Here's proof that her boobs are fake
http://www.celebrityplasticsurgery.us/denise-milani-fake-boobs-breast-implants.html
different costume. it's not convincing enough
Denise Milani
- Thread starter physicalXXX
- Start date
different costume. it's not convincing enough
Let me answer Your question. Millions of guys, who want to look at, touch, kiss, suck, lick and fuck real boob-flesh and not plastic. You don't give a shit ? Then get two balloons, stick them to a skinny flat chick and go on.
Think: can "a fab girl" and "an awesome soul" lie to the whole world about her tits ?
Those tits give her the license to say anything she wants...
Give it a rest already! it's getting so stale, quit whining!
Right.... I care because i love women with real breast, not some chick with fake ass balloons tits. So she need to stop telling people thay are real....
Real or not ...
Do I care? Depends on what you think I love about Denise.
Her wide, but paper-thin hourglass figure from the side is unreal. It's one fucking hot hourglass -- perfect hips, rear, tiny mid-section, etc... In other words, do you think I'm even staring at the breasts? That's why I say I'm not remotely interested in her going nude. I already have all the curves I need.
Besides, if she is enhanced, I don't want to see them nude.
Yes, it's a bit "distracting" that she says she's real when it's likely she's been at least "modified." But at the same time, it's too many of us guys that are bombarding her with that question. Let's just enjoy the woman for who she is. Yes, with that "pertness," she doesn't look like the ultimate mammary intercourse (tit-fuck) partner. But does it really matter?
I'm in for that body head-to-toe, and no one is telling me differently. Not even her statements can ruin it.
Given that I've seen her earlier work, and it's clear they were nice, hanging DD cups before, she's clearly now bigger and likely "modified." I say "modified" because she could have had a lift or other things. And a lot of women who were original D-DD cup often like to state they are "real," even if they have a lift, a wafter inserted underneath, etc...
Do I care? Depends on what you think I love about Denise.
Her wide, but paper-thin hourglass figure from the side is unreal. It's one fucking hot hourglass -- perfect hips, rear, tiny mid-section, etc... In other words, do you think I'm even staring at the breasts? That's why I say I'm not remotely interested in her going nude. I already have all the curves I need.
Besides, if she is enhanced, I don't want to see them nude.
Yes, it's a bit "distracting" that she says she's real when it's likely she's been at least "modified." But at the same time, it's too many of us guys that are bombarding her with that question. Let's just enjoy the woman for who she is. Yes, with that "pertness," she doesn't look like the ultimate mammary intercourse (tit-fuck) partner. But does it really matter?
I'm in for that body head-to-toe, and no one is telling me differently. Not even her statements can ruin it.
Re: Real or not ...
Prof., I'm glad to see You and me estimate her old boobs size alike. I already wrote in an older post here she had her naturals somewhere between big D-cups and honest E-cups.
You say too many guys are bombarding her with that question. It's because of two essential reasons: one - she claims to be all-natural, two - she doesn't show the boobs.
In democracy politics, when a politician is publicly suspected or accused of anything wrong, is expected and pushed to prove his/her right or take responsibility for his/her wrong action. Has DM got the benefit of doubt for her boobs ? No. Then, why doesn't she do like a politician and make things clear to people ? I.e. by an official statement or ... showing the boobs.
Given that I've seen her earlier work, and it's clear they were nice, hanging DD cups before, she's clearly now bigger and likely "modified." I say "modified" because she could have had a lift or other things. And a lot of women who were original D-DD cup often like to state they are "real," even if they have a lift, a wafter inserted underneath, etc...
Do I care? Depends on what you think I love about Denise.
Her wide, but paper-thin hourglass figure from the side is unreal. It's one fucking hot hourglass -- perfect hips, rear, tiny mid-section, etc... In other words, do you think I'm even staring at the breasts? That's why I say I'm not remotely interested in her going nude. I already have all the curves I need.
Besides, if she is enhanced, I don't want to see them nude.
Yes, it's a bit "distracting" that she says she's real when it's likely she's been at least "modified." But at the same time, it's too many of us guys that are bombarding her with that question. Let's just enjoy the woman for who she is. Yes, with that "pertness," she doesn't look like the ultimate mammary intercourse (tit-fuck) partner. But does it really matter?
I'm in for that body head-to-toe, and no one is telling me differently. Not even her statements can ruin it.
Prof., I'm glad to see You and me estimate her old boobs size alike. I already wrote in an older post here she had her naturals somewhere between big D-cups and honest E-cups.
You say too many guys are bombarding her with that question. It's because of two essential reasons: one - she claims to be all-natural, two - she doesn't show the boobs.
In democracy politics, when a politician is publicly suspected or accused of anything wrong, is expected and pushed to prove his/her right or take responsibility for his/her wrong action. Has DM got the benefit of doubt for her boobs ? No. Then, why doesn't she do like a politician and make things clear to people ? I.e. by an official statement or ... showing the boobs.
Re: Real or not ...
unless u hated modified boobs; who cares.
Given that I've seen her earlier work, and it's clear they were nice, hanging DD cups before, she's clearly now bigger and likely "modified." I say "modified" because she could have had a lift or other things. And a lot of women who were original D-DD cup often like to state they are "real," even if they have a lift, a wafter inserted underneath, etc...
Do I care? Depends on what you think I love about Denise.
Her wide, but paper-thin hourglass figure from the side is unreal. It's one fucking hot hourglass -- perfect hips, rear, tiny mid-section, etc... In other words, do you think I'm even staring at the breasts? That's why I say I'm not remotely interested in her going nude. I already have all the curves I need.
Besides, if she is enhanced, I don't want to see them nude.
Yes, it's a bit "distracting" that she says she's real when it's likely she's been at least "modified." But at the same time, it's too many of us guys that are bombarding her with that question. Let's just enjoy the woman for who she is. Yes, with that "pertness," she doesn't look like the ultimate mammary intercourse (tit-fuck) partner. But does it really matter?
I'm in for that body head-to-toe, and no one is telling me differently. Not even her statements can ruin it.
unless u hated modified boobs; who cares.
I love all boobs.Fake or no fake, i dont care, as long as they are big
:glugglug:
man she is one of the hottest ladies alive
she is really pretty.
Mods, can we divide this thread into two seperate threads? One for us who want to look at her melons, and one for the dorks that want to debate her melons? :dunno:
Nooo! ....this thread is like Howard Stern. I tune in just to hear what the asshats are gonna say!
Denise is lovely! could care less if her tits are real or fake. Besides all of her body looks fine! Those eyes...that smile, but I guess some never look that high on her.......
your reply is less insulting than your argument