via the natural way or IVF? I'm asking on behalf of a concerned friend.. he's impotent but his GF wants a baby badly. They've found a suitable donor but IVF is frought with time consuming difficulty especially for the woman. She simply wants to just fuck the guy (who also apparently has a MUCH bigger dick), and my friend is concerned she might enjoy it too much and orgasm on it. Not only is he impotent, but he's also quite tiny down there. What advice should I give the couple? :dunno::dunno:
If you are Impotent will you allow your Girlfriend to have another Man's Baby?
- Thread starter zdenka
- Start date
Yes, but the girl believes it's just quicker and easier. Besides if it works, it's just a one time experience. She's not cheating on him. I'm considering to tell the girl just fuck the guy alone in a hotel.. but don't tell her boyfriend until afterwards.
Have the donor jack off into a funnel :rubbel:
In all seriousness though, I agree with supadupafly, sex with someone outside of marriage is a nonstarter, especially if there is concern she's gonna get sexually attached. If I was him I'd atually be more offended that she even brought up wanting to fuck him than the idea of another man's baby in general. Doesn't exactly sound committed.
In all seriousness though, I agree with supadupafly, sex with someone outside of marriage is a nonstarter, especially if there is concern she's gonna get sexually attached. If I was him I'd atually be more offended that she even brought up wanting to fuck him than the idea of another man's baby in general. Doesn't exactly sound committed.
This whole situation is heading for disaster. First off you only mentioned that she wants a baby. Does he? Does he mind the idea of raising someone else's kid? Unforunately impotence can have a pretty big strain on a relationship and I don't see this one heading down a healthy path. If I were him, keep pushing for IVF.
IVF or sperm bank is the only way to go. Otherwise, every time he sees the child he`s going to be reminded of the time his girlfriend got fucked by someone else, with unavoidable mental images of her having her tits sucked by someone else and her pussy being rammed by another guy`s cock. Of course, he might get turned on by that. But it sounds like a Very Bad Idea to me.
You know, in movies, television, or books, when someone says "I'm asking for a friend" it's usually just a way not to say that one asks for themselves. Not that that would be a problem.
Now, as mentioned - adoption could be an option. Though the relationship Mother-Child needs a lot of initial bonding, and isn't always the easiest. Especially when the mother is fertile and fully capable of having children of her own.
The bond between a mother and a child she has carried for 9 months within her, is stronger.
Now from a social and ethical standpoint: in vitro fertilization is the most commonly accepted, through sperm-banks it can be anonimous so that one does not have to do anything with the sperm donor, if the "father" has an extremely low sperm count and incapable of reproduction in the natural way this could still wield some results. It also puts little stress on the man in the couple, as there is no sex involved.
From a purely psicological view point, for the woman, being impregnated via the natural way has the best effect (usually). Size doesn't really matter, it's not a size issue, and just because a woman has had bigger penises inside her, doesn't mean she can't enjoy sex with a smaller one (than the biggest she had) in future. Also it is said that not always bigger = better, with much bigger than usual penises, certain women do feel discomfort. Rumor has it that the middle way is the goal to success, in size issues.
Size issue appart - having an orgasm or not, well an orgasm is just as much a physiological effect as it is psycological. The psyche can surpress an orgasm up to a certain point, if this should be desired. From a purely evolutionary-physiological view-point, the orgasm can aid in conception. Though of course it can also occur without.
The one thing not to do, is do things behind the back of the other!
Having children should be a serious commitment on both sides. The way it happens should be accepted by both.
Also a one-time thing is not necessarily enough for a succesful fertilization. Though once again, it can happen, doesn't mean it has to happen. Most succesful course is usually to calculate the most fertile time of the woman's period (which covers approximately 3 days of very high fertility) and have sex at least twice a day, on each of those 3 days.
impdaddy
Now, as mentioned - adoption could be an option. Though the relationship Mother-Child needs a lot of initial bonding, and isn't always the easiest. Especially when the mother is fertile and fully capable of having children of her own.
The bond between a mother and a child she has carried for 9 months within her, is stronger.
Now from a social and ethical standpoint: in vitro fertilization is the most commonly accepted, through sperm-banks it can be anonimous so that one does not have to do anything with the sperm donor, if the "father" has an extremely low sperm count and incapable of reproduction in the natural way this could still wield some results. It also puts little stress on the man in the couple, as there is no sex involved.
From a purely psicological view point, for the woman, being impregnated via the natural way has the best effect (usually). Size doesn't really matter, it's not a size issue, and just because a woman has had bigger penises inside her, doesn't mean she can't enjoy sex with a smaller one (than the biggest she had) in future. Also it is said that not always bigger = better, with much bigger than usual penises, certain women do feel discomfort. Rumor has it that the middle way is the goal to success, in size issues.
Size issue appart - having an orgasm or not, well an orgasm is just as much a physiological effect as it is psycological. The psyche can surpress an orgasm up to a certain point, if this should be desired. From a purely evolutionary-physiological view-point, the orgasm can aid in conception. Though of course it can also occur without.
The one thing not to do, is do things behind the back of the other!
Having children should be a serious commitment on both sides. The way it happens should be accepted by both.
Also a one-time thing is not necessarily enough for a succesful fertilization. Though once again, it can happen, doesn't mean it has to happen. Most succesful course is usually to calculate the most fertile time of the woman's period (which covers approximately 3 days of very high fertility) and have sex at least twice a day, on each of those 3 days.
impdaddy
Last edited:
LMAO!! :1orglaugh so true! He's be imagining her pussy queefing over the guy's big fat cock. Then coming home all stretched and spent.. she'd be sexually satisfied in every possible way and look down upon his small cock and laugh :1orglaugh I think even though he's the jealous type, he's secretly turned on by that and so am I! :1orglaugh
Well technically it's her kid too... just mixed with another big dick handsome man bastard
No, I don't watch television
Yea, adoption sounds logical.. but as you said she wants to carry a baby inside her because the bonding would be stronger. Anyway, I don't see a problem with a 1-time fuck. Just fuck the baby out of her and leave!
I didn't fully dwelve into the psycological aspects for the impotent male partner.
In any case, the child will not be his biologically. So seeing it, he knows that. Doesn't mean he can't get attached to the little bugger, but genetically not his. Though a father is more than just a sperm-donor. It's someone who should help a child grow up, and form the person it will be. The father is he who is around, cares for a child, not the guy who's seed fertilized the egg.
Jealousy can be a big issue, and if they choose the natural way, it has to be clear to both.
Thing is knowing the sperm-donor (and eventually conceiving through copulation) can put a strain on all 3 parties. A sperm-donor who is known is different than an anonymous one from the sperm-bank, and might want to get involved in rearing the child (not necessarily in getting involved with the mother).
Also the non-legally-binding relationship Girlfriend/Boyfriend does not necessarily represent the ideal condition for conceiving a child this way (through a sperm-donor wether IVA or natural).
impdaddy
In any case, the child will not be his biologically. So seeing it, he knows that. Doesn't mean he can't get attached to the little bugger, but genetically not his. Though a father is more than just a sperm-donor. It's someone who should help a child grow up, and form the person it will be. The father is he who is around, cares for a child, not the guy who's seed fertilized the egg.
Jealousy can be a big issue, and if they choose the natural way, it has to be clear to both.
Thing is knowing the sperm-donor (and eventually conceiving through copulation) can put a strain on all 3 parties. A sperm-donor who is known is different than an anonymous one from the sperm-bank, and might want to get involved in rearing the child (not necessarily in getting involved with the mother).
Also the non-legally-binding relationship Girlfriend/Boyfriend does not necessarily represent the ideal condition for conceiving a child this way (through a sperm-donor wether IVA or natural).
impdaddyFirstly just to want to say thanks for your logical reply! You seem to be well knowledged on the matter, and it's enlightening me.. on behalf of my friend!
Lastly, I want to ask a SERIOUS question regarding the psychology of a girl once she has had sexual intercourse with the big dick guy. Do you think she will become emotionally and sexually attached to him if the experience goes amazingly well? (by 'well' I meaning orgasming on his cock and lots of kissing afterwards). Will my friend have high chancing of losing her heart forever...?
Thanks friend x
Yes I agree, but I'm hoping he can thrive off the jealousy to make the relationship work. Hopefully, the sperm-donor won't get involved in rearing the child.. there must be a contracted signed beforehand!
Lastly, I want to ask a SERIOUS question regarding the psychology of a girl once she has had sexual intercourse with the big dick guy. Do you think she will become emotionally and sexually attached to him if the experience goes amazingly well? (by 'well' I meaning orgasming on his cock and lots of kissing afterwards). Will my friend have high chancing of losing her heart forever...?
Thanks friend x
Anyway, I don't see a problem with a 1-time fuck. Just fuck the baby out of her and leave!
Thing is, what if 1-time fuck isn't enough?
Say she fucks the guy once, behind her man's back, and then she's NOT pregnant? She's gotta deal with the fact that she cheated, but hasn't gotten the child she wanted.
So what does she do? Try again 1-time only the next month?
That double post made me think... they could try by DP'ing her... fertile guy up her vag, her man up her bum...
impdaddyLOL that's what I first thought when you posted 'DP'
She better not! Well I hope not, because the man is considered a TOP tier donor, he's very potent (a big hunk of an athlete) dat bastard :1orglaugh BTW I've posted a serious question for you in post #17.. I'm desperate to hear your thoughts on that
She better not! Well I hope not, because the man is considered a TOP tier donor, he's very potent (a big hunk of an athlete) dat bastard :1orglaugh BTW I've posted a serious question for you in post #17.. I'm desperate to hear your thoughts on that
Will she become attached? - Only time and experience can tell that in the specific case.
Could she become attached? - That possibility always exists.
Is it a given fact that she has to get attached if it goes amazingly well? - No, it is not a necessary consequence.
If she already has a meaningful, loving and caring relationship, and a satisfying sexual life with her partner, then those are good chances that she will still be happy and attached to her boyfriend.
Perhaps it would be best to ask your question to a girl (any girl) . Here we are on a site, which presents porn stars, and where many girls who work or have worked in porn are present.
Quite a few of them have fucked, and worked with well endowed men like: Rocco Siffredi, Peter North, Lee Stone, Lexington Steele, Mandingo... and still many of them passed on to having sex with other guys and still enjoying it, and to having meaningful relationships.
Will my friend have high chancing of losing her heart forever...?
Thanks friend x
High chance? - Probably not.
Chance? - The same chance like every dude has, feelings can change over time.
If he loses her over this, it means that it was not meant to be.
impdaddySimilar threads
