Je suis charlie hebdo

you're such a fucking idiot!
who insulted who? it was just humour (but these shity people have zero humour)
killing people for a draw... :facepalm:

hope the cops gonna shoot these two piece of shit!

moved to ignore list.


yes ! I agree ! so many people say ' it's they're own fault, they should not have insulted them ' .. oh common.. we live in a freedom of speech western world. seriously.. what is next ? they are going to attack the freeones board because muslims do not agree on porn ?! think about it !!
 
...well, in the end it´s always IMPORTANT WHO makes PROFIT ( financially and by might ) out of a case like this ....AL KAIDA ?? ...so WHO IS Al Kaida, and WHO is the BOSS of Al Kaida ?? Are the murderers responsible ?? YES and NO , cause they´re * only * lil azzholes, *driven* by Al Kaida ... I´m SURE , the BOSS (es) NEVEREVER will do the killing by themselves .
In my eyes, anyone can believe in what he wants . If I put my right middelfinger into my azz waiting for electricity to come and *believe* into my middlefinger so no problem, that finger IS GOD . As far as none is treatened wrong EVERYONE can believe in whatever he want´s ....and EVERYONE can say WHATEVER he wants .
 

CrimsonBolt

I AM A SLUT FOR RYAN GOSLING
the 3 piece of shit got finally shot yesterday :)
but the third one kill 4 other people (jew this time) :(
i'm curious to know what these people do to them? what is the excuse to come in a cacher market?
what the jew from France did to them?
 
We are free, we are talking, that's all folks ^^

Charlie for ever!

And Le Canard Enchaîné too!

"Live free or die" was our first slogan, do not let it be our last.
 
je ne suis pas Charlie hebdo! To put it bluntly, people die every day and I don't see threads about them.
 
je no compres pas
 
‘…the mass media. What are they? They're huge corporations, massive corporations, linked up with even bigger corporations. They sell audiences to other businesses, namely advertisers. So when you turn on the television set, CBS doesn't make any money. They make money from the advertisers. You're the product that they're selling, and the same is true of the daily newspaper. They're huge corporations, selling audiences, potential consumers, to other businesses, all linked up closely to the government, especially the big media. What picture of the world do you expect them to present? ’ - Noam Chomsky, Sparrow Talks with Noam Chomsky



A predictive programming false flag occurrence. In any event, the French media got what the deserved. Don't disrespect and/or blaspheme the God or the prophets of God of any religion. There is no such thing as free speech in the press anyways its all corporate owned and controlled.

No speech is free period. If the NFL refs want to throw a game like in the Detroit Dallas Wild Card game, a player or coach gets fined tens of thousands of dollars for saying anything in protest. If the illuminatii satanic controlled puppet press wants to direct negative dispersions at Muslims, then nobody is stopping them, but the price for making those comments in a public forum is death. Like wise the alleged shooters price for standing up for their religion in such a way is death as well.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol

A predictive programming false flag occurrence. In any event, the French media got what the deserved. Don't disrespect and/or blaspheme the God or the prophets of God of any religion. There is no such thing as free speech in the press anyways its all corporate owned and controlled.


Predictive programming is often found in the science fiction genre.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=..._6HmuuqYf8WFTReNOMH1RdA&bvm=bv.83339334,d.eXY

http://conspiracypsychology.com/201...e-programming-is-psychologically-implausible/

Don't clutter a perfectly good pissing match with your potatoe wizardry.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
Almost as ridiculous as predictive programming and anything from the mind of Senhor Batata.


tumblr_nhyx3ftb_ZG1s4lolfo1_1280.jpg
 
Salman Rushdie is on the panel, so this is worth its weight in gold even if you hate Bill Maher.



It's shocking when Maher goes thru each incident since 9/11. And that's just the stuff that's been covered.

I think he nails it when he says: "When there's this many bad apples, there's something wrong with the orchard."

Thanks for posting that vid.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
Wait, I thought you closed your account. What kind of sorcery is this?
 

Mayhem

Banned
Next Charlie Hebdo Cover Unveiled

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/next-charlie-hebdo-cover-unveiled/

The editors of France's satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo unveiled the cover of their next issue, the first to come out after last week's deadly shootings that left 10 staffers and 2 police dead in Paris.

The cover has an Arabic man - possibly Mohammed or some other prophet - holding up a "Je suis Charlie" sign. A single tear is falling from his eye. Above the man is the caption "Tout est Pardonne" - all is forgiven.

Last Wed., masked gunmen shouting "Allahu akbar!" stormed the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo at noon during an editorial meeting. They headed straight for the paper's editor,Stephane Charbonnier, killing him and his police bodyguard. With military-style precision, they went to slaughter seven other journalists, a maintenance worker and a visitor.

A policewoman was killed Thursday, and four people were slain at a kosher supermarket Friday before the gunmen were killed by police in two nearly simultaneous clashes with security forces around Paris.

Since then, an outpouring of support for the battered editorial staff hasa been felt round the world. The "Je suis Charlie" - I am Charlie - hashtag has proliferated on social media.

A massive rally was held Sunday in France for the victims of the attack.

After the world wide show of support, Charlie Hebdo was set to publish 1 million issues on Wed, instead of its regular run of 60,000 copies.

On Monday night, CBS News' Elizabeth Palmer reported the Charlie Hebdo run would be 3 million.

Charlie.JPG
 

Mayhem

Banned
Muslims' mixed response to new Mohammed cover

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/living/muslims-respond-hebdo/


It is a message of defiance, but also forgiveness -- and many Muslims responded with similarly mixed emotions.

It is a magazine cover depicting the Prophet Mohammed with a tear falling from his cheek, holding a sign that says, "Je suis Charlie," the slogan that became a worldwide meme. Above Mohammed are the words "All Is Forgiven."

On Wednesday, two Muslim extremists attacked the offices of Charlie Hebdo, a French magazine with a history of mocking Mohammed. Twelve were killed, including several top editors, by two men with terrorist connections who said they were avenging the prophet.

Many Muslims object to any depictions of Mohammed -- respectful or not -- saying that such images defy his teachings and lead to idolatry.

For the secular satirists at Charlie Hebdo, neither of those concerns seemed to matter much. They often lampooned Mohammad, crudely caricaturing him as a backward, foolish figure.

It's not surprising that, in its first issue since the attack, Charlie Hebdo again put Mohammed on the cover. But this time, instead of showing the the prophet in an unflattering light, the magazine struck a far different tone -- and was received by some Muslims in a far different way.

"My initial thought is that the cover is a near perfect response to the tragedy," said Hussein Rashid, a professor of Islamic thought at Hofstra University in New York.

"They are not backing down from the depiction of Mohammed, exercising their free speech rights. At the same time, the message is conciliatory, humble, and will hopefully reduce the anger directed to the Muslim communities of France."

Zineb El Rhazoui, a columnist at Charlie Hebdo magazine who worked on the new issue, told the BBC that the staff didn't want to express hate toward the terrorists who killed her colleagues.

"The (mobilization) that happened in France after this horrible crime must open the door to forgiveness. Everyone must think about this forgiveness."

Chosen by Charlie Hebdo's editors on Monday night, the cover was released by Liberation, the French newspaper that is sharing its office space with staffers from the satirical magazine.

Many media outlets have republished the cover in a show of solidarity. The issue will hit newsstands this Wednesday in a flood of 3 million copies translated into multiple languages.

As the new cover spread across social media, Muslims responded with a mix of emotions, from wariness to appreciation, from miffed to dismissive.

Yahya Adel Ibrahim, an imam in Australia, counseled his 100,000 Facebook followers to follow the example of Mohammed, even as they encounter images that many may consider to be offensive.

"As it is clear that the cartoons are to be published again, Muslims will inevitably be hurt and angered, but our reaction must be a reflection of the teachings of the one we love & are angered for," Ibrahim said. "Enduring patience, tolerance, gentleness and mercy as was the character of our beloved Prophet ... is the best and immediate way to respond."

On Twitter, some Muslims were skeptical that publishing an image that many consider offensive should be construed as an act of solidarity.

Capture.JPG

Other Muslims said they appreciate the magazine's sentiments.

Rashid noted that the cover's central message -- forgiveness -- resonates not only throughout Islam but through other world religions as well. "The cover is a call to our better angels, and an acknowledgment that religion also offers good to the world."

Other Muslim leaders were more critical of the cover.

"That the depiction appears benign is of little consequence because it will be seen as offensive and deliberately provocative," said Dawud Walid, executive director of the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

There's nothing in the Quran, Islam's primary text, about depicting the prophet. But according to the hadith, stories and sayings attributed to Mohammed and his companions, he discouraged Muslims from making images of him.

Walid said that Charlie Hebdo's new cover "will offend many" but noted that "over 99.999% of France's 5 million Muslims acted peacefully when the previous depiction was released."

Yasir Qadhi, an American cleric with a wide following, said he's not pleased by any depictions of Mohammed, but it's clear that this Hebdo cover, unlike others, is not meant to offend.

Qadhi also said that while he respects the right to free speech, there appears to be a double standard when it comes to what Western society -- and Hebdo -- find suitable for mocking.

"Did you happen to notice any cartoons mocking the death of the cartoonists themselves, and lampooning their work and efforts?" Qadhi asked.

Satire of the type attempted by Charlie Hebdo often serves a valuable end, said Omid Safi, director of Islamic studies at Duke University. But, like Qadhi, Safi faulted the French magazine for misfiring in its choice of targets.

"I see satire as always having a purpose of mocking the powers that be, hierarchy, power, unearned privileged. So who are we speaking power to today?" Safi said. "Sure, violent terrorists.

"But what about all the other agents of violence, including the state-sponsored ones? That's why I don't find Charlie Hebdo particularly good satire."

Many Muslims seemed content not to comment on Hebdo's latest depiction of their prophet, or to ignore it altogether.

"Let us ignore the provocations and defamation and get about the work of being a source of good and mercy to all we may come into contact with," Imam Zaid Shakir, a popular cleric and scholar from California, posted on Facebook this week. "May Allah bless you all and make things easy for you and your families during these trying times."


My thing is, why are we insisting that it's a depiction of Mohammed? It's a cartoon of an Arab/Muslim man, but there's no label or identifier to say that it's necessarily Mohammed. People just insist of being offended/overwrought/outraged. :pacing:
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
My thing is, why are we insisting that it's a depiction of Mohammed? It's a cartoon of an Arab/Muslim man, but there's no label or identifier to say that it's necessarily Mohammed. People just insist of being offended/overwrought/outraged. :pacing:

I'm with you on this. If I wanted to depict a cartoon of Jewish support, he would have a black coat with a beard and curly sideburns and a hat. Oriental would be slant eyes and a tangle hat. What is this thing about a turban dressed in white with facial hair being offensive? Is that all we need to project an image of disrespect? If the lead character in a comedic farce movie is named Mohamed, does that get your panties in a bunch because it's the same name as your prophet? Get over yourselves "moderate" Muslims. Go watch The Life of Brian.
 
Top