CityOfCompton said:He, of all people, married Holly Robinson.
And it's not even like he was a star.
he has a point...
CityOfCompton said:He, of all people, married Holly Robinson.
And it's not even like he was a star.
Peter Gazinya said:Hell, you guys are all full of shit. Anybody who knows football knows that the best back up QB ever was Eugene Graborski. You may not recognize the name but those of us who REALLY know football do.
For a while here we were lucky enough to be graced by his presence. He used to post on here under the screen name of .....HOTROD11INCHES.
mcrocket said:Personally. I never judge a QB by how many TD's they throw. I judge them on their quarterback rating. A would rather have a QB that throw 20 TD's a year and 5 Interceptions. Then one that throws 50 TD's per year and throws 40 Interceptions.
Dirty Sanchez said:In football, the only thing that should matter, especially with a QB, is wins. More important, Super Bowl wins. Tom Brady has 3 rings in 4 years.
Peyton is one of the best because of how smart he is, and how he calls a game (the best for that in a while IMO). But when the shit is on the line, Brady has stepped up, while fools like McNabb have chocked (4 times in a row).
CityOfCompton said:What about Heath Schuler?
D-rock said:Ok, you told us that you thought he was the greatest quarterback ever, but can you tell us why you think that way. I'm curious.
Even most Lion fans hope to never hear his name again. I sort of liked him though. While living in Michigan and not being a Lions fan I could always point up at the screen and laugh at them. Of course they could always counter telling me I was a Bears fan and they were just as bad. Does anybody remember Rodney was with Detroit and they had three lousy QB that they couldn’t decide on? Those were the days.
Dirty Sanchez said:In football, the only thing that should matter, especially with a QB, is wins. More important, Super Bowl wins. Tom Brady has 3 rings in 4 years.
D-rock said:I don't agree, an individual player’s ability shouldn't be based on a team's accomplishments, especially in (American)football where it harder to separate who should deserve what credit on a play, unlike in other sports like baseball. If you just went by Superbowl wins Kerry Colins would be better than Dan Marino.
Dirty Sanchez said:However, in their prime's (well, that would be now for TB), who would you rather have walking into a championship game; Marino or Brady? Montana or Marino? Elway of McNabb?
Dirty Sanchez said:However, in their prime's (well, that would be now for TB), who would you rather have walking into a championship game; Marino or Brady? Montana or Marino? Elway of McNabb?
D-rock said:Marino over Brady
Montana over Marino
Elway over McNabb
Payton over Brady
In fact everybody above with the possible exception of McNabb I would choose over Brady.
About Kerry Collins, I thought he was with the Ravens the year he won. If he wasn't, just substitute whoever was that year in his place, or the person who won with Tampa Bay a few years ago. I wouldn’t think they were better than Marino and Jim Kelly just because they have never won a Superbowl.