Explain this please

Anyone? I've got nothing.
 

Attachments

  • funny-viral-photos-19.jpg
    funny-viral-photos-19.jpg
    15.3 KB · Views: 449

Ace Bandage

The one and only.
It has something to do with the Metric System. Fuck it.
 
A high tech tele-portation experiment?
 

biomech

Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit
Okay? A little strange.
 
Introducing the first almost completely human male blow up doll. He's light weight, fits almost any where.If that hasn't convinced you, folks the most amazing part is he will never deflate. Never again will you need to pump up your doll again. His always erect penis is hard enough that placed against the side of a cabinet to keep him balanced on top of it. For the few of you that do not have room for him in a closet. Don't wait buy him today he is selling fast.
 

feller469

Moving to a trailer in Fife, AL.
everyone who comes out of the closet, needs to do it in a way they are comfortable with, this is just more Unique than most
 
Well, to get things started I believe it's only right to discuss the object within the room that was designed to catch out eye as soon as we set eyes on the picture itself: the wardrobe. I'm not sure if the untrained eye among you will be able to notice this but if you look hard enough you might just be able to pick out the fact that there is a man on top of said wardrobe, it's hard to make out I know, but if you look he's there just waiting to catch your eye and draw you into his world. This man clearly represents homosexuality within the modern world - ridged, faceless, alone and without form. The fact that he's face down on wardrobe wearing nothing but his undergarments and a pair of black socks is an obvious metaphor for military service. What this artist is trying to convey in this section of the picture is the suffocating weight currently crushing the US military, that of course being the problem of 'Don't Ask Don't Tell.'

The other elements within the frame are rather inconsequential when compared to the main theme of the piece which screams at you with as much filth and fury as the human soul can muster, but they do give us some indication as to what the artists mood was like at the time. His thoughts, his emotions, his breakfast ... they all came into play during the composition of this piece I feel. It was all important.

The lone clothed figure with their back to us, glued to the television is a comment on our consumerist, media attuned minds. The evolution from the reading being to the seeing being, as it were. While one cannot read without seeing, he cannot also see without reading, no? It is quite an ingenious ploy, I must say. Kudos to all involved.

Male repression and the evaporation of masculinity are also rife within this piece. The drab non-descript walls scream: "Where is my penis!? I want it back! Give it to me please!"

All in all I must say it is quite an amazing piece of work, destined to become a classic in years to come.
 
Well, to get things started I believe it's only right to discuss the object within the room that was designed to catch out eye as soon as we set eyes on the picture itself: the wardrobe. I'm not sure if the untrained eye among you will be able to notice this but if you look hard enough you might just be able to pick out the fact that there is a man on top of said wardrobe, it's hard to make out I know, but if you look he's there just waiting to catch your eye and draw you into his world. This man clearly represents homosexuality within the modern world - ridged, faceless, alone and without form. The fact that he's face down on wardrobe wearing nothing but his undergarments and a pair of black socks is an obvious metaphor for military service. What this artist is trying to convey in this section of the picture is the suffocating weight currently crushing the US military, that of course being the problem of 'Don't Ask Don't Tell.'

The other elements within the frame are rather inconsequential when compared to the main theme of the piece which screams at you with as much filth and fury as the human soul can muster, but they do give us some indication as to what the artists mood was like at the time. His thoughts, his emotions, his breakfast ... they all came into play during the composition of this piece I feel. It was all important.

The lone clothed figure with their back to us, glued to the television is a comment on our consumerist, media attuned minds. The evolution from the reading being to the seeing being, as it were. While one cannot read without seeing, he cannot also see without reading, no? It is quite an ingenious ploy, I must say. Kudos to all involved.

Male repression and the evaporation of masculinity are also rife within this piece. The drab non-descript walls scream: "Where is my penis!? I want it back! Give it to me please!"

All in all I must say it is quite an amazing piece of work, destined to become a classic in years to come.

This is a critique that I would entirely believe came from the New York Times. You could write for them. In fact, I am starting to believe that you actually do.
 
Top