Some of them might be down to do the gig if presented with the opportunity in a way they could be sure it was something legitimate. Since proving I am legit and really who I say I am on a camsite is nearly impossible... its not really worth the effort. Not to my surprise, anytime I have attempted, the model either didn't give me the time of day or pretended to be interested then never followed through. I can only hope that customers suggest MomPov to them for me and that they come to me to do a shoot.
- - - Updated - - -
Some of them might be down to do the gig if presented with the opportunity in a way they could be sure it was something legitimate. Since proving I am legit and really who I say I am on a camsite is nearly impossible... its not really worth the effort. Not to my surprise, anytime I have attempted, the model either didn't give me the time of day or pretended to be interested then never followed through. I can only hope that customers suggest MomPov to them for me and that they come to me to do a shoot.
James, There seems to be a huge difference, a difference between night and day between the Male Talent pool and female talent pool on Mompov VS. Girlsdoporn. You really blow the male talent of GDP out of the water, with everything, including the facials/cumshots-heck you might even top Peter North on that
The guy that fucked Miss Teen Delaware on GDP comes closest to you as far as talent level but no where near your league. As far, as the girls go, I think GDP is light years ahead of mompov in their talent and recruitment of women. Therefore, I ask you these 2 questions that only you can probably answer: Question #1. With GDP being such a good site with gorgeous girl next door type girls, how come they cannot find good male talent to fuck for them, at least someone that can do 50-75% of your performance on camera? Question #2. On the flip side, not that your women on MOMPOV are garbage, but how come your recruiting and female talent are not even close to GDP's? I would think you use the same methods for recruiting, pay the same, etc? So why such big discrepancies regarding both male and female talent on each sites?