Protesting is a right, so the police can just stay out of it.
Premium Link Upgrade
Remember the police pulled a man from his car and beaten, for flashing the middle finger at ******* immigrants at a immigrant march?
How's that justified?
Also, last night on the History Channel, the "non-violent" "anti-racism" protestors were the ones who attacked a Separatist/ Klan member.
I guess the protestors were against Freedom of Speech as long as it wasn't their freedom of speech that was at stake. :tongue:
The 2 videos really aren't comparable from my view. And your point is....?
But then I am not a great constitutional scholar like Will E.
At least you finally admit it.
It depends, was the Boston Tea Party "peaceful?"
It was necessary. :hatsoff:
Was the BILL OF RIGHTS ratified then?
No point, I just wanted to show both videos, and the fact that I was stuck in traffic at the 'peaceful' Pittsburgh G20 protest on Liberty Ave.
Boston Tea party, 1773
Bill of Rights Dec 15th, 1791
Yes....as was every other amendment to the constitution.
Seeing that I work in Shadyside, where the protesters started, and only way out is Liberty Ave. And about halfway down liberty ave is when all the **** started, a good 5 miles from downtown pittsburgh, and you can be in downtown only if you WORKED there like I stated before or were part of the G20.Weren't you told to stay out of downtown? :1orglaugh
OK, I'll bite. What is the significance of these factoids?
I said "peacefully" assemble and will said was the boston tea party peaceful, well since the constitution was not ratified it is not goverened by it.
WTF. Here's a video of men in military uniforms arresting a protester at the G20 meeting in Pittsburgh. They are not civilian cops but some type of military police. I hope this is a fake but I don't think so.
Premium Link Upgrade
Whenever the libs protest or demonstrate, it's called organizing of the community kind.
Whenever the conservas, or other various groups that happen to disagree with the fabian socialist viewpoint of the day, happen to protest, they're often referred to as a gaggle of racist - white supremacists who disagree with the President for no other reason than some cooked up imperative that they have to oppose a black man.![]()
Huffington, Maddow & "the nation"
:glugglug: