Lucy Pinder Nipples?
- Thread starter Lazarus
- Start date
Slumpy said:
If your saying Lucy topless on that boat, look again, on every picture Lucy's in she has a bikini top on. Now you might be confussing Lucy with Jerri Byrne or Sophie Howard, as they are both topless. This by the way was the Daily Star calendar shoot location last year.
If not like I said, I posted the pictures to show you every way Lucy has posed to date and thats the only reason I posted them.
i didnt see any lucy nips here
If she ever will...
As I explained.
There isn't any full frontal nipple shots so to speak. But there are many see-through tops and the odd side nipple or the very odd wardrobe malfunction.
That I can just about certainly say is a never.
I don't know how to put this and not offend any OCSM's or such. So I'll just say it and hope it doesn't. If it does all I can say is sorry and no offence meant or not been personal against you.
Lucy has a set level of standards or morals. She doesn't think posing nude is for her. Or that it would be good for her career. After all she has said more than once. She would like to work in TV, films or something like when her modeling career is over.
On a personal note I won't want her too, as I don't think it is her in her real persona.
For god's sake, take off your freaking top already! The freaking Next Door Nikki of England! Oh, you know you want her to poggy 
Bus a cat man!
Not only might it not be something she wants to do, but also I can see it in some ways as almost being a trademark of hers now. That might be another reason why she doesn’t do it, because she is well known for not taking it off. It's part of her style she in known by. It just wouldn't be the same it she started showing everything.
...or maybe she just enjoys driving men to insanity by having them keep waiting. :1orglaugh
...or maybe she just enjoys driving men to insanity by having them keep waiting. :1orglaugh
Re: Lucy Pinder Nipples? & her morals
Is it not of a bit of a piss take for her to go on about morals when she is a glamour model
Don't get me wrong but she does everything apart from show her nips, she does shots just in her knickers holding her tits, with other girls < kinda glam kissing lezbians - or that's what you're suposed to think > and to top it off the pics are either on page3 or in nuts & fhm
I don't know how she can say much about morals when her job involves providing wank material for teenage boys - whether she gets 'em out or not
On that basis - how moral is it posing for lads mags ? If she is so cocerned about being a good moral girl she should change career entirely
- now, whether she shows or not, she is earning a living providing titilation to (mostly) men
<which i like>
Is it not of a bit of a piss take for her to go on about morals when she is a glamour model
Don't get me wrong but she does everything apart from show her nips, she does shots just in her knickers holding her tits, with other girls < kinda glam kissing lezbians - or that's what you're suposed to think > and to top it off the pics are either on page3 or in nuts & fhm
I don't know how she can say much about morals when her job involves providing wank material for teenage boys - whether she gets 'em out or not
On that basis - how moral is it posing for lads mags ? If she is so cocerned about being a good moral girl she should change career entirely
- now, whether she shows or not, she is earning a living providing titilation to (mostly) men
<which i like>
Re: Lucy Pinder Nipples? & her morals
She didn't talk about morals, I did
She only appeared once in FHM. She's been in Loaded, Front, Nuts and Maxim quite a few times. In fact she even has her own weekly help page in Nuts. She also used to appear in Zoo which is owned by FHM until they printed quite a few lies about her and Michelle Marsh. Now their management agency don't even deal with them. Never mind have their models shoot for them. So this is why only one appearance in FHM.
Is it not of a bit of a piss take for her to go on about morals when she is a glamour model
Don't get me wrong but she does everything apart from show her nips, she does shots just in her knickers holding her tits, with other girls < kinda glam kissing lezbians - or that's what you're suposed to think > and to top it off the pics are either on page3 or in nuts & fhm
I don't know how she can say much about morals when her job involves providing wank material for teenage boys - whether she gets 'em out or not
On that basis - how moral is it posing for lads mags ? If she is so cocerned about being a good moral girl she should change career entirely
- now, whether she shows or not, she is earning a living providing titilation to (mostly) men
<which i like>
She didn't talk about morals, I did
She only appeared once in FHM. She's been in Loaded, Front, Nuts and Maxim quite a few times. In fact she even has her own weekly help page in Nuts. She also used to appear in Zoo which is owned by FHM until they printed quite a few lies about her and Michelle Marsh. Now their management agency don't even deal with them. Never mind have their models shoot for them. So this is why only one appearance in FHM.
Ok poggy - i accept it was you talking about her having morals - i was assuming that you must've read something like she thought her morals prevented her posing nude & it would be bad for her career - is that not what you meant ?
I know i mentioned FHM but i was just using that as a example lad mag title- to be honest i'm not that up to speed on the current range of mags, i stopped buying FHM, loaded etc years ago
Anyway - my point was it seems to be farcical to go on about your "morals" when you're a glamour model like she is - i don't think there is much "moral" difference between a pic of a woman in bikini bottoms holding 2 fingers over each nip or the same woman standing with her arms by her side exposing her breasts
- both are "sexualised" photos
at the end of the day she gets paid to provide material for male excitement, titilation, masturbation etc
( she's not a catwalk or a nude artist's model after all )
:2 cents:
