I'd venture to say...surviving 2 atomic blasts would be considered lucky anywhere!
And there's only been 2...
...over a populated area.
There have been over 2000 nuclear tests.
I'd venture to say...surviving 2 atomic blasts would be considered lucky anywhere!
And there's only been 2...
I'd venture to say...surviving 2 atomic blasts would be considered lucky anywhere!
And there's only been 2...
The ironic thing? This guy will probably die from choking on some food or something really unmanly.
You deserve some kind of award for the most unnecessary post this month....over a populated area.
There have been over 2000 nuclear tests.
That's interesting that he is the only one recognized as having survived both blasts.
Years ago, when I was in junior high, I remember reading a book called Nine Who Survived: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I guess there was no way to verify that they actually experienced both.
they were 3 days apart.
You deserve some kind of award for the most unnecessary post this month.
Winner : Artimus...UPOTM !
I'm a little bit surprised that, out of all eyewitness accounts and (auto)biographical novels, you read this book in school. There are far better and far more neutral and objective ones.
No, not at all. Let me give you a (very) short explanation. That books belongs to a genre called "genbaku-bungaku" or "atomic (bomb) literature". In that genre there are again different classifications. There are at least two different systems by different scientists/scholars (history, literature, political science, sociology, psychology, physics,...) who can be seriously considered, but they all are of the opinion, that the genre is to be divided/subdivided.Are you saying that particular book was all lies?
Trumbull was a really good "war and conflicts reporter", who was able to show a certain level of empathie for the people (for example the Japanese, even after he got shot at at Iwo Jima) and wasn't only about the gory details and the glorification of war and the American military.I don't recall any other books back then (it was around 1973 when I read it).
But a more neutral (and especially more "first hand") account like that of John Hersey (titled "Hiroshima", the first account of the bombings published in the US) would probably have been more suited for a school, as in school you should learn to develop your own thoughts on a subject like that.
Actually my reading that book had nothing to do with the school curriculum. I found it at the local public library and read it because I wanted to read it. I just mentioned my being in school as a point of reference in time.