.
I really liked
Kim:
... (Mirror)
Great face, voluptuous body, no tattoos, and into it!
Naturally, I got curious about whether there was more to her than just "Kim." Now that it seems to have become
"every man for himself," I went to those two sites we have been told 80-90% of the new actresses may be found, if only we would get off our butts and look.
You'll notice
The_Shocker wrote of going to the two sites in the prior post, inquiring about
Mitzi:
... (Mirror)
He sounded more confident than me, because whenever I go to those sites, I don't know where to look.
I discovered that
Motley has undergone a major rehaul (as the other site has done recently), and from what I can tell, there is nowhere to look — aside from the sprinkling they offer on their first page.
Sweetmullet had taught us about the "three digit" trick as with, for example,
http://motleymodels.com/listings/display/428. (That used to be the
page for
[NOBABE]Aimee Davis[/NOBABE], thanks to the Sweet one.) This trick had its limitations, because the only way to go through the ladies buried in the site's back pages was to keep changing that three digit number, and go through them one page at a time (not efficient). Well, now we can't do even that!
The other one,
IdealImageModels, isn't very user friendly either; you get a sprinkling of models on the first page, and most are "scrunched together." At least
IdealImageModels has a search function, but that is of limited use, unless you have a name to search for. On the off-chance that the actress who played Kim has a name beginning with Kim, I put in "Kim" in the search box, with no results.
So hopefully, fellow members who have a gift for this sort of thing will be more diligent and report new I.D.'s. This
"every man for himself" slant ain't workin'.
Thank you,
Mentator75, for coming up with the I.D. for the new
Amy, from
[NOBABE]Netgirl,[/NOBABE] co-starring
Sloan. (I was reminded of my
"Stymied Over Amy" post from 2014... the Amy's have been piling up, since.)
.
... (Mirror)
... (Mirror)
