential tit size.
busenbust
^^^^
I prefer big tit Porno Stars such as: Kayla Kleevage, Chessie Moore, Brittany O'Neil, Lisa Chest, Sofia Staks, Letha Weapons, Wendy Whoppers et al.
Similar threads
