Mayhem
Banned
Christ Almighty, what a doofus. BTW draft-dodger, you have left a question unanswered on the other thread.
One of the prerequisites of security is that you don't let people know what your security methods are. You don't announce your camera angles to the world
Strucural rupturing (as in aluminum supports) are going to make a boom, boom, boom and the harmonic is going to carry throughout the building, sounding like explosions. Pre-set charges are a ridiculous claim. Both airliners were full of jet fuel, which burns much hotter than conventional fuel. The impacts and the initial explosions blew out the exoskeletons of the buildings, on which they got much of their support. There was nothing about the construction of the Twin Towers and the destruction by fully fueled passenger jets that is inconsistent.
The Pentagon had hundreds of security cameras working around the clock. And the ONLY video we have been shown is a some lame explosion? Just one video??? And according to the video, if that single video is the real deal, why do we not see a jetliner smashing into the building?
One of the prerequisites of security is that you don't let people know what your security methods are. You don't announce your camera angles to the world
several firemen are on video saying they heard boom, boom, boom, as the building were coming down.
Strucural rupturing (as in aluminum supports) are going to make a boom, boom, boom and the harmonic is going to carry throughout the building, sounding like explosions. Pre-set charges are a ridiculous claim. Both airliners were full of jet fuel, which burns much hotter than conventional fuel. The impacts and the initial explosions blew out the exoskeletons of the buildings, on which they got much of their support. There was nothing about the construction of the Twin Towers and the destruction by fully fueled passenger jets that is inconsistent.