Any topless nikki in that set phil????
Nikki Sims / Next Door Nikki / Nikki's Playmates
- Thread starter glk35
- Start date
New gallery : happy 4th (07/04/16)
http://www.pinkvelvetvault.com/galleries/nikki/Nikki4th2016/index.php?id=
http://www.pinkvelvetvault.com/galleries/nikki/Nikki4th2016/index.php?id=
HansMoleman
Chief Porn Collector
My goodness, is it the tanning, makeup or Nikki's face look 10 years older!? :O She's just 32, yet looks like 40. Please note that I'm not criticizing Nikki, I'm just asking questions.
She really does in this set, her other recent stuff hasn't been that bad so I assume it's the lighting or makeup like you said. Either way she is 32 now so sometimes I guess that's gonna show, which is why the new Phil stuff has been such a pleasant surprise
I'm not really into milfs, but I will always make an exception for nikki. She is still a solid 10 it's just she was once an impossible standard of hotness. The covering the nips and tease used to be the biggest turn on for me, but after 13 years it has gotten kind of stale. I still believe she's crazy hot but I find myself looking at past videos now more than any new things. I'm not delusional enough to think she will step up to nude probably ever but fuck it would be nice haha. It feels like it's been time for her to take the next step for at least half a decade so it's ridiculous to even hope... oh well.
It's all in the face, her body still looks crazy. She clearly works out a lot, there's not a lot she can do about her face showing her age though... still sexy but clearly getting older
HansMoleman
Chief Porn Collector
You mean like 100% of the people on planet earth, she eventually had to age at some point?
She's kind of in a business where that's a disadvantage if you didn't know???? Especially when content of her much younger self is coming out with some nudity.
She's aging like we all do. Perhaps a little prematurely due to tanning, smoking, etc.. but I think the real reason she looks a little older in the latest set is due to her make-up and the lighting scheme, white balance and exposure. The high key light from the Sun creates hard shadows on every angle of her face, while bleaching out the area around her eyes which have an larger than usual amount of white makeup (perhaps to hide bags under the eyes - could have had a late night or too many drinks the night prior, judging from her uncharacteristic puffiness in this shoot). To compensate for the high key light they've used a reflector on the ground, but all that serves to do is overexpose her (needed to adjust white balance, big time). Depth of field is also a little out of wack, making her nose and chin look more pronounced than usual... I wouldn't make a broad pronouncement about her beauty based on a badly photographed set but obviously she's not growing younger with time. So what...She's still an absolutely bomb-ass chick in my books.
OMG BriX. The way you dissected this set amazes me that you are a customer and not a provider.
I mean everything you said was spot on. And the way you revert back to her being a degenerate mom at the bar just getting hammered every night and she has to use special makeup to conceal that.
Brav-Fucking-O
Seriously, do you work for Met-Art or Playboy or something that you are such an expert?
I mean everything you said was spot on. And the way you revert back to her being a degenerate mom at the bar just getting hammered every night and she has to use special makeup to conceal that.
Brav-Fucking-O
Seriously, do you work for Met-Art or Playboy or something that you are such an expert?
Thanks. But who called her a degenerate mom? I made no such judgment of her character. Everyone's allowed to cut loose once in a while, it's just that most of us don't have to get in front of a 50 megapixel camera the next day. She could have been fighting a cold or flu, or perhaps she has allergies, or maybe it's lupus, or any other possible cause. Alcohol, given that she works part time in the family pub, seemed reasonable.
And no, I don't work for MetArt nor any other provider. I just know how to operate a camera; my dad is a photographer and taught me a bit and I used to work in film production and made my own indy flicks back in the day. It ain't rocket surgery and it's patently obvious from the set that the exposures and white balance are completely fucked - that, or it's a case of Mumblez' "artistic license" gone awry.
I'll say it again: don't be thatguy.