Duke Nukem Forever LIVES! Maybe?

I'm talking about Darthsnake. He got my yahoo top ten video games of 2010 thread closed because he doesn't know how to act civil and won't stop despite being wrong, right, or in between. I felt darthsnake should just be dealt with as an individual and not a whole thread.

I'm not talking about you ShayD. If that is what I read right... :hatsoff:
 
I'm talking about Darthsnake. He got my yahoo top ten video games of 2010 thread closed because he doesn't know how to act civil and won't stop despite being wrong, right, or in between. I felt darthsnake should just be dealt with as an individual and not a whole thread.

I'm not talking about you ShayD. If that is what I read right... :hatsoff:

I know, bud, I was just joshing you. At some point, the idiocy catches up with him.
 
This guy better not get another of my threads closed because of his endless bickering.

I'm talking about Darthsnake. He got my yahoo top ten video games of 2010 thread closed because he doesn't know how to act civil and won't stop despite being wrong, right, or in between. I felt darthsnake should just be dealt with as an individual and not a whole thread.

I'm not talking about you ShayD. If that is what I read right... :hatsoff

i just commented others bashed me and i bashed them back,you review the thread again and again

and the argument was started by other guys not me

:facepalm:

I think the phrase, "Read The Fucking Article" applies here. If you had, you'd realize the Kotatu article details the fucking demo of the game. How in the fuck you can possibly say that's happened before is beyond me, but alas you have.

the orginal article was just reporting that it could be at PAX not confirmed it was at PAX and even that i didn't say it won't be there just discussing that

and the you posted just posted screens but did not give the details a dn screens and gameplay videos have come for the last many years but the game itself hasn't

Strike 1.


kid


Funny that they all ran practically identical articles isn't it. And that Kotatu's reporter was the first one to play. But hey, doubt 'em all you want, facts don't seem to factor into your equation.

we have no way to figure out who was first to play as many sites posted their own versions

and i never debunked kotaku's proof,just saying that with their history where they have posted all kinds of shit they can't be trusted from the getgo

Strike 2.

kid

Strike 3.

kid

See below:



Which begets:

yeah thats why we have seen gameplay and screen for so many years and the game got released way back already,its just reaching us in this dimension now:1orglaugh


:facepalm:

Keep digging. Eventually you'll convince yourself that you're right, because you've lost the rest of us.

That slight ringing you hear each time you post? That's reality begging you to get back to it.

sure your fantasy is your reality

you really need to go and learn the meaning of reality,you have been bullshiting abt it for a long time

Sorry Whims. My BS meter was going off, I'll keep it down. :D

yeah cause you are from fantasyland
 
i just commented others bashed me and i bashed them back,you review the thread again and again
and the argument was started by other guys not me
the orginal article was just reporting that it could be at PAX not confirmed it was at PAX and even that i didn't say it won't be there just discussing that
and the you posted just posted screens but did not give the details a dn screens and gameplay videos have come for the last many years but the game itself hasn't
kid
we have no way to figure out who was first to play as many sites posted their own versions
and i never debunked kotaku's proof,just saying that with their history where they have posted all kinds of shit they can't be trusted from the getgo
kid
kid
yeah thats why we have seen gameplay and screen for so many years and the game got released way back already,its just reaching us in this dimension now:1orglaugh
sure your fantasy is your reality
you really need to go and learn the meaning of reality,you have been bullshiting abt it for a long time
yeah cause you are from fantasyland

First rule of being in a hole:

Stop digging.
 
This game better have a campaign that takes you about 100 hours to complete. Honestly, they couldnt have spent 10 years updating and re-updating the engine. This better have some interesting content.
 
This game better have a campaign that takes you about 100 hours to complete. Honestly, they couldnt have spent 10 years updating and re-updating the engine. This better have some interesting content.

there is no way this game will have a campaign that big

even games like FF 13 don't have that big campaign let alone DNF

also you have to take in account that they didn't spent all that time on a single engine

when new systems and consoles come,you have to rebuild the engine,they couldn't use the engine from that long ago even with updating it.

and that these days online is more concentrated on and devs just neglect main campaign
 
Well, after 2K games and Gearbox both confirming Forever IS going to be released in 2011 I think we all agree this is serious now, right? Seems they even bought the franchise, so maybe even more Duke Nukem to come...?
All they're going to do on Forever is polish the graphics, so don't know what to expect there, but since 2K and Gearbox released the magnificent Borderlands earlier on, I'm hoping for the best for this franchise from now on...!!
 
Top