member006
Closed Account
In light of the Woodstock thread and all the Paul McCartney hoopla. I figured I'd bring this here too.
Everyone is still stirring the pot. Lets be serious, they are just now considering this as a possibility? While I can see the interest and the possibility. Have they not looked at the big picture? I mean to say after all many people resided at those 'communes' in those days. Some permanent residents and some coming and going in a swinging door type fashion. Many ***** were used too. I think they are looking for needles in a haystack myself. I am sure people died of natural causes (illnesses), **** overdoses and various other reasons. Who's to say these graves hold ****** victims? I would assume deaths of any kind weren't reported to local authorities by them and those people that did die were buried right on the property. He and his followers I would think wanted to keep a low profile in the area pre-Tate, it would make more sense to me.
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/03/14/csi.manson.ap/?iref=hpmostpop
LL
Everyone is still stirring the pot. Lets be serious, they are just now considering this as a possibility? While I can see the interest and the possibility. Have they not looked at the big picture? I mean to say after all many people resided at those 'communes' in those days. Some permanent residents and some coming and going in a swinging door type fashion. Many ***** were used too. I think they are looking for needles in a haystack myself. I am sure people died of natural causes (illnesses), **** overdoses and various other reasons. Who's to say these graves hold ****** victims? I would assume deaths of any kind weren't reported to local authorities by them and those people that did die were buried right on the property. He and his followers I would think wanted to keep a low profile in the area pre-Tate, it would make more sense to me.
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/03/14/csi.manson.ap/?iref=hpmostpop
LL