RAWR!!! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!
("we're the good guys, y'know!")
Gaddafi captured / dead???
- Thread starter busenbust
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2011 mena protests
RAWR!!! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!
("we're the good guys, y'know!")
Will E Worm
Conspiracy...
WTF is wrong with you - Jon Stewart
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/jon-stew...addafis-death-what-the-fck-is-wrong-with-you/
emceeemcee
Banned
:angels:
democraOIL!, son
emceeemcee
Banned
outstanding post zdenka, keep up the good work and might just replace the worm as the most retarded member on the board!
Debate the topic, not insult the poster :angels: Anyway, it's a crazy world we live in. My post is just an Inconvenient Truth.
emceeemcee
Banned
your post is an example of what happens to people's brains when they breath through their mouth most of the time
Supafly
Retired Mod
I highly recommend that you guys first think about what you want to bring to the table, and THEN post it.
If you want to insukt people... there always is the chance You Might get an infraction, maybe even a ban
Is it worth it?
Thank you for reading this - and if unsure... maybe post tomorrow :2 cents:
If you want to insukt people... there always is the chance You Might get an infraction, maybe even a ban
Is it worth it?
Thank you for reading this - and if unsure... maybe post tomorrow :2 cents:
He was caught on video ALIVE.
DEAD a short while later.
Something isn't right. He should've stood trial; there was more to be gained from him living.
DEAD a short while later.
Something isn't right. He should've stood trial; there was more to be gained from him living.
And your post is a prime example of what happens when you become a bitter, hateful, sour human being.
most folks tend to "die from their wounds" .....when they've been shot point blank in the temple. :dunno:
the only thing to be gained from him living was to tell some inconvenient truths about global economics
We 'supported' regime change (that's illegal, btw) because Gaddafi was some brutal dictator? When do we invade Saudi Arabia? They are above and beyond Libya's totality.....
A Journey with a Thousand league begins with a single step
Be patient until the time is right to strike :angels:I'll be dead in 20 years or less.....so all I can do is just eek by every day and hope I've lived it the best as I could - so I'm not trying to be some crusader for Qaddafi, let alone anyone else.
However, there really wasn't anything remotely legitimate about the US involving themselves overtly (and more than likely covertly) in Libyian regime change. The simple fact is, Qaddafi was in the way of a real estate development deal (the ME pipeline, for one).
http://www.send2press.com/newswire/2006-12-1220-001.shtml
Notice the one that doesn't look like the others (in Africa)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index
In the Human Development Index, Libya is the only African state that reaches 0.75 points. It's the only green spot on the African continent for 2010:
In 1971, Libya kicked out British Petroleum. During the 70s, the state gained control of 70% of its oil production. State revenues from oil export more than quadrupled as the oil prices went up three times. And the benefitors were to a large extend the people of Libya.
Compare this to countries like Nigeria (an al Qaeda hotbed), where Shell has lots of influence on the government and gets the best deals, at the cost of lots of suffering. There, welfare is virtually non-existant. Or take Saudi Arabia, where the oil revenues also benefit only a few.
And then countries like Nigeria that are practically in foreign hand and follow capitalist agendas are the ones that are opposed to the idea of an United States of Africa, which is Gaddafi's Pan-African effort with the goal of freeing more of Africa's countries from what is effectively colonialism in disguise. Surely, the recent developments in Libya will be a setback for these efforts. (See also Neocolonialism.)
When you have power and control global economy (banks), it is in your best interest not to develop fledgling countries, but to impoverish them into debt (see Haiti). You don't need to invade anyone if you can cripple their economy. They will be your slave without the use of a whip, because survival itself is tied to existing within that economy (owned by the banks).
we're going to stick to our GI Joe banner of victory because it makes us feel good, allows us to avoid taking an honest look at ourselves and what we're a part of (and our real inability to do anything about it) - thats just how life is.
http://www.africaneconomicoutlook.org/en/countries/north-africa/libya/
However, there really wasn't anything remotely legitimate about the US involving themselves overtly (and more than likely covertly) in Libyian regime change. The simple fact is, Qaddafi was in the way of a real estate development deal (the ME pipeline, for one).
http://www.send2press.com/newswire/2006-12-1220-001.shtml
Notice the one that doesn't look like the others (in Africa)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index
In the Human Development Index, Libya is the only African state that reaches 0.75 points. It's the only green spot on the African continent for 2010:
In 1971, Libya kicked out British Petroleum. During the 70s, the state gained control of 70% of its oil production. State revenues from oil export more than quadrupled as the oil prices went up three times. And the benefitors were to a large extend the people of Libya.
Compare this to countries like Nigeria (an al Qaeda hotbed), where Shell has lots of influence on the government and gets the best deals, at the cost of lots of suffering. There, welfare is virtually non-existant. Or take Saudi Arabia, where the oil revenues also benefit only a few.
And then countries like Nigeria that are practically in foreign hand and follow capitalist agendas are the ones that are opposed to the idea of an United States of Africa, which is Gaddafi's Pan-African effort with the goal of freeing more of Africa's countries from what is effectively colonialism in disguise. Surely, the recent developments in Libya will be a setback for these efforts. (See also Neocolonialism.)
When you have power and control global economy (banks), it is in your best interest not to develop fledgling countries, but to impoverish them into debt (see Haiti). You don't need to invade anyone if you can cripple their economy. They will be your slave without the use of a whip, because survival itself is tied to existing within that economy (owned by the banks).
we're going to stick to our GI Joe banner of victory because it makes us feel good, allows us to avoid taking an honest look at ourselves and what we're a part of (and our real inability to do anything about it) - thats just how life is.
http://www.africaneconomicoutlook.org/en/countries/north-africa/libya/
The country is likely to pay a high price for the conflict, which has effectively paralysed the economy and led to a near halt of Libya’s oil production. With considerable oil revenues, a relatively small population and redistributive policies including an extensive social welfare system and subsidies for basic goods, Libya was enjoying the third highest Gross National Income (GNI) per capita and the highest human development index (HDI) in Africa. In 2010 the country was also enjoying a robust growth of around 7.4% and exhibited a high growth trajectory until the conflict erupted. The government had announced plans to increase oil production capacity to 2.5 million barrels per day (bpd) by 2015, but oil production and sales have been almost brought to a halt by the political unrest. At the time of writing this report, and despite the persistence of uncertainty, GDP is expected to decline by a double digit figure in 2011, but to recover again sharply in 2012, assuming the political situation stabilizes.
emceeemcee
Banned
Nobody would listen anyhow. Milosevic had a boatload of goodies that he began to spill. The media ignored the story because it would paint Darling Clinton in a new light.
Milosevic was a bad boy. The world is fucked though they fought that war for an muslim miniority who featured quite alot of criminals trafficking in the sex trade.
Now they are in the middle east rehashing the crusades meh.
Now they are in the middle east rehashing the crusades meh.
alexpnz
Lord Dipstick
Killed for starting a new currency?
http://www.thisis50.com/profiles/bl...-killed-because-his-plans-to-introduce-a-gold
http://www.thisis50.com/profiles/bl...-killed-because-his-plans-to-introduce-a-gold
Nope all I did was call you out for being an asshole to people for no reason.
Similar threads
