Denise Milani
- Thread starter physicalXXX
- Start date
If folks don't want to read all of the following, just scroll to the bottom and click on the link for pics...
Some folks don't take it as a joke and start defining things according to what other people have said without thinking about it. It happens. If you call it a scam, other not-so discerning folks may believe you.
Uh, yeah?
And I was responding to a poor choice of words that poster used.
Actually no, it's Merriam-Webster's definition (and Dictionary.com's definition, and Princeton's etc). If you don't like it, petition them.
Um... yeah? It's plain wrong when people use the words scam and expensive interchangeably, as if they are the same thing. They're not.
Really? Funny, I don't see ANY indication from any of the plethora of sources I've read that "scam" means silly expensive or over-priced. Care to share where you get this definition? I'll show You Mine - taken from Merriam-Webster:
: a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation
From Dictionary.com:
: to cheat or defraud with a scam.
From Princeton's definition website:
# victimize: deprive of by deceit; "He swindled me out of my inheritance"; "She defrauded the customers who trusted her"; "the cashier gypped me when he gave me too little change"
# a fraudulent business scheme
Nothing about "expensive" or over-priced in any of the three sources at all.
What difference does it make??? $89 bubble gum balls, $200,000 pocket calculators... I used a car example, so what? I could have used $900,000 parrot feather microwave dusters in my example. The contents of the example are irrelevant as long as it gets the point across. :dunno:
No, it's not. Sigh. They are selling something that you feel is over-priced. Over-priced does not equate to a scam. If someone is selling $1,000 designer jeans, of course that is expensive for a lot of people, but it is by no means a scam since you are RECEIVING the goods. You weren't deceived. If there is a shop down the street selling them for $10, that's no fault of the store selling you the ones with a price tag that is 100X more. You can shop around. They haven't deceived you, they just have a different price. They could sell the jeans for $1,000,000 and they still wouldn't be scamming you. You may FEEL their prices are unreasonable, but your malcontent with the price doesn't make it fraud or deceitful to charge that much.
So basically, all jeans should be the same price no matter who sells them, no matter where you get them, where you are from, your income, your preferences, the quality of the materials, etc... and if there is any price difference that is out of what you believe to be reasonable, it must be a scam. I get it now!
Look, expense or perceived value doesn't matter when it comes to the definition of a scam. Some scams hurt more than others, but the expense has nothing to do with the definition. You can be scammed out of 5 cents or $5 million. The common denominator is deceit or theft, neither of which her site has engaged in in any way as far as I am aware.
DM can charge what she or her managers want to members. As long as they deliver on what they promise in their sales letter, there is no scam. Price is irrelevant to scam.
Pics:
http://www.hugenaturalslovers.com/boobs/category/models/denise-milani/
*Sigh*
Dude. I was joking but I don't think you saw it that way since you wrote all of that.^^^ Just maybe if you took a look back in this thread, you just might found out how much i am a big fan of Denise and respect her and her work and do not really care if she get those puppies out or not. It sad how some people can't take a Joke. BTW thanks for correting my typo.
Some folks don't take it as a joke and start defining things according to what other people have said without thinking about it. It happens. If you call it a scam, other not-so discerning folks may believe you.
Uh, yeah?
And I was responding to a poor choice of words that poster used.
Actually no, it's Merriam-Webster's definition (and Dictionary.com's definition, and Princeton's etc). If you don't like it, petition them.
Um... yeah? It's plain wrong when people use the words scam and expensive interchangeably, as if they are the same thing. They're not.
Really? Funny, I don't see ANY indication from any of the plethora of sources I've read that "scam" means silly expensive or over-priced. Care to share where you get this definition? I'll show You Mine - taken from Merriam-Webster:
: a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation
From Dictionary.com:
: to cheat or defraud with a scam.
From Princeton's definition website:
# victimize: deprive of by deceit; "He swindled me out of my inheritance"; "She defrauded the customers who trusted her"; "the cashier gypped me when he gave me too little change"
# a fraudulent business scheme
Nothing about "expensive" or over-priced in any of the three sources at all.
What difference does it make??? $89 bubble gum balls, $200,000 pocket calculators... I used a car example, so what? I could have used $900,000 parrot feather microwave dusters in my example. The contents of the example are irrelevant as long as it gets the point across. :dunno:
No, it's not. Sigh. They are selling something that you feel is over-priced. Over-priced does not equate to a scam. If someone is selling $1,000 designer jeans, of course that is expensive for a lot of people, but it is by no means a scam since you are RECEIVING the goods. You weren't deceived. If there is a shop down the street selling them for $10, that's no fault of the store selling you the ones with a price tag that is 100X more. You can shop around. They haven't deceived you, they just have a different price. They could sell the jeans for $1,000,000 and they still wouldn't be scamming you. You may FEEL their prices are unreasonable, but your malcontent with the price doesn't make it fraud or deceitful to charge that much.
So basically, all jeans should be the same price no matter who sells them, no matter where you get them, where you are from, your income, your preferences, the quality of the materials, etc... and if there is any price difference that is out of what you believe to be reasonable, it must be a scam. I get it now!
Look, expense or perceived value doesn't matter when it comes to the definition of a scam. Some scams hurt more than others, but the expense has nothing to do with the definition. You can be scammed out of 5 cents or $5 million. The common denominator is deceit or theft, neither of which her site has engaged in in any way as far as I am aware.
DM can charge what she or her managers want to members. As long as they deliver on what they promise in their sales letter, there is no scam. Price is irrelevant to scam.
Pics:
http://www.hugenaturalslovers.com/boobs/category/models/denise-milani/
Vanilla Bear
Bears For Life
Older set, but Im not sure if there are new pics here
http://www.**********/channel/DeniseMilani/Denise_Milani/Yellow_Bikini
http://www.**********/channel/DeniseMilani/Denise_Milani/Yellow_Bikini
If folks don't want to read all of the following, just scroll to the bottom and click on the link for pics...
Some folks don't take it as a joke and start defining things according to what other people have said without thinking about it. It happens. If you call it a scam, other not-so discerning folks may believe you.
Uh, yeah?
And I was responding to a poor choice of words that poster used.
Actually no, it's Merriam-Webster's definition (and Dictionary.com's definition, and Princeton's etc). If you don't like it, petition them.
Um... yeah? It's plain wrong when people use the words scam and expensive interchangeably, as if they are the same thing. They're not.
Really? Funny, I don't see ANY indication from any of the plethora of sources I've read that "scam" means silly expensive or over-priced. Care to share where you get this definition? I'll show you mine - taken from Merriam-Webster:
: a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation
From Dictionary.com:
: to cheat or defraud with a scam.
From Princeton's definition website:
# victimize: deprive of by deceit; "He swindled me out of my inheritance"; "She defrauded the customers who trusted her"; "the cashier gypped me when he gave me too little change"
# a fraudulent business scheme
Nothing about "expensive" or over-priced in any of the three sources at all.
What difference does it make??? $89 bubble gum balls, $200,000 pocket calculators... I used a car example, so what? I could have used $900,000 parrot feather microwave dusters in my example. The contents of the example are irrelevant as long as it gets the point across. :dunno:
No, it's not. Sigh. They are selling something that you feel is over-priced. Over-priced does not equate to a scam. If someone is selling $1,000 designer jeans, of course that is expensive for a lot of people, but it is by no means a scam since you are RECEIVING the goods. You weren't deceived. If there is a shop down the street selling them for $10, that's no fault of the store selling you the ones with a price tag that is 100X more. You can shop around. They haven't deceived you, they just have a different price. They could sell the jeans for $1,000,000 and they still wouldn't be scamming you. You may FEEL their prices are unreasonable, but your malcontent with the price doesn't make it fraud or deceitful to charge that much.
So basically, all jeans should be the same price no matter who sells them, no matter where you get them, where you are from, your income, your preferences, the quality of the materials, etc... and if there is any price difference that is out of what you believe to be reasonable, it must be a scam. I get it now!
Look, expense or perceived value doesn't matter when it comes to the definition of a scam. Some scams hurt more than others, but the expense has nothing to do with the definition. You can be scammed out of 5 cents or $5 million. The common denominator is deceit or theft, neither of which her site has engaged in in any way as far as I am aware.
DM can charge what she or her managers want to members. As long as they deliver on what they promise in their sales letter, there is no scam. Price is irrelevant to scam.
Pics:
http://www.hugenaturalslovers.com/boobs/category/models/denise-milani/
Jesus ! Man ! :eek: Cool down. You're over-heating here more than DM over-charges. Don't You have better things to do in Your life than writing tirades against imaginary opponents on adult forums ?
To make it short, as I'm not going to lose my time like You.
You Yourself admit people use scam interchangeably with (too) expensive. Why do they say like that ? Why do they all make the same mistake, coincidentally meaning the same ? Isn't it, because that might be one of the the wide common street senses of the word ? Of course, it's wrong, in terms of semantics. Yet, a lot of people use wrong a lot of words, especially when they talk in non-native languages. It's up to one's intelligence to figure out the proper meaning of a word from its context. And it seems to be beyond Yours. You confuse semantical mistake with bad comprehension of given situation. Otherwise You wouldn't stick to all the dictionaries. I don't wonder You say: "petition them (the dictionaries)". You're pretty close to do that with forum writers for misusing a word by its definition. The examples are relevant, because Yours are absurdal, instead mine is a living one, as is DM's site. There never will be any car for 500 $, but there are sites for 3 $. Do You get this ?
A constructive bottom-line. Be so kind and give us a tip for what to call like site owners, who want to fuck their members ? Before You run to the dictionaries, it's fuck in the metaphorical sense.
I don't know if anyone has posted these yet, but this is the best see through that i've seen.
http://www.boobieblog.com/img2/3613001.html
and this is the best nip slip that i've seen.
http://www.boobieblog.com/img2/3506001.html
http://www.boobieblog.com/img2/3613001.html
and this is the best nip slip that i've seen.
http://www.boobieblog.com/img2/3506001.html
This entire response is a scam. :thumbsup:
Why are you arguing with a Fanboy of Denise?. You can tell he's a fanboy. It not worth it, just move on dude...
Hey I Second the Motion to have a very public flogging of the next person that calls any of the ladies Fake, or thier sites a Scam (unless the site really is a scam like the one for Crissy Moran). Now of course here in Texas we usually just "get a rope" but I think the flogging will do nicely :rofl:
Just got some new pics from Denise.
Denise Milani Pics From Lincoln Memorial, USS Midway
http://moondogsports.com/2009/05/28/denise-milani-pics-from-lincoln-memorial-uss-midway/
Denise Milani Pics From Lincoln Memorial, USS Midway
http://moondogsports.com/2009/05/28/denise-milani-pics-from-lincoln-memorial-uss-midway/
WTF:wtf: I didn't hear anything about her coming back to Wash, DC. How in the hell did i miss that?.
She do not do fully nude or topless.
1st few pics there are with colene, another SBB girl
AlaeNoctis
Banned
Tell me something, y'all Denise defenders:
When you are there... ugh... THINKING about you
and her, what goes in your mind, Milani dressed
or Milani undressed?
See, she knows your struggle and she plays with that
for example posing with another topless busty model
(naturally busty) like Rachel Aldana.
She introduces herself as a topless model but she
actually never shows her stuff!
And more, she keeps on lying telling her breasts are
real and you FOOLS accept it!
When you are there... ugh... THINKING about you
and her, what goes in your mind, Milani dressed
or Milani undressed?
See, she knows your struggle and she plays with that
for example posing with another topless busty model
(naturally busty) like Rachel Aldana.
She introduces herself as a topless model but she
actually never shows her stuff!
And more, she keeps on lying telling her breasts are
real and you FOOLS accept it!
You didn't miss her coming "back" to DC at all.
Those Washington ,DC shots are from 2006, when Denise was still posing exclusive for SBB, and before she started her site. Some of them can still be found on Brooks' site, and also a few were posted here waaaaay back in the first 20 or so pages.
No idea why that MoonDog site is trying to pass them off as new.
(the aircraft carrier shots are from Denise's own site, and less than a year old)
I agree. Every time I check on this thread its always something new and its always annoying.. and yet very funny to read.
If you think Denise tits are fake, the whole thing is a scam or whatever take it to another thread. Make a pole or something. Whatever gets ya off.
Chillax.