********** said:
and as for giving him "credit" for Russia's fall, OMG please. Gorbachev, anyone?
Actually, it was the various Soviet Republicans, including Yeltzin, far more than the federal Soviet. But one could make the argument it was that the Soviet could not "outspend" the US, and that led to the Soviet Republicans finally "having enough."
********** said:
Reagan was probably miserable that America would have to seek a new enemy. And oh, how they did.
Nothing has changed in American policy. The difference is that the world no longer tolerates "American policy" now that the USSR is gone. No body likes two bullies, but typically most will get behind one. But everyone hates one bully.
Again, American policy hasn't changed -- Clinton was proof of that (most people here are young, and don't remember all the flak Clinton's actions got too). But there is no more USSR, so most people don't think the US should continue on with its "business as usual" of resource usage, national interests, etc...
That, more than anything, is the entire reason.