Re: Prettiest In Porn
I'll never (well rarely) debate tastes (or lack of it)!
What I will say, is that my standards for porn models is pretty low, my standards for softcore much higher, and for celebrities higher still. Porn actresses have one purpose... softcore models seem to get more glamourous and push the creativity a little further.
Let's face it, 90% of the women in porn films would never get on the cover of a mainstream mag like Vogue or Cosmopolitan, even with the layers of makeup they often wear
That is true, but maybe even in the higher 90's. The model is an extremely unique type, often at odds with what men look for in porn and softcore models: very tall and thin, straight waisted as opposed to medium to short height with an hourglass figure (often exaggerated). Even poor Heidi Klum, maybe the bustiest of models, can't compete with the runway and covergirls - lack of height and leg length ratio to start. I'm not sorry to say that I adore models (but that should be obvious, no?
). 5'10-6' / 178-183cm, legs forever, stunning long faces even without a bit of makeup....
I think the original point still nails it - porn models can make themselves attractive to men, but IMO rarely, if ever, could occupy the highest ranks in the beauty
industry.