How cute does a girl have to be to make you abandon your type?

[Icarus]

I'm just wondering because I know quite a few people who like thin chicks would love Kerry Marrie.
http://www.kingdomofhardcore.com/2004/scoreland/292/003.jpg

 

[Sweeper]

Ummm... I'm not sure if I understand your inquiry.

 

[lovethedawgs]

In my personal life, it boils down to personality and attitude. It doesn't matter how beautiful someone is if you can't carry on a conversation with them.

If you're talking strictly about porn, I think it's kind of the same thing. How a performer comes across in a scene - their energy, enthusiasm, etc. - goes a long way for me.

 

[Member2019]

Already my type!

I'm just wondering because I know quite a few people who like thin chicks would love Kerry Marrie.
http://www.kingdomofhardcore.com/2004/scoreland/292/003.jpg

First off, Kerry Marie is already my favorite FFW model, but that's my favorite type.
I really don't believe in a "weight limit," although far more 100lbs. women have bodies that don't give me anything to notice than most 150-200lbs.
Even my wife was only 125lbs. with a C cup when I first met her, and her ideal weight is 150-175lbs. with a DD cup in my opinion.

Because I do typically go for "hourglass" babes that have breeding hips and, typically, a matching, natural C+ cup due to the hourglass.
They can be thin, even size 0 or 2 and very short, but they must be hourglass.
They can be even size 24+ BBW, or 6' something, but they must be hourglass.
So if I have to pick a "type," it's not really weight-limited, it's hourglass.

I have no trouble lusting for Yurizan Beltran, she's 18 but an hourglass:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?p=567333

I guess I'm a guy who loves it when my friend's wives widen as they age or have children, while they call her "fat" -- even though she's just as slender (just wider).
Now if she "pears/bells out," no I don't go for that, but most don't because they had fairly good hourglass figures to begin with.
They just were 18 or 19 or hadn't had a child yet.

Kerry Marie is a hourglass FFW who is falible at any weight in my view.
The fact that she's got a sweet supermodel face is just the ultimate bonus.

 

[BNF]

I don't want to come in a be contrary after the Prof..... (j/k just a matter of taste!)

But IRL my type has never wavered for any woman that I had a relationship with. If I was out with friends and just wanted to hook up or something, then like many men, your type is often cast aside! (I also have a wider variety of types when it comes to porn stars and nude models )

It is no mystery what my real world type is - and my photoalbums (how old fashioned to say instead of my iPhoto library!) are flled with the same types. But, just the height, 5'9"-6', or the body type and weight (110-125?lb) are physically not enough. Breasts are important, but beautiful nipples are more so, and long hair has been a requirement too. But, above that, it's the face and unique features there that have drawn me in time and again. A long, maybe even called, prominent nose, larger eyes, big wide smile and the like.

And before someone comes along and cries, "Stereotypical men" - "You may be missing your soulmate because you only go out with models or whatever" - I haven't invested in a relationship with anyone that wasn't also a decent and interesting woman. It may be true that someone out there is a perfect mental match for me, but the wrong body type - but that may be one of life's who knows, who cares. I don't know who may strike me tomorrow - sometimes I have no control over it. But, as I've posted before, I remember learning that in evolutionary terms, we are attracted to people that look like ourselves.

- Side note of something I've been meaning to post: The only physical characteristic that all of the worlds' cultures share in the definition of beautiful is - good complexion. -

 

[robertodiaz123]

Ummm... I'm not sure if I understand your inquiry.

I'm with you....

 

[juballs]

i sort of get it...

well the women i was into and this includes the wife, all have large breasts.

even pornstars i see, i would much rather like to see a larger chest, not huge but there has to be something there.

i can only think of one exception to this, and that is early Nikki Nova, a very attractive woman when she started, an A cup but very attractive.
so well thats the only one that has happened to me

 

[jod0565]

How cute does a girl have to be to make you abandon your type?

Just a little bit.

 

[Mole]

I am usually not into Asian chicks but I just love Tera Patrick (well, the pre-boob-job version). I think it's that full-bodied figure. And BTW, Michelle_Akemi, your sig picture (if that's really you) looks hot too

 

[Member2019]

I don't want to come in a be contrary after the Prof..... (j/k just a matter of taste!)

Who says you're being contrary to me.
The only time I can't see someone's side is when the "conspiracy theories" don't match up to my inside experience (or basic science) in the small, few topics I've around my career.
But opinions are opinions, and when presented as such (mine included), people will differ and I more than respect that.

But IRL my type has never wavered for any woman that I had a relationship with. If I was out with friends and just wanted to hook up or something, then like many men, your type is often cast aside! (I also have a wider variety of types when it comes to porn stars and nude models )

You have to be "happy" for the long-term, and that means you're type is your type.
Many of us "enjoy" people of many variety impromptu, but when it comes to the same lover, we're definitely going to have our preferences.
And why not? There's NOTHING wrong with that.

It is no mystery what my real world type is - and my photoalbums (how old fashioned to say instead of my iPhoto library!) are flled with the same types. But, just the height, 5'9"-6', or the body type and weight (110-125?lb) are physically not enough. Breasts are important, but beautiful nipples are more so, and long hair has been a requirement too. But, above that, it's the face and unique features there that have drawn me in time and again. A long, maybe even called, prominent nose, larger eyes, big wide smile and the like.

The only thing I see some men do is deny themselves 90% of what they like in a woman because of 10% that doesn't "fit their standards."
Yet inside, they want like her, and then weeks later, they regret it because that 10% didn't seem like such a big deal now.
In many cases, it's when they are away from their friends who talk about that 10% that was noticable.
I don't think negatively of such men, I feel for them, because they may have "missed out" on what they really do like.
I know I have done this several times in my life, and the only thing that keeps me sane is that everything I did ended up leading me to my wife.

And before someone comes along and cries, "Stereotypical men" - "You may be missing your soulmate because you only go out with models or whatever" - I haven't invested in a relationship with anyone that wasn't also a decent and interesting woman. It may be true that someone out there is a perfect mental match for me, but the wrong body type - but that may be one of life's who knows, who cares. I don't know who may strike me tomorrow - sometimes I have no control over it.

Yep, everything else aside, part of the relationship is PHYSICAL.
I don't see myself marrying a woman who isn't an hourglass figure, I need that hourglass.
But one nice thing about an hourglass figure babe is that most tend to look similar with or without weight.
And if you're into breasts (that's just a bonus for me), hourglass babes tend to be proportional when it comes to their breasts.

But, as I've posted before, I remember learning that in evolutionary terms, we are attracted to people that look like ourselves.

I have to disagree, I have almost always dated women HEAVIER than myself (unless they were short), although if I dated now, I'm not as thin as when I met my wife (and the years of dating before that when I was thin .

- Side note of something I've been meaning to post: The only physical characteristic that all of the worlds' cultures share in the definition of beautiful is - good complexion. -

Agreed, the social acceptance is typically such.
Although not all of us care about a "good complexion" either.

 

[Member2019]

i sort of get it...
well the women i was into and this includes the wife, all have large breasts.
even pornstars i see, i would much rather like to see a larger chest, not huge but there has to be something there.

As much as we talk about marriage being non-physical, the reality is, I need a woman I can "tit-fuck" to be happy.
It is a physical requirement that I want and would be disappointed without.
She being an hourglass is also a requirement, because I want her to look similar and proportional with any weight loss or gain.
I've seen too many thinner women grow into a pear/bell, so I typically go for a woman already sporting more "womanhood" like features.

Should both of my wife's breasts fall to breast cancer, I would be disappointed, but I'd love her because she's my best friend.
It's the one thing that would make me reconsider implants, and strongly at that.
And I'd be honest with her to tell her I would like her with implants in that case.
If she only lost one breast, that wouldn't be a problem though, I've never been grossed out by the woman I dated who only had 1 breast (and basically a "crater" for the other).
If anything, she was extremely affectionate (since so many had hurt her emotionally when they saw her nude).

i can only think of one exception to this, and that is early Nikki Nova, a very attractive woman when she started, an A cup but very attractive.
so well thats the only one that has happened to me

I'm just lucky I not only got what I wanted in a lover, but far, far more than I expected.

 

[boatiuta]

Well, if I were to meet Mya Nichole looking like this...

http://greatporn.asstitans.com/assesaz/mya-nicole3.html

That would be enough for me.

 

[mongo18]

She would have to rate a "yes," ( I think the whole 1-10 scale is bullshit and have replaced it with my own scale of yes-no, which is far more efficient and economical).

 

[Rey C.]

She would have to rate a "yes," ( I think the whole 1-10 scale is bullshit and have replaced it with my own scale of yes-no, which is far more efficient and economical).

Now that's funny! Yep, definitely more efficient.

My "type" has more to do with personality than physical traits. So a half way cute girl with a bubbly, fun personality, who is also bright, wins hands down over some smoking beauty who has her head up her ass and has the personality of a rock.

And even though a great butt and nice boobs are a turn on, since I've never heard a boob or a butt talk... after the deed is done, what good are they?

 

[gunslingingbird]

She would have to rate a "yes," ( I think the whole 1-10 scale is bullshit and have replaced it with my own scale of yes-no, which is far more efficient and economical).

^ What he said. :yesyes:

 

[Ainttalkinlove]

How cute would a girl have to be tomake me abondon my type?



Cute girls are my type.

 

[Ace Bandage]

Appearance wise, I look for four Ts in women: thin, toned, tanned, and tight. That's it, I don't really deviate from that. It's just what I prefer. I have nothing against fuller figure women, I just wouldn't date one.