No disrepect to Nikkala or her fans, but i recieved that lodge letter tonight, and seeing her stick insect body writhing in the water is nauseating. Shes not a woman, she has Zero meat on her bones and her breasts, however natural are reduced to looking like bad implants. Im not sure what dress size she is in Uk terms, is that fabled size "0"?
If it is, its quite depressing to see exactly what it is some of the girls I know personally are starving themselves to look like. Far be it for me to discriminate the tastes of others, but to look at her like that just makes me worry for her health. As a friend of mine commented she looks like shes just walked out of auschwitz, there seems to be so little of her that if she sneezed or was bent the wrong way, she'd snap.
I dont mean to rub anyone the wrong way but seeing that made me so angry I had to vent about it. It just seems especially amongst the page 3 circle, more and more of their models are being replaced by these near flast chested contourless bleach blondes seeking WAG status than they are exemplfying the beauty of the female form. Just becase a handful of the greats went on to fame (I do not include Jordan in that lineup by the way), what is wrong with showing diversity in shape and size. Im not implying that michelle mcmanus end up on the 3rd page, but a girl with meat on her can still have curve, shape and sex appeal without pandering to this aesthetic absorbed culture where unless your ribs are out for all to see, no one cares.
Many of you will agree, many will not, but thats opinion for ya, carry on gentlemen.
