Did man really land on the Moon ?

Did man land on the Moon

  • Yes

    Votes: 108 65.9%
  • No

    Votes: 33 20.1%
  • What the hell is Skyraider smoking to make him ask a question like this

    Votes: 23 14.0%

  • Total voters
    164
  • Poll closed .

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Ahhh but didn't you get your information from the magic box, too? Oh, wait, you found it on the internet so it must be true.

No, I didn't get this information from the internet.

The information was not online then, but it is now.
 
I believe we landed on the moon.

I did work with someone at one of my old jobs who said we didn't. He also said that nobody knows how large the earth is, how big the sun is, how far away the moon is, and doesn't believe in the other planets in our solar system.
 

Violator79

Take a Hit, Spunker!
look up mythbusters moon landing debunks debunked.

There is no wind it's a vacuum in less than earth gravity but even in earth gravity inside a vacuum the motion still carries longer due to the reduced resistance.

Yeah Mythbusters said they did land on the moon, but the testing they did was at NASA, a government agency, and I wonder how many times they had to do the tests to get the result that pleased NASA.

There goes Willy. Spreading his conspiracy nonsense again.

Add me to that list also. I'm a big conspiracy theorist and no we did not land on the moon. Not then, not ever. Just because the government said we did, doesn't mean anything. One rule I live by: I don't believe anything the government tells me. NOTHING.
 

Torre82

Moderator \ Jannie
Staff member
A more important question would be.. Who cares?

The moon has no resources, no living environment for humanity, no real potential for anything. Sooo... why even debate it, except to say.. whether it's fake or real, there are truly NO reasons to even concern ourselves with it.. or spend government money on such endeavours.(heh)

You guys keep arguing, I'm gonna be in the corner comparing the discussion to 'who lays claim to a turd first? Me, NO ME! NO! NUH UH! MINE MINE MINE! It's mine, it's not a fake claim! Fuck your mother in her ass! I did already! Buttface! ::cries::
 

Violator79

Take a Hit, Spunker!
A more important question would be.. Who cares?

The moon has no resources, no living environment for humanity, no real potential for anything. Sooo... why even debate it, except to say.. whether it's fake or real, there are truly NO reasons to even concern ourselves with it.. or spend government money on such endeavours.(heh)

You guys keep arguing, I'm gonna be in the corner comparing the discussion to 'who lays claim to a turd first? Me, NO ME! NO! NUH UH! MINE MINE MINE! It's mine, it's not a fake claim! Fuck your mother in her ass! I did already! Buttface! ::cries::

You forgot the most important question: which came first, the chicken or the egg? :D
 
Listen to the audio I told you about in my first comment.



What does that have to do with anything I have said here?

You fail. :tongue:


I have listened to them, watched them, and like I said no real proof.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
I have listened to them, watched them, and like I said no real proof.

If you're talking about William Cooper then you didn't listen close enough.


Yeah Mythbusters said they did land on the moon, but the testing they did was at NASA, a government agency, and I wonder how many times they had to do the tests to get the result that pleased NASA.

Add me to that list also. I'm a big conspiracy theorist and no we did not land on the moon. Not then, not ever. Just because the government said we did, doesn't mean anything. One rule I live by: I don't believe anything the government tells me. NOTHING.

What he said. :hatsoff:
 
Holy cow. I just looked up William Cooper. That's your source? He's more of a wack job than L. Ron Hubbard and Tom Cruise combined. Aliens from Betelgeuse signed a peace treaty with us? Couldn't you find anyone with just a shred of credibility? At least Ralph Rene sounded like he knew what he was talking about.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Holy cow. I just looked up William Cooper. That's your source? He's more of a wack job than L. Ron Hubbard and Tom Cruise combined. Aliens from Betelgeuse signed a peace treaty with us? Couldn't you find anyone with just a shred of credibility? At least Ralph Rene sounded like he knew what he was talking about.


If you look on the site hourofthetime and their blog, or for video/audio on youtube you will see he no longer believed in aliens or a treaty with them.

Also, he was murdered shortly after 9/11 months after he accurately predicted the 9/11 incident.
 

PlasmaTwa2

The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
If it was faked, the U.S.S.R. would have revealed it...
 
If you're talking about William Cooper then you didn't listen close enough.




What he said. :hatsoff:

I will explain this in english.

Vacuum
only 1/6 Gravity
Vacuum
Regolith a reflective substance
Vacuum


Only 2 tests that the Mythbusters did were performed at NASA and that was because that was the only place they could find a vacuum chamber large enough to perform the vacuum tests.
If you wanna watch the whole tests you can watch them here.
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters/
William cooper and his followers are idiots who do not understand physics on an elementary level. They can't prove anything that they claim because they do not understand what they are talking about.
Whey they run into something they can't debunk they claim not even NASA can explain it like the moon dust that the lunar wheels kicked out not up.
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/history/newton3laws.html
Anyone who can actually apply the laws knows how to correctly apply them in a vacuum as NASA did when asked about the regolith kicked out not up by the lunar wheels.

The explanation is so simple it amazes me that simpletons like Cooper just can't accept it.
no air to provide any resistance in any direction, now remember newtons first law
"Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it"

The only external force once the regolith was in motion was gravity that is 1/6th that of earth.
 
I will explain this in english.

Vacuum
only 1/6 Gravity
Vacuum
Regolith a reflective substance
Vacuum


Only 2 tests that the Mythbusters did were performed at NASA and that was because that was the only place they could find a vacuum chamber large enough to perform the vacuum tests.
If you wanna watch the whole tests you can watch them here.
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters/
William cooper and his followers are idiots who do not understand physics on an elementary level. They can't prove anything that they claim because they do not understand what they are talking about.
Whey they run into something they can't debunk they claim not even NASA can explain it like the moon dust that the lunar wheels kicked out not up.
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/history/newton3laws.html
Anyone who can actually apply the laws knows how to correctly apply them in a vacuum as NASA did when asked about the regolith kicked out not up by the lunar wheels.

The explanation is so simple it amazes me that simpletons like Cooper just can't accept it.
no air to provide any resistance in any direction, now remember newtons first law
"Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it"

The only external force once the regolith was in motion was gravity that is 1/6th that of earth.

Why would you believe anything NASA says though? NASA can lie.
 

Facetious

Moderated
Well, according to two local newspapers that my late father had stashed -
Dateline July 21, 1969 reads "ON THE MOON" First Photo of Lunar Walk

The other reads - " MEN ON MOON -
Man Makes a Lunar Landing -- Astronauts Walk on Surface".

Another article inside (Page 8) curiously reads - " Senator Ted Kennedy facing Charges" :shy:

The interesting thing about mankind is that, like ancient works of art, we find that it's a bitch and seemingly impossible to repeat our accomplishments of the past. Why is that ? Are we just spoiled and lazy ? Maybe complacent ?
We went to the moon numerous times in analog but why in the hell haven't we gone back in digital ? :dunno: You would have thought that for all that was invested in the space shuttle there would have been at least ONE trip back to the moon.

Relax all of you conspiracy accusers, I never said that I agreed with Sir Charles !
f_charlesm_180f4cb.jpg


Knuckle Heads ! :D
 
Yes. We did. I'm sitting up here right now, surfing porn and watching Earth destroy itself. You should come up.....it's very quiet, and the stars are out tonight.......
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
No, William Cooper had it wrong. Anything else is a lie.

You're incorrect. :hatsoff:

Another article inside (Page 8) curiously reads - " Senator Ted Kennedy facing Charges" :shy:
The interesting thing about mankind is that, like ancient works of art, we find that our accomplishments of the past are seldom if ever duplicated. We went to the moon numerous times with analog but why in the hell haven't we gone back in digital ? :dunno: You would have thought that for all that was invested in the space shuttle there would have been at least ONE trip back to the moon.

You would think they would have gone back to the moon by now.

By now they should have at least a moon base.

But, they can't even stop shuttles from blowing up. If that really happened.

Also, we have only explored 2% of our own oceans. We went to the moon and can't explore our own planet? :rolleyes:
 
Just watch the Mythbusters episode dedicated to this topic, they proved we did land on the moon. It's not that easy to go back, due to costs and with our economy today, tax payers are probably going to think we have better things to spend that money on
 
Yeah :hatsoff: Also, go back to Violator79's comment.

William Cooper had it right anything else is a lie.

Like I said William Cooper AND his followers are idiots who know absolutly nothing about science or physics.

William Cooper said NASA had no explanation for the regolith doing what it did.

I post a really dumbed down version of the explanation that William Cooper claims does not exist and the followers claim its a NASA lie.
They seem to forget that Cooper LIED and said there was no explanation.
What I posted was not the NASA explanation it was a dumbed down version that my 10 year old niece could understand but for some strange reason William Cooper sheep can't understand it.
I left out how being in a vacuum actually increases the effiectiveness of gravity cause I knew that would really confuse the hell out of them.
All they can say is it is a NASA lie, I don't need NASA's explanations to debunk Coopers Bullshit I only need Newtons 3 Laws
because unlike Cooper and his stupid, uneducated, sheep I actually understand them.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Like I said William Cooper AND his followers are idiots who know absolutly nothing about science or physics.

Sure, whatever you want to believe. You still haven't addressed Facetious
and why NASA hasn't gone back, and why they don't have a moon base by now and why we have only explored 2% of the oceans.
Landing on the moon is plausible? But, exploring our own planet is not? :rolleyes:

If we supposedly landed on the moon when we did, by now they should have a moon base. I might believe them if they had one, but they don't. :hatsoff:

Anyone who blindly listens to their television and any government agency are the true sheep.
The government has been caught in so many lies you can't take them seriously.

Also, people will believe a low-grade program like myth busters?

Two guys who look like 60's hippie burnouts? :rolleyes:

I watched one show and they had trouble trying to cut a pig/hog in two with a rope.
I forget, but I'm not watching that show again.
 
Top