i like kubrick but they're very different directors...i think kubrick vs stone would be a more appropriate
Kubrick because not only was a very crafty artistic director, but he was absolutely nuts. On the set of The Shining he made Shelly Duval cry at one point during film or was it Scatman Curruthers? Anyway not knocking Scorses but Kubrick wasn't always focused on one type of film.
Cape Fear. His last great movie. All other stuff is overrated.
I've always wondered how he got the name "Scatman".
Nope,I love it.Am I the only one who liked Gangs of New York? It's starting to feel that way
Even though I did like it,what would you call Eyes Wide Shut?Paths Of Glory > everything Scorsese has ever made.
It's Kubrick by a country mile. He never made even so much as an average film. All his films were good to great. Scorsese has made at least a couple of absolute piles of shit, whilst Kubrick was far more adaptable in the types of stories he shot.
Sorry,but it is terribly outdated now.I just watched Platoon for the first time recently,and just the style of filmmaking felt 80's.Ask Scorsese and he will tell you it's Kubrick.
"We are all children of Cecil B Demill and Stanley Kubrick." Scorsese said in interview and that is one guy who knows his film stuff.
Personally I think they are both fantastic but for me Kubrick is the man. If you watch Full Metal Jacket now you can't see the year it was made. Do the same with say Oliver Stone's Platoon and you can tell right away it's an 80's film. Just one example of Kubricks craft meaning his work never dates.
On the other hand Scorsese is the last real auteur in American films. You have to hand it to the man.
Even though I did like it,what would you call Eyes Wide Shut?
I've always wondered how he got the name "Scatman".