Do u pay for sex?
- Thread starter chickfinder100
- Start date
If u have money u can buy any of this chicks. 
IncomingTease
Official Checked Star Member
I never paid for sex but i have paid for a cam show before because of this one guy i couldn't resist i had to cum to him. I guess i paid for sex but through cam show cybering hehe
Otherwise I wouldn't get it.
Flowers and long discussions? Fuck off, you gotta be kidding me
Flowers and long discussions? Fuck off, you gotta be kidding me
Kingfisher
Here Zombie, Zombie, Zombie...
Exactly. Be it dinner or just paying attention to some blithering blonde about her Obsession of Justin "I'm secretly in the closet" Bieber. We all pay for it.
Agreed. Couldn't find a video clip of it, but this little gem about sums it all up:
The fact that most men don't give a shit what you look like as long as you give them access to your hole(s): Priceless.
SpexyAshleigh
Official Checked Star Member
If you're a man who has no standards as far as a womans hygiene, fashion, and beauty goes then thats fine. But most men I know FAR prefer woman to look their best. Who wants to bone a frumpy, frizzy haired slob who looks like she doesn't give a shit about herself?:dunno:
If a woman wants a mans attention, be it a stranger, boyfriend, husband, or even in my case, men on the internet, she's gotta put in effort. And that kind of effort costs major money. So while the thread topic is, how much, if at all, do men have to pay to get laid...you gotta keep in mind that if women want a piece of ass themselves, they gotta work for it too.
Is that an offer?
Sure, if you're looking for something to take home to the family afterward. But, if sex is the only goal, standards rarely apply, and to be honest, the girl who "doesn't give a shit about herself," is far more likely to put out than the stuck up bitch wearing an outfit that costs in excess of $500. :2 cents:
And just like you said, you know men who "prefer" a woman to look their best. Its neither a necessity nor a deal breaker in most cases.
SpexyAshleigh
Official Checked Star Member
Well I guess thats the difference between men and women....sad that, according to you, most men don't have standards in who they stick their dick into. Most women I know, save their snatch for the best of the best, someone who makes an effort and deserves the cooter they're offering up. Even if I was looking for a no-strings-attatched, one nite stand...why would I spread my legs to the asshole who hasn't shaved in two weeks, looks like he rolled outta bed and didn't bother to shower? It boggles my mind that men don't care about these things....but then again, I suppose getting laid is much easier for women than it is for most men, so we're able to be more selective.
This has nearly everything to do with it. If its a choice between no sex, or employing "situationally lower standards," I would be willing to bet that most men would opt for the latter.
Sure, we'd all like to fuck "10's" every night, but in the real world, the only way most men are ever going to get a 10 is by bagging two "5's" in a 24 hour period.
And this is just purely about sex. Relationship-wise, different ballgame. But again, most men I've met aren't exactly serial monogamists anyway. In a sex vs. no sex scenario, sex wins out 99% of the time.
funinhongkong
Banned
hell yeah
I have never paid for the literal since but I have paid plenty for it being married for 20 years.
I'm married so I pay not to have sex.
RichardNailder
Approved Content Owner
We had this debate last night - I've been with more than a few women in my 50 years on this earth and each one of them has cost me something that, if it weren't for the chance of getting sex, I would have not expended - time, energy, cash or even on at least one occasion, my dignity. 
That said, I can only think of one instance where the "cost" of sex was greater than the benefit - and my first wife can rot in hell for being such a rotten cunt. In all other cases, the negotiated price, whether it be a shoulder to cry on or a few crisp $100 bills was always been equitable for both parties.
The only person, man or woman, that can truthfully state that they have never paid for sex is one that has never had the pleasure of successfully negotiating the price of 'said" sex - in other-words - if you never paid for it - you've never had it.
As stated before in this thread - even maintaining an appearance that may attract one that you wish to have sex with cost you something, at least time - and in the real world - time IS money.
Personally I set my standards pretty high and as such, I'm willing to take care of myself as well as those so generous as to share their time with me. If this means taking the time to make myself look and smell my best, spending time at an event that I would never attend alone, spending more on an evening out than is otherwise reasonable or just inviting a friend over and giving her my undivided attention for hours on end - meeting her needs so that she is a willing partner in meeting my needs then so be it.
In the end - if both (all) parties needs are met everyone leaves happy - if not - someone paid too little (or too much) for the sex they just had..... and that always sucks. Did I say that my first wife can rot in hell yet? :2 cents:
That said, I can only think of one instance where the "cost" of sex was greater than the benefit - and my first wife can rot in hell for being such a rotten cunt. In all other cases, the negotiated price, whether it be a shoulder to cry on or a few crisp $100 bills was always been equitable for both parties.
The only person, man or woman, that can truthfully state that they have never paid for sex is one that has never had the pleasure of successfully negotiating the price of 'said" sex - in other-words - if you never paid for it - you've never had it.
As stated before in this thread - even maintaining an appearance that may attract one that you wish to have sex with cost you something, at least time - and in the real world - time IS money.
Personally I set my standards pretty high and as such, I'm willing to take care of myself as well as those so generous as to share their time with me. If this means taking the time to make myself look and smell my best, spending time at an event that I would never attend alone, spending more on an evening out than is otherwise reasonable or just inviting a friend over and giving her my undivided attention for hours on end - meeting her needs so that she is a willing partner in meeting my needs then so be it.
In the end - if both (all) parties needs are met everyone leaves happy - if not - someone paid too little (or too much) for the sex they just had..... and that always sucks. Did I say that my first wife can rot in hell yet? :2 cents:
RichardNailder
Approved Content Owner
A married man with no "honey-do" list - NOT!
Similar threads
