**** CRIMES: Stop teaching ****, homophobia *****....

Show me a trial of a ******** or assaulted heterosexual, non-ethnic white male where **** crime statutes were introduced. White people people are represented in those FBI listings, but that data has no relevance to **** crime legislation. By definition.

Senator Jeff Sessions (R Alabama): “A minister gives a sermon, quotes the Bible about homosexuality, is thereafter attacked by a gay activist because of what the minister said about his religious beliefs and what Scripture says about homosexuality.” (Sessions then wanted to know if the minister would be protected under the new proposed **** crimes legislation, because he was attacked specifically because of his religious views.)

Attorney General Eric Holder: "Well, the statute would not — would not necessarily cover that. We’re talking about crimes that have a historic basis. Groups who have been targeted for ******** as a result of the color of their skin, their sexual orientation, that is what this statute tends — is designed to cover. That would not be covered by the statute."

The difference between 1st and 2nd degree ****** is premeditation and it's a state matter. You're championing the federal government prosecuting state crime due to race, religion and sexuality. So, what you support is the Federal government prioritizing victims based on their race, ethnicity or sexuality.

Domestic ***** has a historic basis. We know for a fact that it has existed as least as long as recorded history has. As **** does. But, do wife beaters and rapists face the Federal Department of Justice for their crimes? No. Do stalkers? No. Women are ***** and beaten far more than any group is assaulted or ******.

The reason so many call bullshit on "**** crime" legislation is because it's inherently discriminatory and groups that demand such legislation have no voice in demanding stiffer sentences or Federal prosecution for all violent criminals.

As a white man, I'm 18 times more likely to be ******** by a black man than I would if the roles were reversed. That's not racism or bigotry...or any kind of blanket statement on any race, it's a statistic from the DOJ. I bring up that statistic not to indict anybody based on their genetic composition, but to show that the idea of using race to prosecute state crimes on a Federal level, while excluding the majority of victims (both in number and rate) is absolutely ridiculous.

Holder's own words indicate that "****" only applies to some. I have no idea how you can justify a mandated inequality in the justice system.

Anyway, as to the 1st/2nd degree ****** argument, it's moot. The victims I named in my previous post (save for the late Mrs. Hassan) were white heterosexuals who were *****, ******** and ****** by either a gang of black men or two homosexual men. The only thing differentiating the crimes is that Dirkhising, Christian and Newsom were all ***** in addition to their ******* and ******, yet no civil rights group demanded that either Federal prosecution or state **** crime statues be implemented in those cases. It seems that some would like to see Lady Justice's scales dipping a little to the left.

That was a nice little spin of the senator...was he giving a real-life scenario, or just made it up? In that case the minister wouldn't be protected by the Mathew Shepard act, because he IS already protected by the federal **** crimes act of 1968, which includes religion.

When it comes to domestic ********, many municipalities and cities already have stiffer sentences for domestic *****.

And do you have any basis to suggest that the white heterosexuals who were *****, ******** and ******, was only due to their race or sexual orientation??? And anyway, what sentence did they get? Life, as opposed to life + 5 years?:rolleyes:
 
With it being in all one post. Do you see my joke in my post now about if you **** a gay person and are straight you get double sentence? It was nothing but a tongue-in-cheek post in regard of what TT said.

Is this really an issue? I did not say that in a serious tone.

I must be dense. I understand that you're being tongue and cheek but what is the underlying point? **** crimes are unreasonable?

MY point was that the victim of 1st degree ****** is no any deader than that of second degree. Yet the criminal gets a longer sentence for first.
I am not an expert on criminology, so I don't really know the semantics behind it, but thank you.

I understand. But neither circumstance is more "tolerated" than the other. The justice system punishes based on severity of the act not deadness of the victim. Ergo, the heinousness of the act is what drives the justice system to punish more severely for circumstances involving intent, degree of negligent behavior, malicious indifference and even ****.
 
That was a nice little spin of the senator...was he giving a real-life scenario, or just made it up? In that case the minister wouldn't be protected by the Mathew Shepard act, because he IS already protected by the federal **** crimes act of 1968, which includes religion.

When it comes to domestic ********, many municipalities and cities already have stiffer sentences for domestic *****.

And do you have any basis to suggest that the white heterosexuals who were *****, ******** and ******, was only due to their race or sexual orientation??? And anyway, what sentence did they get? Life, as opposed to life + 5 years?:rolleyes:

Many municipalities and cities already have stiffer sentences for domestic *****. And many don't. Most don't. Is that not reason to apply systemic domestic battery to **** crime legislation?

And no, the Knoxville DA ruled out "**** crime" statutes because one of the assailants "associated with white people." But how does a conspiracy of ********* a random couple, ****** them, ********** their bodies and ******* them, in your eyes, not constitute a crime fit for the Federal government and potential double jeopardy because the victims don't share your sexual identity or ethnicity?

Those convicted of the **** and ****** of Christian and Newsom got life imprisonment and death. Yeah, **** crime statutes wouldn't have affected the case, but Henderson and McKinney each got two life sentences. One plead to avoid the death penalty, the other escaped the death penalty thanks to Mathew Shepard's parents' request. That's without **** crime statutes applied. **** crime legislation wouldn't have affected the Shepard case either. Both men will never see freedom ever again. Rightfully so.

So your gonna roll your eyes at the supposed triviality of applying **** crimes legislation to the **** and ******* of the Christian/Newsom case, but not for Shepard, who's assailants got the maximum sentence? Your only defense for **** and domestic ***** not applying to **** crime legislation is that some areas already have stiff penalties, yet Wyoming, without **** crime laws covering homosexuals, was charging Shepard's killers with capital ******?

That makes no sense.
 
Sounds like the gay community needs their own Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.

Those two absolutely LOVE what they do for a living ! Gold bracelets, Rolex Watches, Mercedes Benz, Chauffeurs, So. Cal mansion, Gulf Stream 650s, love ********, Dom Perignon, Lafite Rothchild, notoriety, THE best call girleys, Davidoff Stogies :pimpdaddy:

Bring on the phobias & prejudices ! Yea, just like that $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ NO ! Don't STOP $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Yea ! Yea like that, don't stop KKK whitey redneck bastid w/ deep pockets !!! :1orglaugh :jester:
 
So we are using the American legal system **** crimes on a ****** that happened in Puerto Rico, that makes sence. Does Puerto Rico even have a **** crim law? Also I am under the impression that Puerto Rico has a higher ****** rate than NYC, so it's envientable that something like this would happenen, just the law of averages.
 
People just going about their daily lives should not be targeted for **** inspired attacks.
true, like my ****** who was shot dead in philidelphia by 2 black guys who were trying to rob him, he walked away, they shot in the back, dead.
no **** crimes charges though., oh a plus the few thousand others per day.



Even as jaded as someone like you can realize the those typically discriminated against and attacked for one circumstance or another...were being ****** and discriminated against long before there was anything for them to look at themselves about.
those typically discriminated against and attacked? in reality thats white people.
statistics, whites are about 600 times more likely to be victims of crimes by other races than vice versa.
I know but in your world its opposite.
bizaaro world.
And I dont believe there is any racism other than perhaps some peoples thoughts against jews blacks muslims or gays in the US. political correctness has created the opposite.
fort hood for example, they knew the muslim man was a looose cannon but they didnt do anything about it because of "theyre lack of knowledge of the muslim faith may have appeared to be religious discrimination".
meanwhile a white christian man gets fired for wearing a god bless america pin.


Secondly, the story you cite where the *** was burned....one was black, one was apparently hispanic and the 3rd was white.:2 cents:
Premium Image Content
Upgrade to Premium to view all images in this thread
i read about it. it was the black latino that chucked the gas and set him on fire.
my point was, wheres the **** crime there?
mega, i dont dislike you but you have double standards on a lot of issues, you dont see that?


people in the US and europe are afraid to say what they think. afraid to call things for what they are but love to concentrate on isolated incidents when the culprit is white.
unless that changes expect a more violent crime ridden society in the future.
 
I've really learned to ignore gays hitting on me. It happens all the time. Just got a message on myspace from one of my friends telling me he was gay and to call him if I ever got "curious". I get hit on by gay guys all the time.

At first I was just like wtf. Now It's not really a big deal. I do kind of show off my body way too much.


I actually found this funny. I wondered if I was the only one whom it didn't really bother.
 
i read about it. it was the black latino that chucked the gas and set him on fire.
my point was, wheres the **** crime there?
mega, i dont dislike you but you have double standards on a lot of issues, you dont see that?


people in the US and europe are afraid to say what they think. afraid to call things for what they are but love to concentrate on isolated incidents when the culprit is white.
unless that changes expect a more violent crime ridden society in the future.

Nowhere because they didn't burn the *** because of some racial animus....Hell, they didn't even burn the *** because they hated him...I believe they were all friends at some point...They burned the *** because he told on them.

Where is the double standard???

If they randomly decided to ****** this *** the same way and the evidence showed it was instigated because he was white, black, gay or flippin' Buddhist they would have be charged (rightfully so) with a **** crime.

To another point (not that you've made but) that has appeared to confuse some. "**** crimes" statutes while argued in cases of ****** are obviously more relevant in cases where the victim isn't dead.

Is a killer any more punished if they get 4 life sentences vs. 10 life sentences for whatever kind of ******(s)? Technically yes, practically no....the person will never see freedom again in either case.

"**** crimes" statutes are practically more relevant when they enhance sentences for crimes against person and property which don't involve ******.

The "more dead" argument is really an irrelevant one. There are many types of scenarios where the victim isn't more dead or any more superior a person in which the killer's sentence may range widely.

The police's (the person) life isn't any more valuable than the life of any other person. However, in many jurisdictions a killer of a uniformed officer may be eligible for "special circumstances" sentencing (the death penalty).

Just like ******* of a person in the commission of a robbery subjects the killer to "special circumstances" sentencing as well....no one argues the life of the person being robbed is more valuable than any other.

The punishment isn't for the value of one life over another but the heinousness of the act. Just like among others "**** crimes".

But feel free "Meester..." to point out where you think you find my inconsistency.

BTW, you ****** was shot because the criminals were trying to effect a robbery not **** a white dude. They (apparently) didn't **** him or his race...they wanted his money (or whatever). You don't see that distinction?
 
How come if an old person is beaten, assaulted, ********, or robbed the term Ageism is not tossed around? Same with a woman getting same done to her by a man, or vice versa, it is not considered a Sexist crime.

Yet, a gay person gets anything done to them, it is immediately homophobic and labeled **** crime.

Crime is crime. Nothing more. I **** that term **** crime as much as I do neocon and Speidi! And countless other dumbass terms the public use because it is catchy and puts a group of people in one group and then adored by some and hated by others.

We are all people. That is that...

It's just a crime. Not a "**** crime". :hatsoff:

And, "homophobic" means you are afraid of "homosexuals".

Which no one is, which makes the word a liberal politically correct word.
That needs to be stricken from everyone's vocabulary.
 
who's to say what the criminal was thinking while or because he/she committed the crime?
and is a non white non gay less likely to commit a crime out of some sort of predjudice or hatred?
the answers are you cant and they aren't.
its bullshit, its a bullshit law born and enforced from political correctness to make guilty feeling douches feel less guilty.
why do they feel guilty? society, school, tv , movies and the media made them feel that way because they are too stupid or naive or young to figure things out for themselves. so we got **** crimes.

oh was this a **** crime?
Premium Link Upgrade )
or this : hope you have a strong stomach.
Premium Link Upgrade
Premium Link Upgrade
 
who's to say what the criminal was thinking while or because he/she committed the crime?
and is a non white non gay less likely to commit a crime out of some sort of predjudice or hatred?
the answers are you cant and they aren't.
its bullshit, its a bullshit law born and enforced from political correctness to make guilty feeling douches feel less guilty.
why do they feel guilty? society, school, tv , movies and the media made them feel that way because they are too stupid or naive or young to figure things out for themselves. so we got **** crimes.

In some cases you can't but in others you clearly can and in those cases the accused is correspondingly charged.

Just because we can't prove every premeditated ****** was premeditated doesn't mean charging someone with premeditated ****** is "bullshit".:2 cents:

To one of your earlier points regarding people who are victims of "**** crimes" needing to look at themselves. I'm not sure where you were going with that but you clearly must have amnesia as to why "**** crimes" legislation came about in the first place.

What did people who were being unfairly bombed, *********, lynched, burned, etc. for years in the US simply because of their race, religion or creed need to look at about themselves first??

Now I don't blame you if you're merely ignorant of history but I would suggest you do more research on such subjects before you make ridiculous statements like that.
 
who's to say what the criminal was thinking while or because he/she committed the crime?
and is a non white non gay less likely to commit a crime out of some sort of predjudice or hatred?
the answers are you cant and they aren't.
its bullshit, its a bullshit law born and enforced from political correctness to make guilty feeling douches feel less guilty.
why do they feel guilty? society, school, tv , movies and the media made them feel that way because they are too stupid or naive or young to figure things out for themselves. so we got **** crimes.

oh was this a **** crime?
Premium Link Upgrade )
or this : hope you have a strong stomach.
Premium Link Upgrade
This is why (from your link)
"There is absolutely no proof of a **** crime," said John Gill, special counsel to Knox County District Atty. Randy Nichols. "We know from our investigation that the people charged in this case were friends with white people, socialized with white people, dated white people. So not only is there no evidence of any racial animus, there's evidence to the contrary."


Premium Link Upgrade

That's just one example but I don't think I should (nor am I) going to fish through every obvious or apparent reason why every heinous act against one person of one race by a person or persons of another race isn't a "**** crime".

I can understand you not following subjects along well enough as you've failed to do in MANY, MANY other cases here in varying threads which have lead you to pretty ridiculous if not outright stupid conclusions but I'm not going to be your common sense instructor.
 
thats right just keep twisting my words.
too many times in your posts to even bother listing.
you twist words and meaning and you basically argue with yourself
youve got a altered view of the world.
today 2009. wheres the **** coming from in the good ol USA?
oh i know, from white people.

tell me, was this a **** crime yes or no?
Premium Link Upgrade
Premium Link Upgrade
Premium Link Upgrade

The ******* pictured below; car-jacked, then ***** Christopher Newsom, cut off his penis, then set him on fire and fatally shot him several times while they ****** his girlfriend, Channon Christian, to watch. An even more cruel fate awaited her!

Channon Christian, was beaten and gang-***** in many ways for four days by all of them, while they took turns urinating on her. Then they cut off her breast and put chemicals in her mouth ... and then ******** her.

Where be the Revs Al and Jesse? Are they providing counsel and help to the families of the victims?

Of course not - the victims were white

Why hasn't this received National coverage by the news media like the Duke "****" case?

Oh, that's right - the victims were white

Why hasn't the NAACP, ACLU, New York Times etc., called for an investigation?

Must be cause the victims were white

Why hasn't the FBI been called in to investigate this as a **** crime?
Oh, t hat's right - the victims were white"





So, if a white news radio jock uses the phrase "Nappy headed", it gets 2 weeks of constant news coverage.

If two white people are ********, *****, and ******** by a group of black people, it barely gets a blip in the news.
 
Well I am done in this thread if the tongue-in-cheek comment is grounds for people to get panties in an argumentative bunch!

:wave:
 
thats right just keep twisting my words.
too many times in your posts to even bother listing.
you twist words and meaning and you basically argue with yourself
youve got a altered view of the world.
today 2009. wheres the **** coming from in the good ol USA?
oh i know, from white people.

tell me, was this a **** crime yes or no?
Premium Link Upgrade
Premium Link Upgrade
Premium Link Upgrade

The ******* pictured below; car-jacked, then ***** Christopher Newsom, cut off his penis, then set him on fire and fatally shot him several times while they ****** his girlfriend, Channon Christian, to watch. An even more cruel fate awaited her!

Channon Christian, was beaten and gang-***** in many ways for four days by all of them, while they took turns urinating on her. Then they cut off her breast and put chemicals in her mouth ... and then ******** her.

Where be the Revs Al and Jesse? Are they providing counsel and help to the families of the victims?

Of course not - the victims were white

Why hasn't this received National coverage by the news media like the Duke "****" case?

Oh, that's right - the victims were white

Why hasn't the NAACP, ACLU, New York Times etc., called for an investigation?

Must be cause the victims were white

Why hasn't the FBI been called in to investigate this as a **** crime?
Oh, t hat's right - the victims were white"


So, if a white news radio jock uses the phrase "Nappy headed", it gets 2 weeks of constant news coverage.

If two white people are ********, *****, and ******** by a group of black people, it barely gets a blip in the news.

Now you just need to prove all of that was done because they were white and not because they are just victims of a another *********, ****** ****** in the US.:dunno:

These assailants were correspondingly charged after an investigation into whether or not it was a "**** crime". Based on the investigation the authorities conclude not only was there no evidence of racial animus but there was evidence to the contrary.

What don't you understand about that??? I know things in your world are not as they are but as you say they are but isn't this distinction pretty clear to you???
 
evidence to the contrary? you mean these subhumans loved white folks?

so its not a **** crime, gang ****** a guy, cutting off his dick and shooting him and burning him, ********* him and beating him in front of his girlfriend.
plus what they did to her which i dont even want to write about again its not a **** crime? if not then what the hell is?
ok so if four white guys did the same to a black girl would you say **** crime? would they be charged with **** crime?
the answer is fuck yes, no doubt.

see i'm anti racism and sexism ect, i dont want to see it coming from anywhere.
but the media, the law, this **** crime nonsense is racist andi dont like it.
and alot of self described tolerant people have absolutely no tolerance for any body who doesnt agreee with them.
i think or hope i'm out.
 
He was looking for prostitutes in an area frequented by transgender prostitutes, picked up the teen. Took him home, had a flashback of when he was ***** in prison, then ********* and ******** him because he hated homosexuals.

Unfortunately Jorge Steven is dead, and we cannot get his side of the story.
Although apparently someone like you would more quickly believe whatever the criminal says, than the victim in this case anyway.

First of all, I'm not siding with the ********, so I don't know why you think that I would even be defending him or condoning his actions. I haven't said anything that sides me with the ******** and I haven't said anything that condones his actions.

Secondly (just to play Devil's advocate), why can't the ******** be a victim here? He was ***** in prison, which obviously scared him for life. No, it doesn't condone his actions or even justify what he did, but surely a victim of **** is also a victim; are they not?

:dunno:

I personally know way too many people that have been sexually assaulted/*****. Each and every single one of them is a victim. Now, that doesn't give them the right to go around murderering people, but it doesn't change the fact that they are forever scared, which easily alters a person's mentality.

How is comparing those who blamed a **** victim to those who blame a ****** victim the same as comparing ************ to ****?:rolleyes:

Are you serious? You were the one who compared ************ to ****, so why are you asking me?

Being outraged because a boy was ******** and ********* is "overreacting.":rolleyes:
You are one the most uncompassionate individuals in this board. Just like this story has moved me, other stories in this board have as well. Such as the Fort Hood tragedy, etc. Is not just this.

Just because I'm not ****** all over my laptop doesn't mean that I'm uncompassionate. A person doesn't have to go to extremes in order to prove how compassionate they are in regards to the lives of others. People die every die. People get ******** every day. Gay people die every day. Gay people get ******** every day. Just because I don't sob over every single death doesn't mean that I'm not compassionate.

And, no...being outraged because a boy was ******** doesn't mean that you are over-reacting. But, acting as if this one, isolated incident sends some sort of shockwave of fear through the entire population of the gay community is definitely over-reacting.

It's fine that you felt the desire to post about this case and I don't want you to think that there's anything wrong with being passionate about something or even caring. But, relax...this isn't the end of the world. Your life is no different because of this boy's ******. You won't be treated differently. You won't be looked at differently. Your life is the same today as it was yesterday. So, stop acting as if this changes anything (for better or for worse), because it doesn't.

People have hated other people for generations. One incident of **** doesn't make it any worse for anybody.

You are only seeing what you want.

I hope you're saying that into a mirror, because you are clearly only seeing things the way that you want to.

You have already made up your mind - this boy was ******** because he was gay and for no other reason. Could that be the truth? Yes, absolutely. And, I don't think anybody is, or has, denied that at all. But, could his sexuality also have nothing to do with his ******? Yes. Yet, you refuse to even consider that to be an option. Hence, you are only seeing what you want.

Sweety, you don't understand what you read. I never said it was sadder beause he was gay. I said that we need to address the homophobia in order to prevent more of this happening.

I know you never said that; I said that. And, it was a question that was directed towards you, not a quote of what you said.

So you think ignoring something and remaining silent is the best way to prevent this from happening again???

There is no way to prevent this from happening again. It doesn't matter if we ignore it and it doesn't matter if we talk about it until we're blue in the face. People are going to **** other people for a variety of reasons until the day that the human race ends up being extinct.

Now, I'm not saying that we should all look at this case and just sit back as if nothing happened, but I also don't think that it's all that big of a deal.

Perhaps she is not a gay man living in San Juan, Puerto Rico??

...yet another way of trying to relate to the individual who was ********. How far do we go with this? Seriously? I mean, when do we stop trying so hard to connect ourselves with other people (who we don't even know) and start being realistic? When does it get to the point where it's just silly?

I mean, perhaps you're not a gay man, living in San Juan, Puerto Rico, who is 19 years old, gets haircuts twice a month, wears headbands, eyeliner and leather jackets, has a pet cat named Pequito, a Mariah Carey poster hanging above his bed and a slightly decended right testicle...??? I mean, unless you have all of that in common with the ****** victim, then you can't possibly have the right to be effected by his ******, because you don't know exactly what he, as an individual, went through in his life. :rolleyes:

I beg to differ that gay, lesbian and transgender people are just whining to gain sympathy from the world. Just that way too much ***** is directed towards this people and we need to stand against it, or is going to continue to happen even worse.

I live in Lakewood, Ohio. Lakewood has the second highest population of gay people per capita in the United States. I have also lived in Chicago, Illinois, which has one of the largest populations of gay people in the United States as well. I have been surrounded by a large population of gay people for my whole entire life.

From what I have seen with my own two eyes, a lot of gay people want the attention.

Where have I said that I am treated as an outcast? How bad I have it and how society shuns me? :rolleyes: I have actually been very lucky in that aspect, but only because most people don't know my birth details. I can't say the same for those who are not so lucky though.

Once again, I didn't say that you said all of that. I said that it's "people like you".

But, even though you haven't used the exact words that I said, you have clearly done nothing in this thread but remind everybody that you are, in fact, different from all of us. And, you have also made comments that revolve around how we wouldn't understand, but expect us to believe that you do.

I would be just as outraged about the story you described. However, many people here post stories about crimes. What's wrong about me posting a single case of a crime against a homosexual?? First time in like 8 months since I been here... What's your problem?

There's nothing wrong with posting a story about a crime that was committed against a homosexual. In no way, shape or form am I saying that you are doing something wrong. I was clearly making a point that you are getting all riled up about this case, not because somebody was ********, but because a GAY somebody was ********. That is why I asked the questions that I did.
 
evidence to the contrary? you mean these subhumans loved white folks?

so its not a **** crime, gang ****** a guy, cutting off his dick and shooting him and burning him, ********* him and beating him in front of his girlfriend.
plus what they did to her which i dont even want to write about again its not a **** crime? if not then what the hell is?
ok so if four white guys did the same to a black girl would you say **** crime? would they be charged with **** crime?
the answer is fuck yes, no doubt.

see i'm anti racism and sexism ect, i dont want to see it coming from anywhere.
but the media, the law, this **** crime nonsense is racist andi dont like it.
and alot of self described tolerant people have absolutely no tolerance for any body who doesnt agreee with them.
i think or hope i'm out.

In Riverside, CA two brothers ****** and dismembered their ******. Is that a **** crime under the guidelines of "**** crimes" statutes? If so, why? If not, why?
 
I also remember a case where a guy set a homeless guy on fire and another case where a guy stabbed old people with a butcher ***** in the throat. Those were **** crimes too.
 
I dont like the **** crime law for 3 reasons.
Its illogical to create a double sentence or increased sentence
based on what the motivation may have been.
1st degree is 1st degree, *********** manslaughter is *********** manslaughter ect.

Clearly establishing a persons thoughts at the time of the ****** is impossible.
And it is impossible to define. Dahmer for example ****** mostly black gays> did he **** blacks? did he **** gays? Bundy ****** white girls, did he **** whites? girls? . Colin ferguson ****** only the whites on the train, did he **** whites?
And also it only applies to white defendants, which is completly discriminatory.

I'd feel that way no matter what color, religion or sexual preference i was
 
Back
Top