The best thing about it now is even Chelsea's. name is mud now, too. Their dynasty is officially over.
Hillary Clinton and Uranium One
- Thread starter Straight Shooter
- Start date
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
donna brazile
So she says
Hiliary bought the nomination.
Shouldn't that be high treason?
About as high as it gets treason.
Funny, I remember saying so many times that the Dem Primary was rigged.
How there is no way that creature could come even close to beating Sanders.
And I remember being riduculed for it.
But now we know its true.
Then I remember saying that I am 100% sure Hiliary had the questions (therefore answers) ahead of time in the 1st debate.
I knew this on body language alone, from her eyes and facial expressions.....it was so obvious.
And I remember being riduculed for it.
But now we know that's true as well.
I wonder what else I am right about ...........
So she says
Hiliary bought the nomination.
Shouldn't that be high treason?
About as high as it gets treason.
Funny, I remember saying so many times that the Dem Primary was rigged.
How there is no way that creature could come even close to beating Sanders.
And I remember being riduculed for it.
But now we know its true.
Then I remember saying that I am 100% sure Hiliary had the questions (therefore answers) ahead of time in the 1st debate.
I knew this on body language alone, from her eyes and facial expressions.....it was so obvious.
And I remember being riduculed for it.
But now we know that's true as well.
I wonder what else I am right about ...........
Supafly
Retired Mod
Do not misunderstand me, though:
US politics at this moment has a lot of layers, and thus, it is not as easy to pick who you should support or whom you should condemn.
Sanders was the only one who managed to create a support base financing his campaign by small, monthly payments of around $27, making him the only not in the pocket of big donors with personal agendas. But if you look at what the Republicans are doing with their pklans to rape the smaller people worse than people could imagine before, shooting a trillion-dollar-hole in the economy for their billionaire donors tax holes, and instead of improving a health system, kicking millions off insurance. This is shark capitalism, and so, as flawed as the other side is, and as much as it has to change:
It is really not a hard thing to look at the whole picture and say:
You need a democrat government, and fast.
You think we need government by way of the groups that just flagrantly violated one of the most cherished rights in America, the right to vote?
You people really do think your shit doesn't stink.
You hungover???
Mayhem
Banned
Supafly
Retired Mod
No, it is a little bit more complicated than that.
Right now, you have TWO choices, short-term. And #1 is blatantly swamping you and in bed with Russia. #2 is corrupt, too, and has suely some ties, too. But the politics of#2 are - short-term! - better.
Mid-termn, you need a MASSIVE initiative to overcome "Citizens United" and compketely overwork the rules for campaign financing. Bernie had it going, and others could do so, too. Possibly, both Democrats and Republicans as a party have to go and you need a comükete new party system. Long-term.
Oh yeah I’m on vacation in Florida baby.
Mayhem
Banned
I was actually talking to the other guy, but glad to get the update. Don't let any stingrays bite yer pecker. :hatsoff:
Their "dynasty" was over last November. Actually it was over even sooner, but it took that loss to affirm it.
Republicans seem to be the only ones who have continued to speak of her as if she continues to possess some kind of undying love and controlling power among democrats. She doesn't.
No. That doesn't fit the definition of treason.
Funny, I remember saying so many times that the Dem Primary was rigged.
How there is no way that creature could come even close to beating Sanders.
And I remember being riduculed for it.
But now we know its true.
Even without the DNC's favoritism Hillary would have won.
Multiple analyses have affirmed that.
That doesn't make it right. Doesn't excuse it. Just means that in the end Clinton still would have been the nominee.
Then I remember saying that I am 100% sure Hiliary had the questions (therefore answers) ahead of time in the 1st debate.
That you were right about. Good call! (although I'm not sure it was the first debate?)
I wonder what else I am right about ...........
Well, you were wildly off on the popular vote, which as I recall you predicted would be Trump winning with 80 to 85 percent - and wound up Clinton 48.5 to Trump 46.4
Chelsea was no doubt going to continue the legacy on. Most likely she still will try to move up the ranks of the party, but now that her parents - particularly her mother - have been exposed as just greasy as shit, it certainly doesn't help her name.
For the record I like Bill Clinton, I don't have this deep loathing for him that some right wingers like me have. Hillary, on the other hand, not so much.
bobjustbob
Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Every broken clock is accurate twice a day.
xfire
New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Now? lol That ship sailed thirty years ago, and the same people that loathed her yesterday will loathe her tomorrow and the ones that love her the same.
Similar threads
