Does anyone think Obama will be re-elected?

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
Like I said, I would never live in the South. I'm too much of a city boy and Yankee, and a trip to my family's land every year for a couple weeks is good enough for me.

Depending on what a person likes, there are lots cool places in the South. As for cities, Charlotte is about twice the size of Minneapolis and Atlanta is bigger too. Charlotte is very cool but Atlanta is too damn hot for me. Both of those cities have really nice places to live, if you like urban areas (which I no longer do). And I'm not just talking shit about Mississippi to talk shit about Mississippi. I've been to and through some backward ass places in my life, but every place I went there, I was like... sheeeeeet fire, join the 20th Century, why don't you?! - and that was in the 21st Century.
 
You obviously don't watch his show because the week after that he did a segment where he went to NYC and he interviewed "welfare queens", all of which were black
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/alexandr...me-maher-says-it-may-make-liberals-go-insane/
Lately, much, much less. He always ambushes his "conservative" guests, whereas he used to play more of a middle role but has really veered off into extremistville. I still sort of like him a little and catch when it permits, but at the end of the day he isn't really worth going out of my way for.

Depending on what a person likes, there are lots cool places in the South. As for cities, Charlotte is about twice the size of Minneapolis and Atlanta is bigger too. Charlotte is very cool but Atlanta is too damn hot for me. Both of those cities have really nice places to live, if you like urban areas (which I no longer do). And I'm not just talking shit about Mississippi to talk shit about Mississippi. I've been to and through some backward ass places in my life, but every place I went there, I was like... sheeeeeet fire, join the 20th Century, why don't you?! - and that was in the 21st Century.

I just got back from an area that isn't even close to "big city" feeling at all, just west of Duluth, right in the middle of nowhere on 50+ acres and I enjoyed my time fine, as I always do where I was. Would have went to Canuckistan as well if it wasn't for that new passport rule crap.
 
Lately, much, much less. He always ambushes his "conservative" guests, whereas he used to play more of a middle role but has really veered off into extremistville. I still sort of like him a little and catch when it permits, but at the end of the day he isn't really worth going out of my way for.

I just got back from an area that isn't even close to "big city" feeling at all, just west of Duluth, right in the middle of nowhere on 50+ acres and I enjoyed my time fine, as I always do where I was. Would have went to Canuckistan as well if it wasn't for that new passport rule crap.

lol

courtesy of the Andronicus. :D
 
4 years ago Obama runs against an ancient relic with a bland personality and a running mate who's too dumb to know when to shut up so that she doesn't overexpose her singular lack of intelligence.
Now, he runs against an "anamatronic" candidate, who would look perfect in a Disney World exhibit, except that the Disney robots usually have more charisma than Mitt Romney.

Either Obama is the luckiest fool on earth, or the whole GOP is a party of fools.
 

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
I think with all the past footage from Romney, he makes sure Obama wins
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...

vodkazvictim

Why save the world, when you can rule it?
I consider the President's re-election to be inevitable. Romney is going to make an ass out of himself in the debates and that will be that.
I agree with Mayhem.
There you go republicans, I've destroyed Mayhem's credibility. You can get off my back now.
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
4 years ago Obama runs against an ancient relic with a bland personality and a running mate who's too dumb to know when to shut up so that she doesn't overexpose her singular lack of intelligence.
Now, he runs against an "anamatronic" candidate, who would look perfect in a Disney World exhibit, except that the Disney robots usually have more charisma than Mitt Romney.

Either Obama is the luckiest fool on earth, or the whole GOP is a party of fools.

Obama has managed to maintain a high likeability rating and close to a 50% job approval rating, even among people who do not agree with his policies and/or think that the country is on the wrong track. Far too often, people assume that believing that the country is on the wrong track only reflects on the President. But they tend to forget (or gloss over) the fact that Congress has near record lows when it comes to voter approval. So in that sense, I would say that Obama is both lucky and I guess somewhat skilled in making himself likeable to a majority of those... outside of the hardcore radical right-wingers.

And yeah, the GOP has been like the gift that just keeps on giving, when it comes to the Presidential elections the past two cycles. Just being a Republican, when it was Bush who was tagged with plunging us into a near depression, it was going to be hard for McCain no matter what. But his admission that he really didn't know that much about economics, picking the moron, Phil Gramm, as his chief economic adviser (and him calling the American people "whiners" and claiming that we weren't in a recession, when clearly we were), suspending his campaign and also picking that poorly educated, unhinged, chattering moonbat, Palin, as his running mate, just made his fight fairly unwinnable. Of the choices they had this time, I think the GOP saw Romney as their best chance to beat Obama - who is/was VERY beatable. I have been surprised by Romney's almost total incompetence in this campaign. And I suspect the Republicans are too... it certainly seems that they are. He can't seem to develop a coherent message and even if he could, it doesn't seem that he's capable of communicating it.

What's funny and odd to me is that the GOP still sings the praises of Ronald Reagan, as if he's some sort of deity. But this iteration of the GOP has become so ideologically extreme that Reagan would no longer be welcome in his own party and he'd likely be chased out by being called a RINO. Remember the Reagan Democrats? Can you possibly imagine there being any great number of Romney Democrats? But it's not just Romney. He's just a puppet, playing a role dictated by the rad right wingers so he could get the nomination. The problem is the ideological bubble that the GOP seems determined to live within. Americans don't tend to go with a herd mentality. And if Romney loses, maybe the GOP will finally learn that lesson. But like I've said before, I'm hoping that a Romney loss will convince more of the intelligent folks, who had been loyal to the GOP, to strike out on their own and give those of us who want better choices someone to vote for in 2016 and beyond. IMO, the time has come.
 

Mayhem

Banned
To boil things down to the nitty-gritty: Despite all the vitriol from both sides of the aisle, most people are "forgiving' and rational about Obama's job, what it entails, and what he could realistically do in 4 years. I get very impatient with those who ask, "If Obama is so great, why hasn't he fixed the economy?" Because there's no frikkin' way. Period. There is not a living soul on this planet that could have fixed the economy by now. Argue all you want, but I consider it as an absolute.

When this whole disaster struck many, many economists said that it's going to take 10 years minimum to get things fixed. And they didn't put conditions on it. 10 years. Throw in an opposition House of Reps, Boehner and his pals doing what they can to sabotage for political purposes, and a Senate that doesn't have enough of a majority to help.......Obama is screwed and anyone with a half-a-brain (a minority if there ever was one) knows it.

The only thing is, the people who do know this aren't the ones on TV.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I don't know how scientific those polls are that you refer to, but this analysis is quite scientific. Then again, stupidity always trumps rational science!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tpAOwJvTOio

http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/news/subsidized-cell-phone-program-nearly-doubles-in-oh/nRDqC/

Cherry picking only the information you like isn't rational science, so yes, you're right, stupidity does trump rational science in your case. :facepalm:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/01/2012-polls-obama-romney_n_1928472.html
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
I have just E-Mailed Kenneth Bickers of CU-Boulder and Michael Berry of CU Denver thanks to your link to bet $50 on the election. Let's see if they reply. You want to make a $5 or $10 bet? I'll take Obama.

Bob, I would take you up on that bet, but betting is something I don't enjoy doing. Plus, I know how much you enjoy the horses, and I would hate to take money from your track kitty.
 
Top