Porn queen Jenna Jameson endorses Mitt Romney for president

[Mayhem]

Jenna is a business woman. She knows, like all business owners, that Romney will protect her business and help it thrive. She knows that the great Obumbler in office will NOT help her business. In fact, the great Obumbler will raise her taxes and create many new taxes (such as Obamacare, and Cap & Trade) that will stifle positive growth. Jenna is a smart woman. Much smarter than any worthless, uneducated, greedy Hollywood idiot actor/actress.

As I said above, some people are too fucking stoopid to see sarcasm staring them right in the face.

 

[Fatfishblu]

As I said above, some people are too fucking stoopid to see sarcasm staring them right in the face.

Cant' believe there are people "fucking stoopid" [sic] enough to read the Huffington Post.

 

[Shifty]

Truly, the plastic fork of campaign endorsements.

 

[Rey C.]

Laugh all you want you bubble dweller. You know damn straight Obama is destroying business. I would vote for a rock over Obama. Anything is better than 4 more years of misery.

No, I can't say that I know damn straight any such thing. I know that there are more than a few people who wouldn't know a balance sheet from an income statement, who claim that "Obama is destroying business". But from what I've seen, most of those people rely on hyperbole and emotion rather than facts and data to back up that claim.

According to S&P, with 88.1% of US companies having reported, Q3 2011 operating earnings are on pace to total $25.42 for the S&P 500. On a four quarter trailing basis, earnings for the S&P 500 are set to total $94.77, which would eclipse the old record of $91.47 set in Q2 2007.

So, in the 3rd quarter of 2011, earnings for the S&P 500 set an all time record. But you say that the sky is falling?

And...

After bottoming out in Q3 2009, earnings have now rebounded by 139% in the course of two years.

Things are not peaches & cream right now. We most certainly do have some serious issues. But from a period of increasing productivity and record earnings to utter destruction? Maybe you need to ease off the Fox News or just take a macro Econ course. Whatever works for ya...

Look, I'm not pro-Obama so much as I just like to make fun of wingnuts who piece together arguments with bubble gum and twine. But one thing I can say with relative certainty: anyone in the porn business who is dumb enough to think that Romney, or any so-called "social conservative", is going to be good for them, deserves what they get. Feeling sorry for stupid people is just not something I've ever done.

Trueman, the president of Morality in Media, contacted the Romney campaign earlier this year about the “untreated pandemic” of Internet pornography. “They got back to us right away,” he said.

Bob Flores, another former Justice Department official who prosecuted pornographers, accompanied Trueman to an hour-long meeting with Romney foreign and legal policy director Alex Wong, Trueman said.

“Wong assured us that Romney is very concerned with this, and that if he’s elected these laws will be enforced,” Trueman told TheDC. “They promised to vigorously enforce federal adult obscenity laws.”

Trueman said he would like for Romney to speak publicly about cracking down on porn, but believes Romney avoids the subject because he “saw that Rick Santorum got beat up in the mainstream press for being so forthright.”

 

[xfire]

Romney campaign quietly promised ‘vigorous’ porn crackdown, Reagan prosecutor says

Here's the article Rey C. quoted from. Can someone that's pro-Romney please explain this? Will? Fatbluefish? ballboyzano? Anyone?


http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/18/r...gorous-porn-crackdown-reagan-prosecutor-says/

Romney campaign quietly promised ‘vigorous’ porn crackdown, Reagan prosecutor says

Former Justice Department official Patrick Trueman, who proudly participated in federal pornography prosecutions during their “heyday” in the late 1980s and early 1990s, told The Daily Caller that Mitt Romney’s campaign assured him that Romney would “vigorously” prosecute pornographers if elected president.

Trueman, the president of Morality in Media, contacted the Romney campaign earlier this year about the “untreated pandemic” of Internet pornography. “They got back to us right away,” he said.

Bob Flores, another former Justice Department official who prosecuted pornographers, accompanied Trueman to an hour-long meeting with Romney foreign and legal policy director Alex Wong, Trueman said.

“Wong assured us that Romney is very concerned with this, and that if he’s elected these laws will be enforced,” Trueman told TheDC. ”They promised to vigorously enforce federal adult obscenity laws.”

Trueman said he would like for Romney to speak publicly about cracking down on porn, but believes Romney avoids the subject because he “saw that Rick Santorum got beat up in the mainstream press for being so forthright.”

“With respect to Romney, I believe him,” said Trueman, “but I’d like to make sure he means it.”

Trueman said convictions for distributing porn that displays group sex, simulated rape, incest, psuedo child porn, violence or unusual fetishes — such as “scat” porn — are relatively easy. But, he said, “unless it’s just waist-up nudity of women’s breasts it probably can be found obscene somewhere in the country.”

Juries can find pornography obscene, and therefore unlawful, if the material violates subjective “community standards.”

Companies, rather than individuals, are the targets of federal prosecutions, Trueman said. “You don’t go after your neighbor who happens to get a magazine in the mail,” he explained.

UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh told TheDC earlier this year, however, that the Supreme Court has ruled that private possession of pornography is constitutionally protected, but that private receipt is not — meaning that individuals, too, could be prosecuted.

Recalling the tactics used when he served for two years in the Reagan administration and four years in the George H.W. Bush administration, Trueman said, “we had a target list put together by the LAPD and the FBI that consisted of about 60-65 top producers and distributors in the fifty states. We prosecuted them, and most of them went out of business or went to jail.”

After President Bill Clinton assumed office, Trueman said, the number of porn prosecutions plummeted and they have remained rare ever since.

Trueman expressed disappointment in the relatively low number of pornography prosecutions during the George W. Bush administration. “My understanding was that after 9/11 hit, [Attorney General John Ashcroft] was advised that he’d look frivolous if he did pornography cases,” Trueman said.

“We’ve had a couple administrations that didn’t do much and now we have widespread addiction and other problems,” he added, “but the laws are still good.”

Just a few federal inquests, said Trueman, would likely frighten most companies — such as hotels and cable providers — into completely disassociating themselves from porn. Most U.S.-based porn websites, he said, could easily be taken offline during a Romney administration, because a handful of companies manage vast online porn networks. Foreign websites, he admitted, “would be much more difficult” to address.

Earlier this year Romney released a statement promising “strict enforcement of our nation’s obscenity laws,” presumably indicating a willingness to bring back porn prosecutions. Campaign spokeswoman Andrea Saul has not responded to TheDC’s requests for clarification.

Libertarian Party presidential candidate Gary Johnson opposes Romney’s advocacy of prosecuting pornographers.

Johnson told TheDC that ”the decision to view or not view pornography should rest with individual adults,” and said he opposes “the government making adult choices for us in the privacy of our own homes, and trampling the First Amendment in the process.”

Not everyone, however, believes that Romney is serious about enforcing obscenity laws. “I don’t see any danger coming from Romney when it comes to porn. It’s just not there,” gay porn titan Michael Lucas told Yahoo! News’ Chris Moody in March. Lucas, who has endorsed Romney, added, “I think he will be much better than President Obama.”

 

[PirateKing]

What happened to you Jenna?! You look terrible and now you're voting republican?!

I blame Ortiz.

 

[Fatfishblu]

Re: Romney campaign quietly promised ‘vigorous’ porn crackdown, Reagan prosecutor say

Here's the article Rey C. quoted from. Can someone that's pro-Romney please explain this? Will? Fatbluefish? ballboyzano? Anyone?


http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/18/r...gorous-porn-crackdown-reagan-prosecutor-says/

Why are you worried about Republicans censoring the internet when both parties are equally to blame. In fact, if one looks at the bipartisan voting, you will see more Democrats voted for the CDA back in the mid-90's and recently, for SOPA. Explain that.

If I were you, I wouldn't be worried about Romney censoring the internet, I'd be more concerned as to what is currently occurring in the White House. Here's an article for your reading pleasure:

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-v...rity-bill-obama-weighs-executive-order-option

Does this sound like a good idea? Obama acting as dictator to preside over all internet content? Not good for anyone.

 

[xfire]

Re: Romney campaign quietly promised ‘vigorous’ porn crackdown, Reagan prosecutor say

Why are you worried about Republicans censoring the internet when both parties are equally to blame. In fact, if one looks at the bipartisan voting, you will see more Democrats voted for the CDA back in the mid-90's and recently, for SOPA. Explain that.

If I were you, I wouldn't be worried about Romney censoring the internet, I'd be more concerned as to what is currently occurring in the White House. Here's an article for your reading pleasure:

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-v...rity-bill-obama-weighs-executive-order-option

Does this sound like a good idea? Obama acting as dictator to preside over all internet content? Not good for anyone.

Thanks for dodging the question. I don't support any censorship of the internet, does that explain my position well enough?

I'm not worried about Romney merely censoring the internet, rather, I'm worried about Romney putting all the OCSM's in jail. I'm worried about Romney taking his social conservative agenda and ramming it up ALL of our asses. How can someone claim to be conservative when they want MORE interference into the choices people make!?

 

[Fatfishblu]

Re: Romney campaign quietly promised ‘vigorous’ porn crackdown, Reagan prosecutor say

Thanks for dodging the question. I don't support any censorship of the internet, does that explain my position well enough?

I'm not worried about Romney merely censoring the internet, rather, I'm worried about Romney putting all the OCSM's in jail. I'm worried about Romney taking his social conservative agenda and ramming it up ALL of our asses. How can someone claim to be conservative when they want MORE interference into the choices people make!?

Quit being so delusional. Romney's a Jackass in disguise. None of what you talk about will ever happen. If it does, it will come as "New Regulations" brought about by the Democrats. Haven't you read "When Atlas Shrugged?" Too much Government kills business. Who is John Galt?

 

[xfire]

Re: Romney campaign quietly promised ‘vigorous’ porn crackdown, Reagan prosecutor say

Quit being so delusional. Romney's a Jackass in disguise. None of what you talk about will ever happen. If it does, it will come as "New Regulations" brought about by the Democrats. Haven't you read "When Atlas Shrugged?" Too much Government kills business. Who is John Galt?

"Romney's a jackass in disguise."

Great! Vote for Obama, the real fucking deal. Half-honkey, ALL Donkey!

And, if you think, "none of what you talk about will ever happen", you, sir, are the delusional one. Just go back and read the article I posted. It's already happened under Reagan and Bush 41.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/18/r...gorous-porn-crackdown-reagan-prosecutor-says/

 

[Rey C.]

Re: Romney campaign quietly promised ‘vigorous’ porn crackdown, Reagan prosecutor say

Quit being so delusional. None of what you talk about will ever happen.

That's right, xfire... it's not as if there was a morality brigade at the DoJ , backed by Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, et al, when Ed Meese was running the show. It's not as if distributors and studios were hounded out of business. Just because the social neocons say that they're going to start cracking down on porn (and they've done it before), that doesn't mean that they'll actually do it again. What Fatfishblu is saying is that the social neocons are liars. Yes, you're just being delusional. Why can't you see the truth, xfire?! What's wrong with you, man? It's as clear as the nose on your face! Repeat after me (and Fatfishblu): Democrats bad... Republicans good. Liberals bad... Conservatives good.

Obama is a socialist, communist, Nazi, Kenyan, half-breed, reptilian moon Jew. And if we don't get him out of the White House in November, all the companies in America are going to go out of business or move to Europe. Things were going great before Big Daddy O got in. Everybody had jobs and everybody had a smile on their face. We had "free market solutions" to our problems and the only issues that were serious were the ones that libs and Dems created. Stop being delusional. And vote GOP in November or we'll all die!

 

[Supafly]

What happened to you Jenna?! You look terrible and now you're voting republican?!

I blame Ortiz.

Nicely put

Vote for a guy who wants to shut down your business? That is pretty much the definition of stupidity.

Plus... this coming from the pornstar who created one of the bestworking female-star website? Jenna, I was a fan of yours, but now you loose at least one fan.

 

[Mayhem]

Seriously? Seriously! You guys are just refusing to get it, aren't you? I mean, you're going this far out of your way to be this thick. Man, sometimes I despair for the species.

"I'm very looking forward to a Republican being back in office," Jameson said while sipping champagne in a VIP room at Gold Club in the city's South of Market neighborhood. "When you're rich, you want a Republican in office."

You're not getting the sarcasm in this? Why? Folks, it's called a double entendre. It's sophisticated humor. You actually have to be awake to understand it. This coming from the same woman who said:

"I love the Religious Right. They're some of my best customers."

Hello? Anyone?

OK, I'm done here.

 

[StanScratch]

Re: Romney campaign quietly promised ‘vigorous’ porn crackdown, Reagan prosecutor say

Quit being so delusional. Romney's a Jackass in disguise. None of what you talk about will ever happen. If it does, it will come as "New Regulations" brought about by the Democrats. Haven't you read "When Atlas Shrugged?" Too much Government kills business. Who is John Galt?

If you want to accuse someone of being delusional, You Might not want to go into a little rant that contains quotes from poorly written fiction. Just an FYI.

 

[Pattheprovo]

Jenna is a business woman. She knows, like all business owners, that Romney will protect her business and help it thrive. She knows that the great Obumbler in office will NOT help her business. In fact, the great Obumbler will raise her taxes and create many new taxes (such as Obamacare, and Cap & Trade) that will stifle positive growth. Jenna is a smart woman. Much smarter than any worthless, uneducated, greedy Hollywood idiot actor/actress.

Lolocaust you check his running mate likely a fundie catholic the only idiotic catholics who would vote republican well that's my opinion on my idiotic brethren.....Romney a mormon too...And didn't Bush try to deport Rebecca Linares and have a small go at the porn industry.....If these douches get in they will have a go as well.....Ahh but Jenna has got her money made.