Most degrading porn?

Any time a woman has to fuck Nick Manning it's degrading.
 
to ask back - is it a sign of respect to plug your cock in a girl's mouth / vagina / ... ?

to me, sexual desire isn't a question of respect. it's a question of desire and fantasy and to be near as near and intimate i am allowed to go with my partner. and a question of respect is, that i share those desires with a girl, who likes it the same way. and it's a question of respect, that if she didn't like a "unusual" desire, i won't do it with her. there is no "must" for it.

I agree with you. As long as there are two consenting adults satisfying each others desires and fantasies, nothing can really be degrading. But the original question of the thread was about porn. There may be consent among the people making porn, but they are not doing it out of desire for their partner or to satisfy their partners or their own fantasies. They are in most cases only doing it for money.
 
But the original question of the thread was about porn. There may be consent among the people making porn, but they are not doing it out of desire for their partner or to satisfy their partners or their own fantasies. They are in most cases only doing it for money.
so, under the line, we can't tell it at all unless we didn't know what the performer of porn feels/thinks about it ;)
 
Porn involving 'fake' or forced rape is very disturbing. Spitting, choking, slapping and puking is a big turn off and not erotic. That asshole Max Hardcore immediately comes to mind. I've seen a few Japanese bukkake scenes and I'm like WTF? Not my cup of tea. Unfortunately, I think the most extreme and degrading porn I've seen has to be from Germany. Scat, bestiality, fisting, quadruple vaginal & anal insertions are the norm with these guys.
 
It is always wise to look ahead, but difficult to look further than you can see.
(w. churchill)
 
I let someone pee on me once. I don't see the big deal about it, as long as it doesn't get in my mouth or vag. We did it in the shower, so when he was done I just turned on the water and cleaned myself off.

I think I love you.


Any time a woman has to fuck Nick Manning it's degrading.

Oh c'mon Nick Manning is great. He's funny. Usually chicks who fuck him know what they're getting.


Look, I see people throwing in the money situation here and there to try to validate the cause of degrading porn. That is the wrong to look at it. They're all in it for the money. Heck, then ALL PORN in general would be degrading. Money alone is the motivator for this entire industry. I can assure anyone that those girls doing fisting scenes, golden showers, etc. aren't performing those scenes for free.
 
Sputnik! Looks like you've got another suitor!
 
meatholes.com is about the most degrading. They fuck them apallingly hard, spit on them, slap them, stand on their faces.
The most degrading part is the guy spends about 20 minutes talking to them first, finding out their history and how to push their buttons. he really psychologically breaks them down and you can see its not fake. he then uses that info to degrade them in teh horrendous fuck session. They often cry or lose it or spit back at him.
Its great.
 
I don't see where any porn is degrading to the ones performing it. They agreed to do it so how can it be degrading? If someone was gang banged like on a street corner for all the neighbors to come out and watch without consenting to it then that would be degrading. Regular porno whatever type it is should not be considered degrading. Even scat porn is not degrading to the one performing since they knew what they were in for and prob would not do it if they didn't enjoy it to start with. To me the nastier and more unusual it is the better and more arousing. Mila the queen of nasty and super hot once had her prolapsed asshole sucked on hard and licked clean with it full of cum hanging clean out of her butt. I had quite a response to that.
 
What might not be seen as degrading because the "girl gets paid for it" would be incredibly degrading and downright sick if a pornography viewer attempted to recreate similar scenes with normal, everyday women.

So just because the woman is a pornstar and gets a cheque at the end of the day doesn't mean that the acts performed aren't degrading to women everywhere. The only difference is is that the pornstar is WILLING to be degraded. Rape, pissing, shitting, abuse and the like is degredation in every sense of the word...just in porn, its paid degredation.
 

ChefChiTown

The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
What might not be seen as degrading because the "girl gets paid for it" would be incredibly degrading and downright sick if a pornography viewer attempted to recreate similar scenes with normal, everyday women.

So just because the woman is a pornstar and gets a cheque at the end of the day doesn't mean that the acts performed aren't degrading to women everywhere. The only difference is is that the pornstar is WILLING to be degraded. Rape, pissing, shitting, abuse and the like is degredation in every sense of the word...just in porn, its paid degredation.

That's very true. Having a stranger shit on your chest while some random transexual gags you with a sock and ass fucks you with a floppy, rubber dildo that's shaped like Jesus is degrading if whether you're getting paid for it or not.

I've never understood how obviously degrading things are being done to some of these women in porn (and men too), yet, they try and justify it, like it's completely normal behavior, just because it's "part of their job". Umm, you're getting paid to fuck a stranger...how is that not degrading? :dunno:
 
Its all a matter of perception.

If I came here and announced that my best friend got chained to a bathtub, while being pissed on by one guy, throat fucked by another and had a fist up the ass, everyone here would be appalled. But if I THEN mentioned that she was doing it in a porno, everyone would be like "oh, well thats fine then". It seems that alot of people just deem certain acts fine for some human beings, but not others...whether the participants are "willing" or not. If I was willing to be raped on camera...doesn't make the act non degrading. Just means I for some reason am fine for allowing it to happen, and allowing it to be "normal" to the men watching...which is kind of sad. And makes me ask the question to those men who get aroused by the kind of "rape, poo, vomit, throat fucking" porn....if you were walking down the street and saw a man forcing a woman to endure those kind of things...would you be pained, or would you be tempted to whip out your dick and rub one out?

Just curious. Not trying to offend, just trying to understand how that kind of stuff can be seen as "normal" , not degrading and even arousing.
 

NOB_16

Banned
What might not be seen as degrading because the "girl gets paid for it" would be incredibly degrading and downright sick if a pornography viewer attempted to recreate similar scenes with normal, everyday women.

So just because the woman is a pornstar and gets a cheque at the end of the day doesn't mean that the acts performed aren't degrading to women everywhere. The only difference is is that the pornstar is WILLING to be degraded. Rape, pissing, shitting, abuse and the like is degredation in every sense of the word...just in porn, its paid degredation.

yer you might get paid to do that what if she didnt it is still degrading and gross
 
Top