Kids of Pornstars

i can´t understand why is more accepted by some societies of this world (mainly USA) violence than sex...

So a gangster from mafia can have a big family..nobody discuss how good father he can be but..a pornstar is a bad father or mother...ridiculous...
 
Theres a difference, getting nutted on your face then going home and kissing your kids is just wrong.

Sex is an act that makes children you shouldnt disrespect your kids and suck dick for a living.
 
How do you disrespect your kids by sucking dicks?

BTW the last post was made almost 2 years ago, I doubt many of the people that posted in this thread are still around these days.
 
what do you think about that? would you have children if you would work in the business?

I think that there are several issues with this : once you're on film, it cannot be retracted.

So before committing to a career in the industry, a person should think long and hard about whether they feel comfortable with the thought that what they do can/will be seen by their inlaws, children, neighbours.

Personally I do not believe that a career as a pron star is a good example to any child.
 
I believe pornstars are quite comfortable showing their bodies to other people and even though family might be an exception to this in some cases, I doubt it is very often. If they weren't, they probably wouldn't show their bodies to cameramen, soundmen, directors an co-stars in the first place and they certainly wouldn't do it if they thought about the fact that millions of men (& women) would see it.

Now about comments like this one

Theres a difference, getting nutted on your face then going home and kissing your kids is just wrong.

Sex is an act that makes children you shouldnt disrespect your kids and suck dick for a living.

and (partly, as you clearly state that it's your opinion, (probably) based on your own morals and you have every right to your own opinion) this one,

Personally I do not believe that a career as a pron star is a good example to any child.

When I read comments like this, I often get the feeling that the people posting them think that sex outside of a relationship is wrong. Why else would you consider it a bad example or disrespectful towards your children?

Sadly, a lot of those people (luckily not all of them & I don't know which of the 2 groups you belong to) cheat on their wives (or in the case of women, husbands, unless you're gay, in which case it would be... well, you get my point), they have sex outside of a relationship, just like pornstars & prostitutes (something they obviously consider to be wrong, which I don't), but they lie to their partners as well (something I consider to be wrong).

I personally have no trouble with men/women who have sex just because they enjoy it (ouside of a relationship), as long as they're honest about it and as long as the partners, if they have one, agree with it.

I do have a problem with people lying to the people that care about them. I find it disrespectful towards that person and towards the person they're cheating with (they often lie to that person as well). If they have kids they often lie to them as well (if you won't tell your gf/wife that you're fucking someone else you won't tell your kids either).
They often leave those kid(s) waiting for it's/their dad (cause they probably love daddy) while he's spending a lot of his time totally ignoring his kid(s) and fucking someone who probably doesn't even know he has kids...

If a mother or father tells it's kids that they do certain things they physically enjoy but that he/she'd be home at night to take care of the kids then I have no problems with it at all.

The conclusion is that I don't see a problem with a pornstar having a kid, but I do have a problem with cheaters who have kids.
 
When I read comments like this, I often get the feeling that the people posting them think that sex outside of a relationship is wrong. Why else would you consider it a bad example or disrespectful towards your children?

Sadly, a lot of those people (luckily not all of them & I don't know which of the 2 groups you belong to) cheat on their wives (or in the case of women, husbands, unless you're gay, in which case it would be... well, you get my point), they have sex outside of a relationship, just like pornstars & prostitutes (something they obviously consider to be wrong, which I don't), but they lie to their partners as well (something I consider to be wrong).

First of all, who gives YOU the right to judge me?
I don't consider any pornstar as being a good example to kids. Period.

Whether sex is within or outside a relationship is immaterial - pornography is an artificial portrayal of sex.
And for kids to be exposed to this artificiality is not right - in my view.


I personally have no trouble with men/women who have sex just because they enjoy it (ouside of a relationship), as long as they're honest about it and as long as the partners, if they have one, agree with it.

If both adults consent to this - then that is their decision.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
I don't consider any pornstar as being a good example to kids. Period.

I agree.

Whether sex is within or outside a relationship is immaterial - pornography is an artificial portrayal of sex.
And for kids to be exposed to this artificiality is not right - in my view.

Most people are not on camera and they have artificial sex too.
Just because they aren't on camera having sex doesn't make them better.
Also, I don't believe in sex without love or before marriage.

:hatsoff:
 
First of all, who gives YOU the right to judge me?
I don't consider any pornstar as being a good example to kids. Period.

I never tried to judge you, merely opening a discussion. The only time I used the word you it wasn't specifically aimed at you (in this case it is you) but at every reader who shares your & hla24's opinion. The reason I didn't quote more was because earlier posts are more than 2 years old & IMHO no longer relevant for this discussion, as the posters are (in many cases) no longer around and a discussion is thus no longer possible.

If I have offended you in any way, I apologise.

And for kids to be exposed to this artificiality is not right - in my view.


I wouldn't expose small children to porn either and I'm not saying porn should be broadcast at 10 am on sunday morning when the kids are watching their favorite cartoons, but I do believe that when a child reaches a certain age and can be expected to look for porn all by him/herself or becomes interested in the opposite sex the former star should be honest about it.

I do have to say I have more problems with relatively small children exposed to violence (think of the transformers, he-man, the X-men, dragonball, etc.) than porn, but I still wouldn't show porn to small children simply because they'd probably find it uninteresting and because kids have a tendency to repeat what they see. The last reason is a problem because small children have trouble understanding the concept of consent.

Except in the cases of some milfs, most pornstars have quit by the time the kid goes to kindergarten (you'll probably agree with me that the career of a pornstar is a relatively short one) so the chances the child will be confronted with it are relatively small as most people don't look for 10-18 yr old porn and the only problem that I see is that they might be teased at school.

If you keep in mind that the chances of a small kid being exposed to porn are relatively small and if you keep in mind that the topic was about pornstars being able to be good parents and not if small children should be exposed to porn, then I can only repeat that yes, pornstars can be good parents, better than people who lie to their children or pay too little attention to their children (although a pornstar could do that as well, but that has little to do with the profession and more with the character of the individual). ;)
 

Jane Burgess

Official Checked Star Member
First of all, who gives YOU the right to judge me?
I don't consider any pornstar as being a good example to kids. Period.

Whether sex is within or outside a relationship is immaterial - pornography is an artificial portrayal of sex.
And for kids to be exposed to this artificiality is not right - in my view.




If both adults consent to this - then that is their decision.



I will judge you. You are judging the people that work in porn. What gives you the right to do that? Peoplel that work in porn are a better example for kids than many other people are.

Have you watched Dateline NBC? Who do you see showing up to meet kids? Teachers, doctors, scientists, rabbi's, lawyers, counselors, etc. Not once in any of those shows was there one person that worked in porn. Porn is a job period.It is also not good to expose kids to narrow minded people.
 
I find it frankly highly hypocritcal of people to come here and enjoy themselves and then go quipping "Porn is bad porn is not good"

Frankly no pornstar would expose his/her children to porn when they are juvenile.After they get older its their choice.
At the end of the day, I personally view it as a profession and the pornstars as professionals whose priority is to entertain people---the same way a comic makes us laugh or an actor scares us in horror movies.
Making porn doesnt make a person bad.
Its just his/her profession.
And I am pretty sure they keep their kids away from it when they are kids.

Coming back to topic--I dont know how the topic changed from the main subject to this debate.....

As for parents and their kin in porn.
Wasn't the legendary Tiny Tove's mother a pornstar too and Sunrise Adams was brought to porn by her Aunt(when she became an adult)
 
Chances are, children have a higher chances of being exposed to pornography due to their non-pornstar parents or father leaving it lying around the house than an actual pornstar exposing their children to their job. I'm pretty sure pornstars who have children keep their work life and their home life very very separate. If you think children should be protected from this industry, then I hope that you won't be hypocritical and watch porn online/rent dvds/buy magazines when you have children yourself.

Just because a mom happens to take cum to the face during her 9-5, doesn't mean its going to affect her ability to pick her kids up from school, take them to soccer practice and raise them in a healthy way. Its not like pornstars will have dildos lying all over their house when theres kids around :rolleyes:

I cam, and I plan on camming after I have children too (if my body doesn't get too fat and stretch-marked lol)...I can't wait to have a family and I know I'm going to be a great mother. What I do to provide for my family has nothing to do with that!
 
I'd rather have a mom that did porn than crack....

I'm pretty sure Diddy (diddylicious.com) has kids = teen and milf at the same time :thumbsup:
 
I will judge you. You are judging the people that work in porn. What gives you the right to do that? Peoplel that work in porn are a better example for kids than many other people are.

You need to re-read my posts.

I haven't judged people in the porn business.
I have judged people in the porn business who have children and the fact that those children will be exposed to their parents behaviour in that particular business.

I do not think that it is appropriate for any child to be exposed to images of their parents working in the porn business.

And the correct spelling is people, not peoplel.



Have you watched Dateline NBC? Who do you see showing up to meet kids? Teachers, doctors, scientists, rabbi's, lawyers, counselors, etc. Not once in any of those shows was there one person that worked in porn. Porn is a job period.It is also not good to expose kids to narrow minded people.

Don't watch dateline or any other US television shows.

And as far as my being narrowminded - if insisting that it is not right for kids to be exposed to their parents activities in the porn industry is deemed narrowminded - then I'm more than happy to be considered narrowminded.
 
Top