Atar554 said:
no ass? or is that included in the legs category?
Legzman said:
could be considered included I assume
That's what I assumed.
I don't know about how others view the breast, but the breast is more than just the standing or hanging mammary sags themselves. The width of the torso and connecting curves above and below have much to say in the appearance of the breast. I mean, when I'm feeling up the sides of a woman's stomach, I like it to be an inward hourglass -- I run my hands up and up, then start to move out just slightly, then a pair of hanging breasts drape over them and are sticking out the sides.
Same deal with legs, the legs include the thighs up through the pelvis, hips through the curve of the rear. I can't have long legs without full thighs that don't merely terminate into her hips, but then start to curve back inward before her stomach. I need to have a place to grab my hands and pull her hips back down onto my member when I'm having vaginal intercourse. That's not "love handles" (which are completely diffferent and too soft/flabby for using!), that's God Herself giving you a solid, bone-supported "pull handle" so you can motion her onto your manhood!
In fact, that's why I can't distinguish between liking the breasts or legs more! Because they join into one perfect curve -- or imperfect one. I've seen many men talk about how hot a woman's breasts or legs were, only to have a seriously disjoined figure and curve overall. The hourglass figure is where it is at -- the stomach curves in and away from the chest, regardless of how much the breasts hang over it (and out the sides) and then back out as they come into the hips and thighs below.
Probably the most idea is the woman who not only has a perfect hourglass from the front or rear, but looks even better from the sides -- jutting bust in one direction, protruding rear in the other.
So my visual (as well as physical) pleasure is intertwined between how the body is connected from bust to legs. I don't know if its visual programming or the fact that I never stop caressing every portion of a woman's body regardless of where my "manhood" is at or what its doing at the time, but I can't stand to have one without the other. Maybe that's why I can't stop cupping breasts, grabbing hips and lifting thighs when I have missionary intercourse, or I prefer the reverse mammary intercourse (tit-fuck) when I'm looking down at my lover's crotch and legs.
I know I'm not the only one who feels like this, but one of the fewer men who can explain exactly why I do. There's a reason why Angelina Jolie and Scarlett Johanssen are very popular -- they are virtually the only mainstream actresses with a hint of a hourglass figure (and not even up to common model standards). Yet they are lambasted as "fat" or "larger girls" which makes me laugh -- not only at that statement, but at the fact that the media is creating its own problem and denying themselves more viewership as a result!
All I know is that the desire to have a woman with one, perfect, joining curve between bust to legs is only getting worse the more years I live and practice becoming one with my wife's curves. Maybe I was able to tit-fuck a pure apple shape or orally please a complete pear shape before I started having vaginal intercourse -- but I'm really getting more picky on this as I get older.
