Fox News again accused of airing misleading video

[Hot Mega]

Do you look into everything you hear by fact checking? Do you look up everything you hear by whatever SOURCE you listen/watch?

Do you make sure what they say is accurate to the best of your knowledge?

What do you listen to?

Do you double check it all? Or do you listen wholeheartedly? Take without second glance?

How do you make sure what you know is what it is you truly do know?

Seriously. I mean it, ask Neal Boortz what it is by what he means when he says "he lies"

I explained it. Basically he is saying take some self responsibility and look it up yourself! That is that! Do not believe everything you hear or see!

What is wrong with that?

<chuckle> What would be the purpose of following news if I couldn't be reasonably sure of the facts they assert???

There is no scientific means testing I use for following up on stories unless I specifically want to reference more material on a subject.

Besides, who checks the sources you claim to be checking or confirming your news with??

FWIW....when someone tells you they "lie"...believe them.:o

 

[~~whimsy~~]

<chuckle> What would be the purpose of following news if I couldn't be reasonably sure of the facts they assert???

There is no scientific means testing I use for following up on stories unless I specifically want to reference more material on a subject.

Besides, who checks the sources you claim to be checking or confirming your news with??

FWIW....when someone tells you they "lie"...believe them.:o

What does FWIW mean?

However, like I said... Call Neal Boortz up and ask him yourself. Seriously. Tell Belinda you want to ask him in what he means by "I lie so look it up yourself, means"

What can be lost? You will have an answer by the source himself and closure for you! Go on.

 

[Hot Mega]

What does FWIW mean?

However, like I said... Call Neal Boortz up and ask him yourself. Seriously. Tell Belinda you want to ask him in what he means by "I lie so look it up yourself, means"

What can be lost? You will have an answer by the source himself and closure for you! Go on.

For What It's Worth, I don't particularly care what Boortz has to say or how truthful he is or trustworthy he is as a source.

I'm taking your word for it (without checking up) that the guy is a liar...that's good enough for me.:o

 

[~~whimsy~~]

For What It's Worth, I don't particularly care what Boortz has to say or how truthful he is or trustworthy he is as a source.

I'm taking your word for it (without checking up) that the guy is a liar...that's good enough for me.:o

Don't take my word for it. I rather you know your own word by your own discovery.

 

[Hot Mega]

Don't take my word for it. I rather you know your own word by your own discovery.

Thing is ~~whimsy~~, I know I trust you more than Boortz.... at least you don't outright claim to be a liar.:hatsoff:

 

[~~whimsy~~]

I don't. Just look it all up for yourself. That is that. I don't know how else to explain it.

Ah well. I love ya Hot Mega! Either way :hatsoff:

You know all is well

 

[StanScratch]

How come Fox News is starting to look bad all of a sudden under a Democrat President, Congress and Senate?

All of this just started happening lately.

Just an observation.

It didn't just start happening. There was the "Libby not guilty" blurb . Senator Craig and Rep Foley were both listed as Democrats when their sex scandals broke.

 

[meesterperfect]

So a live news program used the wrong video footage during a brief story?
Ok.

 

[hedonis]

Because no other news agency would ever, *ever* do anything that might be misleading, incorrect, or an outright lie...

Like fake memos about the national guard.

 

[Neutron66]

They're as bad as MSNBC!!!

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-...otos-sarah-palin-air-will-network-correct-apo

 

[Hot Mega]

Because no other news agency would ever, *ever* do anything that might be misleading, incorrect, or an outright lie...

Like fake memos about the national guard.

They're as bad as MSNBC!!!

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-...otos-sarah-palin-air-will-network-correct-apo

Again, those networks didn't created the erroneous material then use it. They used material created by others they simply didn't thoroughly authenticate.

CBS didn't create the document...it was supplied to them (likely by a Bush op anyway) and they didn't properly authenticate it. IN FACT, the story itself was accurate the document was just fake.

And with the Palin photos....MSNBC didn't create those pictures...they simply use pictures that were already modified by someone else and just didn't verify that they were modified.

Fox HAS create modified pictures and attempted to create news by splicing wrong footage to other authentic footage. How on earth do you do that if but on purpose???

 

[JacknCoke]

Because no other news agency would ever, *ever* do anything that might be misleading, incorrect, or an outright lie...

Like fake memos about the national guard.

hahaha or wrongfully quote a republican, and then laugh about how it was only 2 quotes that didn't mean anything. And then have no sources for most of the other quotes they ripped out of "headlines" They all lie whats the difference if it's fox news or MSNBC? or CNN for that matter?

 

[Kingfisher]

And this is news, I thought it was SOP for that company.

 

[24788]

Oh cmon no one loves GLENN BECK? I think he has an awesome way of going insane.

 

[jasonk282]

Should not the tecnical advisor/guy that works for fox be held responsible or at the least the producer for the show.

 

[Hot Mega]

Should not the tecnical advisor/guy that works for fox be held responsible or at the least the producer for the show.

Jason I imagine the only reason anyone at Faux would be held accountable for something like this is for not doing a better job of getting away with it.

The notion that these incidents were somehow mistakes ("inadvertent" or otherwise) is about as silly as me trying to convince you that water isn't wet.

 

[Facial_King]

"accused" is being pretty generous, Hot Mega. They were clearly caught in the act. Their apology is fine, but it's obvious that such an error would show MAJOR incompetence; it was quite likely intentional. And that's not the least bit surprising coming from Fox.

 

[Mrs Jolly]

Jason I imagine the only reason anyone at Faux would be held accountable for something like this is for not doing a better job of getting away with it.

The notion that these incidents were somehow mistakes ("inadvertent" or otherwise) is about as silly as me trying to convince you that water isn't wet.

That's funny, because on a science report on Fox news last week they aired an item concerning the environment. Apparently since the Obama administration has been in office the moisture content of american water has been falling at never before seen levels