Dildo Stuff

Status
Not open for further replies.
maybe you should worry more about intelligence span than dick length. or how about finding a guy that will actually care about you and treat you like a loving human and not a target range for his semen. how's that for a concept.
 
haha, i've apparently inadvertently started a flame war!

pssh. that's nothin. someday i'll tell my grandkids about the great Freeones flame war of '06. Even Mr. Freeones was banned. I saw it with my own two eyes. well... with my one good eye, since I lost the other one in the war from starting at the monitor too long, and 3 and half of my fingers from typing!
 
Firstly - it was an oversight on my part that Lacey hasn't achieved OCSM status yet. If she turns out to be an impersonator, you'll have my apologies on that point. Can I expect the same from you to her should she be verified?

Secondly - The use of the phrase 'who are you', is demonstrably baiting - since my face is my avatar, and I have a visibly public persona. Ah - but see - I've responded to the bait! LOL And no matter how condescending you may like to be with the 'psych 101' reference, my use of the word is more consistent with Webster and Roget than the DSM-IV.

Or do you believe that postcount=cred?

"I don't appreciate ANYONE, with the exception of a mod, coming on here and telling me what I can and cannot do. NO ONE has that right. That includes you, Kougar." - Bah! I didn't imply that you *couldn't* pick on Lacey - I suggested that you stop. It was ungentlemanly and tacky. But you do seem threatened by the suggestion - why would that be? Could it be indicated by the fact that you felt compelled to sound 'manly' by adressing me solely by my last name?

But perhaps the most telling point is this: "I would like to point out that at no time in this thread did I suggest that I personally have been told this. Not once did I suggest anything remotely indicative of my own personal experience having been told this." It would be more a persuasive assertion had you not just INSISTED that your opinion been gained from personal inquiry to your female friends - including in the previous paragraph! I never even remotely suggested that you'd been told point-blank that your penis was too small - only that you asked women friends about penile size, and they'd be hesitant to tell you the truth. Do you really question this?

Hmmm - and why did you feel the need for "numerous discussions with many different types and races of women" on this subject? Do you suppose your inquiry may have had some influence on the responses? Moreover, why would 'races' be relevant? Please explain that one.

As an intelligent person, do you really usually argue a point so vigorously when you only have hearsay knowledge of the topic? Lacey and myself both presumably have firsthand experience with the subject, yet you continue to try to validate your poorly-founded beliefs.

Your initial hostility toward Lacey for simply expressing her viewpoint, and then with me for asking you to stop picking on her, are indicative of deep-seated feelings of inadequacy.

And before you call me out on it - yes, that's Psych 102. It's a shame they didn't teach us how to spot a troll faster.

KK

PS: Advice: give up on the "sir" and "madam" business. This is a forum, not an Edwardian comedy. It doesn't lend you the gravitas you think it does.


I grow weary of this thread and arguing with you. First off, I do not appreciate your advice, madam. I do it to maintain a certain level of decency and......respect, though I firmly believe you will laugh at that. By all means, grab hold of your stomach and chuckle away. *sighs* OK......here we go yet again.

To begin.....the only thing I will grant Miss Styles is that if indeed she is granted OCSM status, I will concede that she is, indeed, with no question to any other possibility, a female. That is all.

Next.....I still disagree with you on the who are you? My question is valid, and I still stand by it. You have no right to suggest I cease any activity on these forums.....your opinions are, really, unwelcome and unwarranted to me at this point and every point in the forseeable future. Because I feel this way leads you to pose the question that I equate post count and rep with coaxing ability? Preposterous, and quite frankly, yet another example of you leaping to conclusions that are in no way based in fact.

I do not feel that anything I have written in this thread was "tacky". I don't. I expressed MY opinions on this matter......and my great disdain and disagreement with someone else. Again, I will say that if I appear harsh, it is because I feel strongly about what I am being accused of herein. Ungentlemanly? Please. If I had raced in here using foul language and threats against the fairer gender, you would have an argument. I'm sorry if you feel that I am not the type who holds doors or would assist a lady in putting on her jacket.....you are sorely mistaken on that. If I feel strongly about something, anything, I will write with passion. If that appears as anything but what it is, really, that is not my problem. It's who I am.

I never "insisted". You and someone else had again jumped to the conclusion that because I obviously feel so strongly about this topic, it must be because it hits pretty close to home. Therefore, I felt I should clarify that that was positively incorrect. To insist and to state are very different. I also know how to consult with Webster and Roget.......

Are you a psychologist? Are you an MSW? I'm really asking here.......I'd like to know exactly who I am dealing with after such a bold and exact diagnosis was made upon an unknown client after reading just a few lines written on a forum board. If you are, then not only were your actions unfounded and lacking the proper research, they were irresponsible. I know of not one professional in those fields who would venture a guess into the psyche of someone they had never met in person......much less after reading a few posts. If you are not, then again I pose the question, who are you? There are no words in the English language to describe how incorrect you are in your groundbreaking and professional world shattering diagnosis of myself being inadequate. Allow me to go ahead and break it down in simpler terms.

I fucking rock the house.

Furthermore, yes, there have been "numerous" discussions. I have many friends, both male and female. This has been the case for years. Not only that, but this particular topic has been a hot one for a very long time, and as such, has come up numerous times. As far as races are concerned, I have many, many friends of varying ethnic backgrounds, and cherish and value all of their opinions and viewpoints on EVERYTHING we have talked and continue to talk about. I do not believe that it can be called "heresay" at this point. We have discussed many, many topics through the years, with this of course being one of them. I stand by my "findings". Therefore, I truly do not believe them to be "poorly-founded", as you so simply put it.

Lastly.......look at my previous posts and contributions to the FreeOnes boards. My record, though small (the irony is not lost on me here), will speak for itself. To call me a troll is ridiculous. I love FreeOnes, for this very reason. I love the fact that I can come on here and debate lively topics like this, among various others. While many may consider it odd or "lame", I do take the rules and regulations seriously, and try to contribute and HELP when I can. I have never trolled, nor do I engage in any actions even remotely resembling a troll. If I saw a troll on the street I would step on it.

I also took Pysch 101 and 102.........and no, they never taught the proper way to spot a troll. Why would they? Seems like more of a College of Natural Resources thing to teach.

Good day madam.

P.S. I don't need any "gravitas".......I let my words and my voice do allllll the talking for me. It's just a piece of who I am. Deal with it.
 
pssh. that's nothin. someday i'll tell my grandkids about the great Freeones flame war of '06. Even Mr. Freeones was banned. I saw it with my own two eyes. well... with my one good eye, since I lost the other one in the war from starting at the monitor too long, and 3 and half of my fingers from typing!

Damn! I would have liked to have seen that, it would seem I joined a year to late :crash: Now if only I could have that time back, o' what fun I could have.
 

Lacey Black

Official Checked Star Member
Wow this Thread as truly become a Joke and I apologize to gtrcalguy on galactic1111's behalf for stealing his thread..Its funny that galactic1111 is soooo worried about sticking up for the OP that he doesnt even care that he stole his thread and he didnt notice that the OP didnt mind my statement at all lol.. clearly he is so bored with his life that he would rather argue on a forum then just keep his disagreements to himself.. At the end of the day galactic1111 you are no one... No one cares if you have a small dick... No one cares what your friends(if you even have any) said to comfort you.. No one cares who you think I am.. I personally refuse to waste my time or anyone else's time arguing for no reason and thats why you got my :ban: response to end the stupid topic.. So have a wonderful life defending your tiny penis and I hope you do indeed get banned
 
Wow this Thread as truly become a Joke and I apologize to gtrcalguy on galactic1111's behalf for stealing his thread..Its funny that galactic1111 is soooo worried about sticking up for the OP that he doesnt even care that he stole his thread and he didnt notice that the OP didnt mind my statement at all lol.. clearly he is so bored with his life that he would rather argue on a forum then just keep his disagreements to himself.. At the end of the day galactic1111 you are no one... No one cares if you have a small dick... No one cares what your friends(if you even have any) said to comfort you.. No one cares who you think I am.. I personally refuse to waste my time or anyone else's time arguing for no reason and thats why you got my :ban: response to end the stupid topic.. So have a wonderful life defending your tiny penis and I hope you do indeed get banned

You know, I love it when people sink themselves. Really I do. Your response requires no effort on my part. You did it yourself. You proved EVERYTHING I have said in my previous posts (which you obviously did not read). I need not do anything further.

Your last post proves that I was correct in my assumptions and thoughts.

KK tried to come to your rescue. And honestly, if you had remained silent, you may have gained from that.


But you decided to speak.


Which, based on your last few posts, is decidedly a horrendous strategic move, as most four year olds are more adept at formulating intelligent conversations.

I sunk your battleship. Did you understand that? Or should I say it like: "ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, I DON'T THINK YOU SHOULD TALK NO MORE!!!!!"
 

KarenKougar

Verified Babe
Official Checked Star Member
I grow weary of this thread and arguing with you. First off, I do not appreciate your advice, madam. I do it to maintain a certain level of decency and......respect, though I firmly believe you will laugh at that. By all means, grab hold of your stomach and chuckle away. *sighs* OK......here we go yet again.

To begin.....the only thing I will grant Miss Styles is that if indeed she is granted OCSM status, I will concede that she is, indeed, with no question to any other possibility, a female. That is all.

Next.....I still disagree with you on the who are you? My question is valid, and I still stand by it. You have no right to suggest I cease any activity on these forums.....your opinions are, really, unwelcome and unwarranted to me at this point and every point in the forseeable future. Because I feel this way leads you to pose the question that I equate post count and rep with coaxing ability? Preposterous, and quite frankly, yet another example of you leaping to conclusions that are in no way based in fact.

I do not feel that anything I have written in this thread was "tacky". I don't. I expressed MY opinions on this matter......and my great disdain and disagreement with someone else. Again, I will say that if I appear harsh, it is because I feel strongly about what I am being accused of herein. Ungentlemanly? Please. If I had raced in here using foul language and threats against the fairer gender, you would have an argument. I'm sorry if you feel that I am not the type who holds doors or would assist a lady in putting on her jacket.....you are sorely mistaken on that. If I feel strongly about something, anything, I will write with passion. If that appears as anything but what it is, really, that is not my problem. It's who I am.

I never "insisted". You and someone else had again jumped to the conclusion that because I obviously feel so strongly about this topic, it must be because it hits pretty close to home. Therefore, I felt I should clarify that that was positively incorrect. To insist and to state are very different. I also know how to consult with Webster and Roget.......

Are you a psychologist? Are you an MSW? I'm really asking here.......I'd like to know exactly who I am dealing with after such a bold and exact diagnosis was made upon an unknown client after reading just a few lines written on a forum board. If you are, then not only were your actions unfounded and lacking the proper research, they were irresponsible. I know of not one professional in those fields who would venture a guess into the psyche of someone they had never met in person......much less after reading a few posts. If you are not, then again I pose the question, who are you? There are no words in the English language to describe how incorrect you are in your groundbreaking and professional world shattering diagnosis of myself being inadequate. Allow me to go ahead and break it down in simpler terms.

I fucking rock the house.

Furthermore, yes, there have been "numerous" discussions. I have many friends, both male and female. This has been the case for years. Not only that, but this particular topic has been a hot one for a very long time, and as such, has come up numerous times. As far as races are concerned, I have many, many friends of varying ethnic backgrounds, and cherish and value all of their opinions and viewpoints on EVERYTHING we have talked and continue to talk about. I do not believe that it can be called "heresay" at this point. We have discussed many, many topics through the years, with this of course being one of them. I stand by my "findings". Therefore, I truly do not believe them to be "poorly-founded", as you so simply put it.

Lastly.......look at my previous posts and contributions to the FreeOnes boards. My record, though small (the irony is not lost on me here), will speak for itself. To call me a troll is ridiculous. I love FreeOnes, for this very reason. I love the fact that I can come on here and debate lively topics like this, among various others. While many may consider it odd or "lame", I do take the rules and regulations seriously, and try to contribute and HELP when I can. I have never trolled, nor do I engage in any actions even remotely resembling a troll. If I saw a troll on the street I would step on it.

I also took Pysch 101 and 102.........and no, they never taught the proper way to spot a troll. Why would they? Seems like more of a College of Natural Resources thing to teach.

Good day madam.

P.S. I don't need any "gravitas".......I let my words and my voice do allllll the talking for me. It's just a piece of who I am. Deal with it.

Yes, you *do* feel "strongly" about the subject, as you say. Everyone can see that... As Will would say, "Methinks the lady doth protest too much"...(soundeffect: LOLCOPTER)

I have a full day ahead, so won't respond to the more ridiculous aspects of your missive just yet. Instead, let's stick to the original issue at hand, if you wish to gain any ground in your denial of being a troll...

In three responses you've avoided the question of why you'd *believe* the results of your informal survey, given that your respondents had clear motive to be untruthful with you.

The most recent academically-executed study of this subject was seven years ago - superseding the the flawed-methodology, often debunked Masters and Johnson study of three generations past.

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/1/1/

Of fifty respondents, 45 women thought that width was more important, 5 thought length was more important. NONE, zero out of fifty, reported that size didn't matter.

The study included theories as to the physical reasons for this - that any sexually-active woman knows from firsthand experience.

Now, until you have a published, professionally respected article on the subject in a similar academic journal, can we agree that these results are more reliable than yours?

If you review your first response to Lacey, you'll see you attacked her personally for expressing a viewpoint consistent with ALL of the women in the above study, and later admitted that it was at least partially because you didn't like her earlier contributions to the board (and yes, that does merit a ban). I think you owe her an apology.

I came to her defense because I saw you as a bully - behaving aggressively toward someone who broached a personal insecurity of yours. The emotional tenor of your responses in the interim does nothing but reinforce this impression - certainly in the eyes of many here.

You've spent a great deal of time asking your female friends, exploring the subject, writing about it here, etc... You never answered a significant question I posed last night, so let me rephrase it:

Do you think that well-endowed guys "feel strongly" about this issue in the same way as you? Do you think they even need to ask the question?

And please, please, consider this: Is it possible that your particular reaction to the subject being addressed honestly IS the reason some women lie when they're asked?

I'll be AFK for a couple of hours - so flame away. It obviously makes you feel better.

KK
 

KarenKougar

Verified Babe
Official Checked Star Member
You know, I love it when people sink themselves. Really I do. Your response requires no effort on my part. You did it yourself. You proved EVERYTHING I have said in my previous posts (which you obviously did not read). I need not do anything further.

Your last post proves that I was correct in my assumptions and thoughts.

KK tried to come to your rescue. And honestly, if you had remained silent, you may have gained from that.


But you decided to speak.


Which, based on your last few posts, is decidedly a horrendous strategic move, as most four year olds are more adept at formulating intelligent conversations.

I sunk your battleship. Did you understand that? Or should I say it like: "ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, I DON'T THINK YOU SHOULD TALK NO MORE!!!!!"

You, sir, are a bully; and deserve to be banned.
 
Ofcourse size matters. Men and women are physically tuned in to each other in this respect and seeing how the vast majority of men have a penis approximately 15-16 cm in length (as shown by an international study conducted by Durex) you can also safely assume the vast majority of women prefer width over length. If lenght was more important to women the vast majority of men would have a longer penis, that's how nature works ;)

(altho I'm the exception with my thick and long throbbing pleasure stick :rofl: )
 
very funny Lacey. But I don't think that this sudden influx of noobs arriving with the apparent sole intent of trying to back you up flatters.

anyway, will all you people shut the fuck up already? let's get back to talking about big rubber cocks!
 

Perilypos

Retired Moderator
This thread has got off-topic too far and the exchange of insults shown here is far from being welcome.

Thread closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top