Natasha Marley

[legmann61]

However she is very beautiful when she gets fucked.

She is....when the camera actually shows it!!
The models look great, but Bluebird's camera work is AWFUL.
She seems very uncomfortable and awkward most of the time.
What a waste. I really wish she'd go to a better video company with better directors.

 

[Jaxon]

I got her For your eyes only now! The one that she's in the white fishnet stockings. Thinking if I should upload it.

 

[SearchFind]

Anyone knows the name of the next movie of Natasha (B/G) ?

I hope the next will be better.

The positive with For Yours Eyes only, It si Natasha wears always sexy stockings and lingerie or hot dress / skirt.

The area for improvement for Natasha, it's "suck"

Natasha, strongly the next!

 

[Splinter_9]

Pink top black skirt
http://glamourimages.net/baw/only-silk-and-satin-04.html

 

[nmarley]

someone upload the scenes from FYEO plzzz

 

[D-rock]

She seems very uncomfortable and awkward most of the time.

Considering whom she is working with in those scenes I can't say I blame her.

 

[nmarley]

Agreed - her acting is so bad as is the guy, and the porn scenes are soooo amateurish! She can't even give proper head

 

[britush]

Considering whom she is working with in those scenes I can't say I blame her.

His name is Paul Chaplin and he is the OWNER of bluebird. He is just some old rich perv who is converting uk glamour models to shoot for his seedy pleasure, as no one wants to see or get off watching him fucking the girls. i think natasha is the forth glamour model they have converted.

 

[windowsxp02]

http://www.hardglamcash.com/fhg/elegantsmoking/ESup86/

http://www.bevyofbabes.com/tgp/angels-in-uniform/blushing-bride-natasha/indexc.htm

 

[evil_jin]

Her acting is one of the worst I ve ever seen, paul chaplin is also the worst actor ever but seeing natasha doing hardcore movie is just a dream that I never thought it would come true.

Dont think she will ever left bluebirds, she seems to be quite close to chaplin and even if bluebird is the worst porn company, I think they pay her well.
Just hope to see more hardcore from her soon and maybe an anal scene ^^

 

[Johnson007]

Her acting is one of the worst I ve ever seen, paul chaplin is also the worst actor ever but seeing natasha doing hardcore movie is just a dream that I never thought it would come true.

Dont think she will ever left bluebirds, she seems to be quite close to chaplin and even if bluebird is the worst porn company, I think they pay her well.
Just hope to see more hardcore from her soon and maybe an anal scene ^^

Yes I agree, but if want to see a great acting role, then I'll tuine in to Helen Mirren or Meryl Streep :eeew:

 

[D-rock]

Yes I agree, but if want to see a great acting role, then I'll tuine in to Helen Mirren or Meryl Streep :eeew:

The acting in porn doesn't need to be a masterpiece, but it also can't be something that turns people off either. It's supposed to be something that sets the mood and is erotic, stimulating, and sensual.



I'm well aware of who Chaplin is. I actually tried to give the guy a chance and was objective. I really did, but the problem is he seems like one of those people that just doesn't get it that he isn't good, doesn't belong in his own movies, doesn't look like he belongs with the women he performs with, and he seems like the type of person that can get to be very easy to dislike, which he also seems not to realize or care about. (I'm almost starting to pray the upcoming Bluebird movies with Gemma don't have them working together.)

He just needs to quit his ego trips and actually hire people that know what the hell they are doing before his company goes under. As it is now the whole operation seems like it's run by a bunch of well funded amateurs. As bad as some people are complaining about the movies they might actually be the best part of the whole Bluebird operation.

 

[legmann61]

The acting in porn doesn't need to be a masterpiece, but it also can't be something that turns people off either. It's supposed to be something that sets the mood and is erotic, stimulating, and sensual.

Exactly, D-Rock.
There's many ways to shoot porn: gonzo, sensual, POV, sexy, etc, etc.
Bluebird does virtually none of these! Terrible production value!

There's a scene where Natasha is bouncing up and down cowgirl and
you basically see her arm and the side of her tummy - but no penetration.
There are similar scenes in both movies that are shot just as bad.
And, please, take the camera off the dude's disgusting hairy stomach!

As I've said, if she looks mostly uncomfortable (which she does),
for it's a huge turn-off for me. IMHO, Natasha is being wasted here.
I really do wish she was working for one of the better American studios.

 

[SearchFind]

Natasha Marley makes latex pics and videos :
http://www.latexclusive.com/updates/natasha
http://latexotica.com/updates/natasha

 

[Fairchild]

Natasha Marley makes latex pics and videos :
http://www.latexclusive.com/updates/natasha
http://latexotica.com/updates/natasha

"Restricted".

 

[Fairchild]

And, please, take the camera off the dude's disgusting hairy stomach!

This for sure!

And also, is the zoom button on your camera stuck? Zoom the hell OUT!! I'm pretty sure the girl has a face, show it!

 

[evil_jin]

Any news about her upcoming hardcore ??

 

[dibiza]

http://www.bluebirdreleases.com/2011/january/for_your_eyes_only.php

 

[windowsxp02]

http://www.hardglamcash.com/fhg/elegantsmoking/ESup86/

 

[evil_jin]

http://www.bluebirdreleases.com/2011/january/for_your_eyes_only.php

It has already been released , I have all scenes