Umm...
Marek Malik has 5 points in 42 games this year..his greatest accomplishment in his career is the under-the-leg shootout move he did for the Rangers...he's garbage
Meszaros, 16 points in 52 games...overpaid
Mike Smith was 14-18-11 before he got hurt...decent save % and GA, but he's never played more than 23 games in a season (besides this one) so it's hard to tell if he's going to be consistant
Murphey is decent
I know you're a TB fan, but saying they have no D or proven goaltending is NOT ridiculous
i'm not talking about points scored by them, i'm talking about their help on the blue line (which, since we didn't start out with most of them, explains Smitty's numbers). without them we allow way too many shots on net.
and Smitty has a playing style that blows Luongo out of the water and can play the puck better than him too. once he's healthy (probably next season) it'll be plain as day. Smith > Luongo.
and Smitty has a playing style that blows Luongo out of the water and can play the puck better than him too.
Maybe so, but Luongo has this strange ability to keep the puck out of the net that Smith just doesn't seem to have.
i'm not talking about points scored by them, i'm talking about their help on the blue line (which, since we didn't start out with most of them, explains Smitty's numbers). without them we allow way too many shots on net.
and Smitty has a playing style that blows Luongo out of the water and can play the puck better than him too. once he's healthy (probably next season) it'll be plain as day. Smith > Luongo.
i'm not talking about points scored by them, i'm talking about their help on the blue line (which, since we didn't start out with most of them, explains Smitty's numbers). without them we allow way too many shots on net.
and Smitty has a playing style that blows Luongo out of the water and can play the puck better than him too. once he's healthy (probably next season) it'll be plain as day. Smith > Luongo.
:thumbsup:Smith Is light years in front of Luongo for playing the puck ( Luongo just sucks at it ).Next year people will finally have to learn who Mike Smith is because he will be among the best in the league.
You guys are so blindly biased towards the Lightning it is unbelievable. You can be a fan and still admit the supremacy of other players.
Smith is no where near Luongo. Smith is no where near Toskala. Smith is no where near Vokoun. He is a backup mistaken for a starter. I'd probably even take Osgood over Smith.![]()
Wow you really know how to make a guy laugh his ass off.I agree that Smith is not at Luongo's level yet but comparing him to Toskala and Osgood ? :1orglaugh Vokoun is a very good goalie but Toskala and Osgood ..... to think that you would take these guys before Mike Smith blows my mind.
Wow you really know how to make a guy laugh his ass off.I agree that Smith is not at Luongo's level yet but comparing him to Toskala and Osgood ? :1orglaugh Vokoun is a very good goalie but Toskala and Osgood ..... to think that you would take these guys before Mike Smith blows my mind.
Albeit Osgood hasn't got a good ( 3.18 gga) or (.884 sv.%) this year. he's still got a 24-6-7 record behind an average @ best defense this year. oh yeah and ummm. 3 stanley cup rings, 2 of which he won while safe keeping the goal while the REDWINGS won lord stanley chalice and (Osgood) also has a 3rd CHAMIPIONSHIP RING as a back up to mike veron in 1997.
So yeah maybe Osgood hasn't had a stellar year. But I don't think you can just disregard a 3 time stanley cup champion to that of a goalie who hasn't done anything special yet.:eek:
p.s. BTW, I am not even that big of a fan of Osgood he is too streaky IMO. but he is a proven $ time goalie. :yesyes:
he has a better record than mike smith. with a considerably less talented team too.