thanks for the info! :thumbsup:
Daredorm - fake?
- Thread starter Ace Ventura
- Start date
thanks for the info! :thumbsup:
squallumz
knows petras secret: she farted.
the site is real, as in it exists. but since it virtually exists via the internet, it makes me wonder, am i real?
the sex, or penetration, is actually not real. it has been virtually added via cgi. no penis has actually penetrated anyone's vagina. in fact, the penises have been hand drawn, and the vaginas have been painted in water colours, then added in photoshop.
its quite the process.
the sex, or penetration, is actually not real. it has been virtually added via cgi. no penis has actually penetrated anyone's vagina. in fact, the penises have been hand drawn, and the vaginas have been painted in water colours, then added in photoshop.
its quite the process.
i think jsmoothpa would be better off as an illustrator honestly...
It's the same as a found footage horror movie saying "This footage has been found and not altered in any way." These sites are the porn equivalent of The Blair With Project or Paranormal Activity. They tried to make it real, it even looks believable, but it's not. Though like the movies, they do fool some people.
huh? your comment makes no sense.
section 2257 doesn't require that sex videos be professional. There's obviously a lot of genuine amateur stuff on the internet and in the porn shops.
all that federal law requires is that a person be identified who has the names and ages of all the performers and that that person can be contacted. nothing more than that . . . it has not effect whatsoever of whether daredorm may or may not be real.
If college kids actually do want to film themselves having sex, section 2257 doesn't stop them.
section 2257 doesn't require that sex videos be professional. There's obviously a lot of genuine amateur stuff on the internet and in the porn shops.
all that federal law requires is that a person be identified who has the names and ages of all the performers and that that person can be contacted. nothing more than that . . . it has not effect whatsoever of whether daredorm may or may not be real.
If college kids actually do want to film themselves having sex, section 2257 doesn't stop them.
knowone is onto something there are a myriad of laws and regulations that must be followed so it's pretty much a given that someone is running the site . Plus all performers are going to have to be checked for their age one Traci Lords in our lifetimes please. They may use girls who are not regular performers in other films or sites but they have to be monitored or the owners of the site/company would face mucho many years in prison. Really as long as you enjoy the site why worry? if it's not your thing(and Dare Dorm is not mine) than there's plenty of other sites many with similar themes.
RichardNailder
Approved Content Owner
I cold live with the story line but why the fuck do all the "dorm" series, regardless who'd making it, have such shitty camera work?
Oh - and the stories that come back with the girls of guys that can't get their junk to work on camera are hilarious.
Oh - and the stories that come back with the girls of guys that can't get their junk to work on camera are hilarious.
