bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
"How do you know she's a witch?"
"She looks like one."
Historical Examples of "Fake News"
- Thread starter Luxman
- Start date
"How do you know she's a witch?"
"She looks like one."
Jack Davenport
Banned
I wanted all kinds of **** to come out about her, even straw grasping crap like Anonymous' supposed video of Bubba ****** some girl.
I did not hear of PizzaGate until about 2 weeks ago. If I did hear about it before the election, it didn't get my attention and I, a very partisan anti Clinton person shrugged it off as nonsense.
That doesn't qualify as fake news to me..
I think she alluded to PizzaGate as one of the fake news stories that hurt her.
"How do you know she's a witch?"
"She looks like one."
:1orglaugh
I really don't think so, BC. At least not that I've heard.
Not to defend her, Pizzagate is far from being the one thing that cauht her the election but today, with Facebook, Twitter and all other social medias, 10 days is largely enough for a trend to grow and impact a lot of people.
With some key swing-states being won by Trump by a very slight margin, PizzaGate copuld be the thing that cost her the state. So basically, PizzaGate could be the thing that cost her the election. But stil lthe blame is on her, her staff and the whole DNC : She was the weakest Democratic candidate in decades. A Decent candidate wouls have never be in a situation in which such a bogus story coukld cost him the election.
Hillary digged her own grave, Pizzagate just happened to be the one push that caused her to fall in it.
"pizzagate" had no appreciable effect. Nor any of this fringe bullshit that some people on internet forums <ahem> obsess over. What had an effect is what Trump promised to do and what he did do when it came to Carrier. The forgotten man/woman is what sunk Hillary. The guy with the pickup truck and hard hat who gets up at 4 in the morning instead of ******** in til 1 in the afternoon and roasting a bowl with his cheerios.
dat blue wall tho.
dat blue wall tho.
Ace Boobtoucher
Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
the gall of these people.
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
We know the msm lies to us everyday. We know they ignore certain things that even though important are not part of their agenda.
We know they promote a certain agenda for certain groups and attempt to hurt other groups.
We know they stage news also.
Anybody who at this point denies any of that should not be taken seriously on the subject.
They would either be ignorant, willfully ignorant, brainwashed, or just plain stupid.
So we know it's fake. We know they lie.
But do we know why?
Part 1
Lets think about it.
Newspaper, TV News, msm news websites. How do they make money?
Sure they advertise but that alone is not where most of the money comes from, especially now when channels like CNN have about the same viewership numbers as The Gardening Channel.
It's expensive to run these things. Printing and distributing printed news, Paying large, even huge salaries, equipment, licensing, many employees, ect ect.
TV comericials aren't enough to support all of this.
So as usual to find out the truth just follow the money.
Where do they get their money?
They get their money from Big Banks, Big Businesses and Corporations,and Foreign Donors. And domestic donors also to a lesser extant.
That is all you really need to know. From that you can figure out the rest.
Part 2
What exactly do you see when you watch TV news?
You see mostly opinion and commentary which equals basically propaganda. Propagandi that benifits the people who give them money.
The same goes for printed news.
They'll spend most of their time not actually reporting news but giving their opinion on what they choose as news. Telling you how you should feel about whatever they are promoting.
They'll bring out some faces to talk about it who usually are fucking clueless and a person to oppose it just for show but they are all part of it and getting paid from that same source money to sell the same stuff.
People say real journalism is dead.
Well yeah.
Why pay for investigative reporting when most of it winds up to be nothing sensational that will sell news?
It's much easier to just make news up.
So they are comprimised. They are corrupt. And they lie to you everday.
They are the real fake news.
If that doesn't make them an enemy of the United States I dont know what does.
And it's like this in most countries but The USA is surely the worst.
Part 3
So we know they lie.
I don't hide the fact that I believe most all of the shootings and other ****** events are fake.
People say that's crazy, they wouldn't do that.
Well we know they lie for a living. We know where their money comes from. We know to them the meaning of the word truth is "how much money can we make off of this?".
So why wouldn't they promote and cover-up and help create hoaxes like Sandy Hook, Boston, and Orlando?
They get away with it every time and they make millions. Millions. And the people inolved get rich too.
They have no moral line they won't cross. Anything goes if there is money to be made.
We know they promote a certain agenda for certain groups and attempt to hurt other groups.
We know they stage news also.
Anybody who at this point denies any of that should not be taken seriously on the subject.
They would either be ignorant, willfully ignorant, brainwashed, or just plain stupid.
So we know it's fake. We know they lie.
But do we know why?
Part 1
Lets think about it.
Newspaper, TV News, msm news websites. How do they make money?
Sure they advertise but that alone is not where most of the money comes from, especially now when channels like CNN have about the same viewership numbers as The Gardening Channel.
It's expensive to run these things. Printing and distributing printed news, Paying large, even huge salaries, equipment, licensing, many employees, ect ect.
TV comericials aren't enough to support all of this.
So as usual to find out the truth just follow the money.
Where do they get their money?
They get their money from Big Banks, Big Businesses and Corporations,and Foreign Donors. And domestic donors also to a lesser extant.
That is all you really need to know. From that you can figure out the rest.
Part 2
What exactly do you see when you watch TV news?
You see mostly opinion and commentary which equals basically propaganda. Propagandi that benifits the people who give them money.
The same goes for printed news.
They'll spend most of their time not actually reporting news but giving their opinion on what they choose as news. Telling you how you should feel about whatever they are promoting.
They'll bring out some faces to talk about it who usually are fucking clueless and a person to oppose it just for show but they are all part of it and getting paid from that same source money to sell the same stuff.
People say real journalism is dead.
Well yeah.
Why pay for investigative reporting when most of it winds up to be nothing sensational that will sell news?
It's much easier to just make news up.
So they are comprimised. They are corrupt. And they lie to you everday.
They are the real fake news.
If that doesn't make them an enemy of the United States I dont know what does.
And it's like this in most countries but The USA is surely the worst.
Part 3
So we know they lie.
I don't hide the fact that I believe most all of the shootings and other ****** events are fake.
People say that's crazy, they wouldn't do that.
Well we know they lie for a living. We know where their money comes from. We know to them the meaning of the word truth is "how much money can we make off of this?".
So why wouldn't they promote and cover-up and help create hoaxes like Sandy Hook, Boston, and Orlando?
They get away with it every time and they make millions. Millions. And the people inolved get rich too.
They have no moral line they won't cross. Anything goes if there is money to be made.
Luxman
#TRE45ON
Those shootings are real, some of them are staged false-flags, the shooters being controlled participants.
Think "Manchurian Candidate", psychology, audio subliminal programming, psychological mind control is a very exact and powerful science.
The main purpose of psychology is to control and manipulate people, and it is suprisingly easy.
The only way you'll get to learn about it is if you get a degree in psychology, or know people who are psychologists.
The rest, the conspiracies, are disinformation to confuse the public from knowing the truth.
Yeah, I know, I also thought this was all BS conspiracy theories, but I learned the truth thru some friends.
Believe what you want, I know this is true, I've seen enough proof to believe it without a doubt.
Even if I had proof to show you, you would still not believe it. You would need to get the info from someone you trust to believe it.
acenipplelicker
Banned
pizza gate is on the other thread---these threads should be merged
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46006.htm
Blacklist Promoted by the Washington Post Has Apparent Ties to Ukrainian Fascism and CIA Spying
Blacklist Promoted by the Washington Post Has Apparent Ties to Ukrainian Fascism and CIA Spying
Actually it's compomission, not fake news.
Fake news : News that are not true.
A political debate is not "news".
What I think of fake news, I think about
- Obama is coming for your guns
- Obama will declare martial law and cancel the election
- Obama is gonna put americans in FEMA camps
- The UN will put americans into hobbit holes
Etc...
And many other **** we've been hearing fror the last 8 years on Alex Jones channel and other Alt-Right medias but never actually happened. But they are still pretending it wil happen very soon
Jack Davenport
Banned
Another example of fake news.
http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-bosnia-sniper-fire-2016-6
http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-bosnia-sniper-fire-2016-6
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
I don't know if this qualifies as fake news. We remember Brian Williams. Same as Dan Rather. The news being reported didn't check their sources and/or just openly lied. They had a story but couldn't dump it when it didn't become the story they wanted to tell. Could or should we differentiate between bad fact finding and **** just made up by accusations?
acenipplelicker
Banned
as long as we are talking CNN
is SMERCONISH good and it it fake
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
Are you shitting me?
(I never really use that phrase but now seems like the right time)
So is you is or is you ain't shitting me?
And no acenip, the threads should not be merged. They are 2 different topics.
Why don't we just merge all threads into one big blob of **** while we're at it.
acenipplelicker
Banned
smerconish is not fake news
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
Similar threads
