Dumb question, but what's the reason that Nikki still refuses to do real nudity? Is it because there are still people who pay for a 30 year old married mother to "tease" them?

I remember a while back when she said that she wouldn't do nudity because she was "classy." I'm not judging her, but I think most people would admit that sucking a dildo and masturbating on camera isn't what we generally think of when we think of "class." That "classy" ship sailed many moons ago.

We've seen her topless on the Jerry Springer video and I'd say that it's pretty clear that she doesn't have any moral issue with being seen naked, so what exactly is the hold up?

In my opinion, she's still one of the best looking adult models out there and the production value of her videos is usually pretty good (though the picture resolution is shit.) Still, she's gotten beyond boring and stale with the endless "teasing" gimmick. I can't imagine paying to be a member when you know you're not gonna see anything new. There's something masochistic about that.

It comes down to this: Nikki does what she's comfortable doing. Nikki doesn't do what she's not comfortable doing. Nikki does weekly cam shows and has her consistent updates of her own stuff plus the updates of the other models on her site. She clearly has fun doing the site, so she keeps doing it. I'm sure that she'll stop when it ceases to be fun for her. People who are members of her site know what they'll be getting and what they won't be getting - and of course the point of tease is to imply that people will be getting more somehow. There's a lot of sites that are unprofessional in one way or another. It's hard to see that Nikki's site is. It's a well-run site and members get what they paid for. If that's masochistic to you, don't join her site.
 
Top