• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

NOMINATE an OCSM for the March OCSM of the Month contest!!

larss

I'm watching some specialist videos
Well ..... not really. As per the very title of this thread and as per what Petra states at the start of the thread, here's my take on how this thread was supposed to work.

True, there ARE 2 objectives with this Post.
But, only secondarily is the objective to add OCSM candidates to the Best OCSM ballot.
Primarily, it is still the March 2012 OCSM of the Month competition.
By my interpretation of Petra's info, on a first come first served basis, we were free to nominate whichever OCSM we thought was deserving of the March 2012 OCSM of the Month title.
It didn't matter whether she was already on the Best OCSM ballot or not.

Here is where things went off track with this thread.
The idea was to come in here and give the thread a quick scan to see who has already been nominated.
If your Favorite OCSM has already been nominated, then simply nominate your 2nd or 3rd or 4th Favorite depending on how many of your Favorites / deserving OCSMs have already been nominated.
The main idea being to nominate different OCSMs than those obviously already nominated.

If this idea had been followed and everyone nominated an OCSM that hadn't been nominated in this thread yet, the 2nd objective of this thread would have easily gradually have been fulfilled.
Instead, the thread has morphed into a Voting thread when it's only a Nomination thread.
Multiple nominations for the same OCSMs in this thread is not going to expedite or guarantee a Win for any OCSM as the official voting isn't until some other time.
All it takes is ONE nomination and an OCSM will be in the running for the March 2012 OCSM of the Month title AND will be added to the Best OCSM ballot if she isn't in it already.

Anyway, if in this thread we were to only nominate OCSM candidates who weren't in the Best OCSM ballot yet ... we'd be cheating deserving OCSMs out of the March 2012 OCSM of the Month title when they might have seriously done everything to work their Hot Sexy little Butts off to earn that title.

JMO ... my interpretation.

Actually, Chuck, this is sort of voting as the 10 with the most nominations go through to the voting round.
 

ChuckFaze

Closed Account
Actually, Chuck, this is sort of voting as the 10 with the most nominations go through to the voting round.
If that's how they're indeed doing it, it's certainly going to make it tough to fulfill the 2nd objective of this thread ... that of adding more OCSMs to the ballot.

I think when it comes down to it, it was a mistake to have combined the OCSM of the Month competition and the other objective of adding more OCSMs to the ballot.
The way it's being done with the 2 objectives combined, there's like a conflict of interest.
I think everyone's natural, instinctive thinking is that they have that certain absolute Favorite whom they want to win the March 2012 OCSM of the Month title.
So, I think it makes it difficult for anyone to think in terms of, "Hey! Let's introduce way more competition into the mix ... and reduce my Favorite's chances of winning the March title."
And so the multi nominations for the same OCSMs flow of this thread is what ensues.

Another thing I was basing my previous comment on was that last month, I had received a PM asking to help add more OCSMs to the ballot by contributing 3 OCSM nominations.
It was mentioned who was ineligible and who had already been nominated and thus, to please nominate 3 different OCSMs other than those mentioned as ineligible or already nominated. So, with that group in mind, I also scanned the Nomination thread that was going on and made my nomination contribution of "different" OCSMs.

Anyway, oh well, the global economy probably won't be affected by how this plays out.
May a very deserving OCSM win the March title ... and more qualified OCSM candidates be added to the ballot. :thumbsup:
 

Briana Lee

Official Checked Star Member
[B][URL="https://www.freeones.com/jane-burgess said:
Jane Burgess[/URL][/B], post: 6563186, member: 201847"]Thanks. I'm going to do the contest. ")

Yayyyyy!!!!
 
Top