Katya Clover - AKA: Caramel, Caramel S, Clove, Clover, Clover Q, CloverQ, Eavalla, Eketerina Skaredina, Katharine, Katya, Katyaclover, Mango A

Attachments

  • CL6zxqNWUAE4vc0.jpg
    CL6zxqNWUAE4vc0.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 4,437
^ Still dosnt show any penetration. so im guessing its one more of those 3/4-way scenes where only 1 girl gets fucked or its a dull handjob scene. Pass in either case. Wowgirls are usually very misleading in their promotional ways. Why not just show a pic of her fucking if there acutally is some action. So im guessing what jayrock said was true, she did no b/g. (And no, watching in a threeway or handjobs are not b/g.)
 
^ Still dosnt show any penetration. so im guessing its one more of those 3/4-way scenes where only 1 girl gets fucked or its a dull handjob scene. Pass in either case. Wowgirls are usually very misleading in their promotional ways. Why not just show a pic of her fucking if there acutally is some action. So im guessing what jayrock said was true, she did no b/g. (And no, watching in a threeway or handjobs are not b/g.)

Fair enough if you are interested in seeing hardcore boy-girl penetration and nothing else. I don't think there have been any claims by the producers of intercourse.

I can still be a fan of Katya Clover and respect the models limitations on what she will and won't do on camera. I'd love to see her in a hardcore boy-girl scene too. But if she is only willing to do blowjob or handjob or massage, whatever, I would rather see her in these scenes than have no scenes at all.
 
I could agree with you there freejames, except that she has already done bg scenes; intercourse and anal on some shoddy videos, bj and gotten eaten out for Hegre, and got fingered and played with for X-Art. I find it hard to believe that she found Jesus and decided to be a bornagain Christian given her current line of work and the tease gets old. It's one thing to just not do another BG scene, but to parade around like one is coming up when it's not the case is just annoying.
 
^ Im not after only hardcore and i didnt want it to seem that way, since i watch all type of porn from solo, gg to gonzo and hardcore. (Matter of fact two of my favorite sites are inthecrack and ftvgirls) Anyways. My main point was wowgirls purposelly trying to make it out as they have new clover bg footage. For example when the first preview photos were released of clover and gina gerson with isiah. Everyone asked "wtf no fucking for clover?" and they ignored answering, even though they answer just about anything you tweet their way. By ignoring and releasing previews that make it look like she has shoot bg, leads ppl to asume that there is actual sex for clover in those scenes which according to one a director their isnt. Why no just say that then? I mean they are just baiting ppl to buy sub for that scene, which dosent contain that type of "action". If she did bj/hj/or just massage scene just say that then.

The reason i said im skippin it is, because im not a member of their sites. And "just" hj/massage/bj action isnt worth the 35 EUR membership price.

smawshot_1977. The bg action she shot in the past, she shot with her bf(s) at the time and not random male talent. If she dosent want to shoot bg with random guys its her right. Marry pie (another mosly soft girl) only also shot with her (ex) boyfriend, and has said she aint shooting any more. And there are a bunch of other girls who wont shoot with random males and only with their real life bf.
 
They cum on her hot 18year old look like body dont care how but they cummed on her and that his how she should look like full of cum
 
Top